“marginally significant”

These parameters were negatively correlated in the Pearson’s correlation analysis as well, although in terms of statistical significance, only the correlation with the ΔDBP was marginally significant ( P =0.056) ( Table 5 ).

The interaction of the factors Reward × SOA was marginally significant, F (2, 44) = 3.079, p = .056, η p 2 = 0.123.

The correlation with use of sleep medication was small and marginally significant ( r = 0.094, p = 0.056).

The PD-L1 expression level had no significant correlation with sex and age but had a significant correlation with TNM stage and pathological differentiation no matter in whole tumor tissues or TN (P<0.05), with a marginally significant association with survival status in TN (P=0.056) and significantly associated with pathological differentiation in TS ( Fig. 3A-C ).

The β LDL/HDL had the biggest values in the non-traditional lipid variables and there was a marginally significant difference between β LDL/HDL and β LDL ( P = 0.056).

(2015) found that the perceived sensations during sham and real tRNS conditions were indistinguishable, whereas the difference between anodal tDCS and sham was marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

The analysis yielded a marginally significant main effect of Valence Type [ F (2, 70) = 2.94, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.078] and a significant Valence Type x Accent Group interaction [ F (1.96, 68.83) = 3.72, p = 0.030, η 2 p = 0.096].

Furthermore, a marginally significant effect of plant community richness on network–level specialization was observed ( p = 0.056) (Figure 6H , Table 3 ).

Partial correlation also revealed a marginally significant relationship between SRS (total) T score at baseline and 12-month TTS, controlling for baseline TTS, r partial = 0.312, p = 0.056 (Spearman).

As for the OC patients, PaCO 2 measurements 6 and 24 h postoperatively displayed marginally significant increase (P = 0.056) and decrease (P = 0.044) respectively, compared to laparoscopic group [ 25 ].

A marginally significant difference in reaction times was observed between groups ( p = 0.056), regardless of the condition, suggesting faster reaction times in the l-IPA group.

Frequency of homelessness was positively related to hopelessness score; this association was marginally significant in the initial bivariate analysis (p =.056; see Supplementary Table 2 ) and statistically significant in the multivariable adjusted model ( p =.048; see Table 4 ).

Marginally significant difference was also observed between L. lactis and Lactobacillus high-G + C species ( p = 0.056).

In comparison, the combined explained variance by soil properties (soil pH, C/N, and moisture) had a marginally significant negative relationship with latitude for soil fungal communities (Adj R 2 = 0.16, p = 0.056) (Fig. 6a ).

The interaction was marginally significant (F(3,39) = 2.75, p = .056).

Subsequent analysis performed on each notation revealed that a significant grade × distance interactions in Mixed ( β = −0.04, p = 0.030) and a marginally significant interaction in Nonsym ( β = −0.06, p = 0.056), but no significant interaction in Sym ( OR = −0.07, p = 0.208).

There was a marginally significant difference [t(7) = 2.290, p = 0.056].

The repeated measures ANOVA on distance (dist-0 through dist-5) showed a marginally significant main effect, F (4,92)=2.39, p =.056, ηp 2 =.09, which plateaued at the dist-2 location (Fig. 4 B).

Flax-seeds were more frequently consumed in the n -6/ n -3 < 10 group but the differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.056) and no other differences were observed.

However, there was a marginally significant three-way interaction on independent assessor negative ratings ( b = -5.50, SE = 2.84, p = .056), which mirrored the three-way interaction for positive ratings.

In the LI group, an extinction source memory bias (the bias to attribute more CS + than CS − to the extinction phase) was negatively related to selective enhancement in LI for items encoded in preconditioning ( t (198) = −4.27, P < 0.001), conditioning ( t (198) = −3.07, P = 0.003) and marginally significant in extinction ( t (198) = −1.92, P = 0.056).

For hit rates, analyses on the matched set of items revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 47) = 3.84, p = 0.056, η 2 p = 0.076, similar to the one observed with the full set of stimuli.

Relationship between Facial Color Type and Hunting Behavior The proportion of facial color types differed marginally significant between the two types of hunting behaviors (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.056; Figure 5b ); the proportion of group-hunting species with A-type faces was higher than for species with other face types.

In a third sensitivity analysis using a higher threshold to define high chronic stress in a subset of participants (n=1423), chronic stress was associated with incident hypertension after adjustment for demographics, hypertension risk factors, and baseline stress in model 3 ( P =0.029), but became marginally significant after adjustment for behavioral factors in model 4 ( P =0.056; Table S3 ).

We only found a marginally significant effect of stimulation condition [ F (1,394) = 3.66, p = 0.056] and a significant effect of sleep stage [ F (5,394) = 1506.97, p < 2e-16].