“marginally significant”

Savings and insurance also have some substitutional relationship, with the protective effect of savings in households without commercial insurance being 1.7 times that in households with commercial insurance, with marginally significant between-group differences ( p = 0.055).

The results can also be interpreted this way: for sentences with grammatical syntax, the effect of Semantic Interpretability was marginally significant, estimated as 2.7% lower accuracy for uninterpretable sentences, p ≈ 0.055 ( Figure 4 top, GI versus GU).

This advantage persisted at 2 months ( P = 0.002) and remained marginally significant at 3 months ( P = 0.055), with continued superiority in pain control at 6 months ( P = 0.040).

In terms of infant birth weight, higher prenatal maternal anxiety was significantly associated with lower infant birth weight for male infants (β = −0.230, SE = 0.101, p = .022) and marginally significant for female infants (β = −0.223, SE = 0.117, p = .055).

The mean difference waves within 250–350 ms were significantly different from zero for children with ADHD in both conditions (low demand: t (44) = 5.955, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.888; high demand: t (44) = 5.930, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.884) and for TD children in the high-demand condition ( t (44) = 4.381, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.653); the difference was marginally significant for TD children in the low-demand condition ( t (44) = 1.968, p = 0.055, Cohen’s d = 0.293).

A marginally significant parameter suggested that reports of more calmness were associated with activity increases ( b = 1.031, p = 0.055).

After controlling for IQ scores, the reaction time differences between groups remained marginally significant (β = 6.3, t = 2.24; p = 0.055).

Within-subjects simple contrasts (alcohol exposure was used as reference) indicated that the interaction was marginally significant for alcohol exposure vs. baseline alcohol ( F [1, 38] = 3.91, p = 0.055) and significant for alcohol exposure vs. baseline water ( F [1, 38] = 5.75, p < 0.05).

A marginally significant, three‐way interaction was observed among electrode site, cue direction, and age group, F (2, 76) = 3.859, SS = 1.892, p = 0.055, ɳp 2 = 0.129.

Cases using end-to-end arterial anastomosis tended to show a higher rate of initial hyperemia than those using end-to-side, which difference was marginally significant ( p value = 0.055).

Meta-regression analysis showed a marginally significant inverse relationship between cumulative treatment duration and cognitive improvement (β = –0.001, p = 0.055, R 2 = 0.067).

A marginally significant correlation was observed, with a similar effect size and direction to those yielded by our initial analysis, r (96) = −0.19, p = 0.055.

When the relationship between laboratory parameters and scale scores was analyzed, a marginally significant negative correlation was found between TSH levels and Problem Scale scores ( r = − 0.256; p = 0.055).

Inflammation had a marginally significant effect on right-sided STS responses to viewing emotional facial expressions [ F (15,1) = 4.37, p = .055] with no significant influence on activity in any of the other face response regions reported in Table 1 .

We repeated the analysis for individual pride; the effect of language was found to be significant in Study 2a [ F (1, 291) = 6.38, P = 0.01, η p 2 = 0.02] and marginally significant in Study 2b [ F (1, 221) = 3.72, P = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.02], demonstrating opposite trends than those observed from in-group pride.

In Nova Scotia, the effect of training system was marginally significant for P. penetrans per g root ( p = 0.055) but with the Tall Spindle Axe training system supporting greater P. penetrans per g root than Upright Fruiting Offshoots or Kym Greene Bush training systems.

Differences in mean health utility scores were marginally significant (0.57 vs. 0.54, p = .055), though they were above clinically-relevant levels (i.e., greater than or equal to 0.03).

BMI demonstrated a small-to-moderate negative association with overall QoL (β = −0.205, p = 0.005), while the negative association with age was small and marginally significant (β = −0.134, p = 0.055).

A ninth species shows a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.055) and is included in the group of sexually dimorphic species.

Lower erythrocyte level showed a marginally significant association with macular oedema [beta-coefficient = −0.86, P value = 0.055].

Alone, ERQ-Reappraisal was a marginally significant predictor of reaction times, F (1, 83.4) = 3.79, p = .055.

Flow did not mediate the relationship between grit and any of the outcomes ( p > 0.05) and is marginally significant for the relationship between flow metacognition and burnout [ b = −0.12, SE = 0.06, p = 0.055, 95% CI (−0.22, −0.02), β = −0.09].

In the inclusive analysis, the three-way interaction was marginally significant ( F (1,33) = 3.95, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.107).

In the final model (model 3), the association with sedentary screen-based behavior was marginally significant ( p = 0.055).

When we repeated the analysis using the negative value of FIB-4 < 1.45 (rule out criterion for the presence of LF), we found an inverse association between low FIB-4 score and AEs at univariable OR: 0.45, 95%CI 0.24–0.86, p = 0.015, a marginally significant value at multivariable analysis (using Model A variables) with OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.30–1.01, p = 0.055).