“marginally significant”

The interaction of the factors Reward × SOA was marginally significant, F (2, 44) = 3.079, p = .056, η p 2 = 0.123.

The effect of gender is strong (b = −0.172, p < 0.001; B = −0.076), the effect of age is a little weaker (b = −0.009, p < 0.001; B = −0.085), that of marital status becomes marginally significant (b = 0.048, p = 0.056; B = 0.021), and that of household size becomes weaker (b = 0.057, p < 0.001; B = 0.064), while the effect of the subjective evaluation of health becomes much weaker (b = 0.207, p < 0.001; B = 0.136).

A similar proportion of colonies released on the second night (77%), but nearly twice as many underwent extensive spawning (64%), such that overall spawning intensity was greater (marginally significant at P = 0.056).

Moreover, the analysis also showed a marginally significant Gender × Word type interaction, b = .39, SE = .20, t (147.1) = 1.93, p = .056.

Differences between post-program and follow-up are marginally significant ( b = 0.13, SE = 0.057, p = .056), showing a slight increase.

Behavioral data Emotional experience intensity rating scores were analyzed using a 2 (group: deaf student group/typical hearing control group) × 3 (condition: neutral/cognitive reappraisal/expression suppression) repeated-measures ANOVA which revealed a marginally significant main effect of group ( F (1, 55) = 3.823, p = 0.056, η p 2 = 0.065), whereby the deaf student group ( M = 4.790, SD = 0.334) was associated with a larger emotional intensity score than the control group ( M = 3.889, SD = 0.317) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

Donor age at or above 35 years and the presence of donor‐specific antibodies with a history of antibody‐mediated rejection (both p < 0.05) were associated with worse graft survival, while medication non‐adherence was associated despite being marginally significant ( p = 0.056).

There was also a marginally significant partner association (B = 2.46, SE (B) = 1.27, Beta = 0.19, p = .056) between affection in the pleasant conversation and relationship satisfaction.

Types of narcissism had marginally significant main effect on other-rated creativity performance, F (2, 107) = 2.95, p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.05.

When data from MMSE was used, the pooled effect size was marginally significant (SMD, 0.65; 95% CI, −0.02 to 1.32; p = 0.056; I 2 = 89.9%).

Among the 20 comparisons made, significant differences in BMD were observed between the Beta‐adrenergic Blockers and four drug categories ( Figure 7 ), while the difference between the Antiplatelet Drugs and Beta‐adrenergic Blockers was marginally significant (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1–1.32, P ‐value = 0.056).

Subsequent analysis performed on each notation revealed that a significant grade × distance interactions in Mixed ( β = −0.04, p = 0.030) and a marginally significant interaction in Nonsym ( β = −0.06, p = 0.056), but no significant interaction in Sym ( OR = −0.07, p = 0.208).

Although the average of implementation climate across clinics was significant and showed marginally significant variance (variance = 29.77, p = .056), nearly all unexplained variance in attitudes toward eHealth Familias Unidas Mental Health at the between level was negligible (0.870, p = .962).

Complications showed a marginally significant association with mortality (χ2 = 3.637, df = 1, p = 0.056).

In contrast, statistically marginally significant differences were found in LDL-C levels (P=0.056), and no statistically significant differences were observed in TC and HDL-C levels (in females) (P>0.1).

After adjusting for age, sex, the association remained marginally significant (adjusted OR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00–1.10; p = 0.056) ( Table 3 ).

EMPA, in Omar et al.'s [ 14 ] study, showed a marginally significant reduction in mPAP during exercise (−2.37 mmHg, p = 0.056), suggesting a trend toward improvement.

In healthy overweight or obese individuals with central adiposity, consuming 15% of the total daily calories from pecans (~42.5 g/2000 Kcal) for 4 weeks lowered both TC and LDLc, although the magnitude of change compared with the control diet (typical American diet) was marginally significant ( p = 0.056, p = 0.067, respectively).

Beta diversity through NMDS revealed no separation between contact lens wearers and control in females; however, there was a marginally significant difference in the male subgroup ( P = 0.056, F = 2.68, R 2 = 0.13; Fig. 4B ), suggesting a possible effect at the 10% significance level.

A significant difference was observed between the young and older adult groups (S = 1.109, p = 0.005), and a marginally significant difference was noted between the young and middle-aged groups (S = 0.490, p = 0.056).

Analysis of the random effects structure revealed that the Subject ID random intercept was marginally significant (Wald Z = 1.91, p = 0.056), accounting for 14% of the total variance (ICC = 0.14).

The difference in d′ among the five groups who had to retain memory for some duration (12 hours or more) was marginally significant ( F (4,75) = 2.42, MS e = 0.242, p = 0.056), with the largest pairwise difference in d′ between the PM–AM and PM–PM groups ( Fig. 5A ).

For younger adults, the group × occasion interaction was significant for the parcels of numerical tasks, F (1,143) = 7.48, P = 0.007, d = 0.33, and figural-spatial tasks, F (1,143) = 7.84, P = 0.006, d = 0.38, and marginally significant for the Raven, F (1,142) = 3.73, P = 0.056, d = 0.33.

Post hoc paired samples T-tests showed that this bias was significant for numerosity 12 [ t (1,28) = −16,89, p <0.001], numerosity 28 [ t (1,28) = −2.77, p = 0.01], numerosity 36 [ t (1,28) = −2.71, p = 0.01] but marginally significant for numerosity 44 [ t (1,28) = −1,99, p = 0.056] and not significant for numerosity 20 [ t (1,28) = 0.2, p = 0.84].

For flanker notes, a similar ANOVA revealed a marginally significant main effect of group, F (1, 30) = 3.94, p = .056, and the main effect of crowding was significant, F (1, 30) = 178.3, p < .0001.