Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Notably, non-responders exhibited significantly higher LRPS expression compared with responders ( Supplementary Figure S5A ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.015), while CCL20 showed a marginally significant upregulation trend in non-responders ( Supplementary Figure S5B ; Wilcoxon test, P = 0.056). 3.8 CCL20 promotes HCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and lactate production in vitro To elucidate the biological functions of CCL20 in HCC, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments using Hep3B and MHCC97H cell lines.
marginally significantP = 0.0561.1× alphagold
When comparing the TRP+ after four consecutive treatment days with the TRP+ condition of 1 day administration that was taken earlier in the same animals (experiment 2), an interaction effect was not found for TRP [Time × Treatment: F (2,8) = 3.52, NS ], but this interaction was marginally significant for the TRP/ΣLNAA ratio [ F (2,8) = 4.23, P = 0.056].
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
The difference in d′ among the five groups who had to retain memory for some duration (12 hours or more) was marginally significant ( F (4,75) = 2.42, MS e = 0.242, p = 0.056), with the largest pairwise difference in d′ between the PM–AM and PM–PM groups ( Fig. 5A ).
marginally significantp = .0561.1× alphagold
Though groups were relatively small in other studies, treatment responders showed significant rTMS-associated increases in left DLPFC tCho post treatment in one study ( p = .028, n = 6) ( Luborzewski et al., 2007 ) and a marginally significant increase of Cho/Cr in the left PFC in another study ( p = .056, n = 12 ( Zheng et al., 2010 ).
marginally significantP =0.0561.1× alphagold
A 6 (SNR) × 2 (group) mixed ANOVA on arcsine-transformed 22 accuracy revealed that older adults were less accurate than young adults irrespective of SNR ( F 1,30 =19.48, P <0.001), and accuracy increased with increasing SNR in both groups ( F 5,150 =399.10, P <0.001), with a marginally significant group × SNR interaction ( F 5,150 =2.21, P =0.056, Fig. 1b ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
When the difference between inspiration and expiration was considered, the lateral chest wall movement at carina level was improved significantly on right/convex side (p = 0.013) while marginally significant on left/concave side (p = 0.056). but there was no statistically significant change at the apical vertebra level.
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
A further difference in C6 was driven by marginally significant differences between the DCD and ADHD groups (DCD: M = −2.93, SD = 2.31, ADHD: M = −1.02, SD = 0.94, p = 0.056) and ADHD and control groups (Control: M = −2.64, SD = 1.43, p = 0.076; see Figure 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0561.1× alphagold
Comparing rating scores for cheese between the liking and wanting tasks, a multivariate ANOVA (MANOVA) then revealed a marginally significant group × task interaction (Roy’s GR 5,52 = 2.32, p = 0.056) suggesting that reduction in scores in Anti compared with Pro was significantly larger for the wanting than for the liking task.
The Neural Bases of Disgust for Cheese: An fMRI Study.
Front Hum Neurosci · 2016 · PMC5065955