“marginally significant”

An analysis of the clustering data revealed a main effect of category size ( F (4, 32) = 8.54, p < .001) and a marginally significant orienting task by category size interaction ( F (4, 32) = 2.58, p = .056), which follows Hunt and Seta's observation of larger differences in clustering between the item-specific and relational encoding conditions for the smaller as compared to the larger categories.

For sporophore length (Figure 5A ), a marginally significant clipping × mowing interaction was detected ( F = 3.891, p = 0.056).

The main effect of condition was marginally significant ( F (2, 72) = 3.01, p = .056, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\eta}_p^2 $$\end{document} η p 2 = .08, 1 – β = .57).

However this was mitigated by a marginally significant interaction by group [group × change, F (1, 30) = 3.969, p = 0.056], such that this effect was observed in tone speakers ( p < 0.001) but not in the control group ( p = 0.215).

Furthermore, the response time to fearful expressions showed a marginally significant increase in the MBCT group at the end of the study ( p = 0.056) ( Table 3 and Figure 3B ).

The impact of SCSM on DFS in esophageal cancer was marginally significant (P=0.056) ( 44 ).

We observed a decrease in proliferation in Bi-L E7 / K14 – tTA / FancD2 +/+ mice treated with doxycycline that was marginally significant ( P = 0.056) compared to that observed in Bi-L E7 / K14 – tTA / FancD2 +/+ mice not treated with doxycycline.

Considering only the MEM anticipations towards the target direction, differences between ASD and TD became marginally significant ( p = 0.056, d = 0.5, see Table 4 ).

The curvature of the LOIC was marginally significant [a4 = 0.14, 95% CI (−0.004, 0.277), p = 0.056], suggesting that whether adolescents or parents hold high educational expectations is related to better parent–child relationships as reported by parents (see Figure 2B ).

However, after applying the Bonferroni correction, only maternal sensitivity, maternal controlling behavior, and infant cooperative behavior remained significantly associated with types of maternal violation in the FSFF, while maternal unresponsivity was marginally significant ( p =.056).

There was a marginally significant interaction between the prognostic impact of a decrease in eGFR and the choice of diagnostic imaging modality (interaction-p = 0.056).

For younger adults, the group × occasion interaction was significant for the parcels of numerical tasks, F (1,143) = 7.48, P = 0.007, d = 0.33, and figural-spatial tasks, F (1,143) = 7.84, P = 0.006, d = 0.38, and marginally significant for the Raven, F (1,142) = 3.73, P = 0.056, d = 0.33.

8.25 years) despite the difference in survival is marginally significant ( p = 0.056, Figure 4D ).

Differences between post-program and follow-up are marginally significant ( b = 0.13, SE = 0.057, p = .056), showing a slight increase.

Again, season was marginally significant ( P = .056), where children were more likely to be diagnosed with HRV-C in the winter months ( Fig 2 , A ).

3 C; P = 0.003 and 0.0006, respectively), whereas that of GR was marginally significant (P = 0.056).

Personal Event Mann–Whitney U -tests on free recall performance revealed significant differences for two periods: recent past ( z = 2.93, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.25), near future ( z = 2.41, p = 0.01, η 2 = 0.18) and a marginally significant effect for the distant future ( z = 1.95, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.11).

Moreover, the analysis also showed a marginally significant Gender × Word type interaction, b = .39, SE = .20, t (147.1) = 1.93, p = .056.

The difference in retention rates at month one was marginally significant ( P = 0.056), while those at month 6 ( P = 0.025) and month 12 ( P = 0.005) were statistically significant. 3.3.

In the multivariate model with all correlates ( Table 3 ), collection time, RDW, and ABO blood group were each independently correlated with the percentage of activated platelets, whereas MPV remained marginally significant (p = 0.056).

Female first-person narrators (ie, the patient) were more likely to report mental status change (56.3%, 27/48) than male first-person narrators (36.4%, 16/44), a marginally significant effect by logistic regression ( P =.056), whereas reports of third-person narrators did not differ for women (27.9%, 12/43) and men (28.2%, 11/39) patients.

Among the 20 comparisons made, significant differences in BMD were observed between the Beta‐adrenergic Blockers and four drug categories ( Figure 7 ), while the difference between the Antiplatelet Drugs and Beta‐adrenergic Blockers was marginally significant (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1–1.32, P ‐value = 0.056).

For the latency, we found a marginally significant main effect of group with the HDs showing longer N170 latency than the CSs (179 ms vs. 172 ms, F = 3.95, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.11)(Fig. 4a ).

Replication number (i.e., whether the opponent, slavemaker, conspecific, or related species, was used on the first, second, or third time) was taken into account and was marginally significant ( F 2,81 = 3.00, P = 0.056), and none of its interactions with other factors were significant ( P > 0.1 for all interactions).

The main effect for the requested movement was marginally significant, F (1,82) = 3.76, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.044.