“marginally significant”

The mean difference waves within 250–350 ms were significantly different from zero for children with ADHD in both conditions (low demand: t (44) = 5.955, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.888; high demand: t (44) = 5.930, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.884) and for TD children in the high-demand condition ( t (44) = 4.381, p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.653); the difference was marginally significant for TD children in the low-demand condition ( t (44) = 1.968, p = 0.055, Cohen’s d = 0.293).

Table 2 also shows a marginally significant effect for the PII (F (2,50) = 3.01; p = .055), and PIx3 concerning the high frequency band (F (2,50) = 2.99, p = .056); these parameters trended to be higher for the SFT than for the FT and SIT tasks.

Upon adjustment, individuals born in countries other than Greece were less likely to experience an MO of testing, although this association was marginally significant (aOR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.22–1.02; p = 0.055).

The difference between 3 and 30 s conditioned groups was significant under saline [ t (22) = 3.292, p < 0.005], and the reversed pattern of difference under 0.4 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT was marginally significant [ t (22) = 2.028, p = 0.055]. 3.1.3.

These differences at Time 2 were explained by a significant increase of positive interpretation bias in the OCAT group from Time 1 to Time 2 ( p = 0.025), whereas the Control group showed a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.055) (see Fig. 7 ). 2 Transfer effects to psychological measures Brooding rumination There was no significant main effect of Time, F (1, 44) = 1.53; p = 0.222; η p 2 = 0.034.

Data of two participants (one LL- and one UL-CRPS) were identified as influential (Cook’s distance > 0.15) 43 and had been removed from this analysis, however, retaining them in the data resulted in a consistent but marginally significant correlation ( p = 0.055; Supplementary Figure S6 ).

VEGF-C was predictive for benefit from adjuvant treatment with paclitaxel (E-T-CMF arm) for OS (test for interaction, Wald's P = 0.038), and marginally significant for DFS (test for interaction, Wald's P = 0.055).

The relative abundances of Aeromonas and Plesiomonas showed marginally significant increasing trends with PhIP dose ( p = 0.055 and p = 0.056).

The main effect for group was marginally significant (F (2,58) = 3.046, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.095).

However, the difference was marginally significant in the subgroup analysis of balanced studies (OR: 1.279, p = 0.055) and significant in the subgroup analysis of studies involving stage ≥III patients only (OR: 1.663, p = 0.005).

The overall regression model was marginally significant only, R 2 = 0.11, F (3, 62) = 2.70, MSE = 382.48, p = 0.055.

Similarly, feeling alienated maintained a marginally significant prediction of voting in the presence of self-transcendence, b = −0.206, SE = 0.108, z (1044) = −1.917, p = 0.055, and indirect effect analysis indicated that alienation was a mediator, b = 0.064, SE = 0.034, [0.002, 0.134].

The effect of repetition did not interact with hemisphere ( F (1, 29) = 0.10, p = 0.751), but the interaction was significant for laterality ( F (1, 29) = 7.15, p = 0.012) and marginally significant for anteriority ( F (3, 87) = 2.63, p = 0.055).

There was a marginally significant ( p = .055) interaction between adolescent mean positive emotion and positive emodiversity on caregiver anxious symptoms, which we cautiously interpreted given that the confidence interval did not contain 0.

We found increased abundances of Deferribacteres and Bacteroidetes in the aged mice both marginally significant ( p = 0.055, p = 0.11, respectively).

The parent-driven indirect effect where parental daily stress was linked to parental warmth on the same day, which in turn was linked to adolescent positive affect on the next day was marginally significant (−0.03, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.001], p = 0.055).

The results can also be interpreted this way: for sentences with grammatical syntax, the effect of Semantic Interpretability was marginally significant, estimated as 2.7% lower accuracy for uninterpretable sentences, p ≈ 0.055 ( Figure 4 top, GI versus GU).

The experimental group exhibited significant improvement in PFS ( p = 0.016) but marginally significant improvements in DCR ( p = 0.055).

Anemia was more common in AIDS patients (41/52 (78.8%)) than others, this difference was marginally significant ( P -value=0.055).

stronger left-lateralization in the MTL during the mental navigation task correlated with better outcome for the visuospatial task. For the RTLE group there was a marginally significant correlation between fMRI verbal encoding LI in the MTL ROI and CD change score (r=0.714; p=0.055), i.e. stronger left-lateralization correlated with better outcome in list learning (Fig. 3 ).

ving flags [χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 16.269, p < 0.001], using personification and choosing among different text-image relations [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 13.141, p = 0.001], using personification and using iconography in general [ χ 2 (2, N = 66) = 6.180, p = 0.046], with those instances involving people being marginally significant [ χ 2 (1, N = 66) = 3.681, p = 0.055], but still more significant than the remaining subtypes.

This interaction was marginally significant, F ( 1 , 350 ) = 3.70, p < 0.055, [ η p 2 ] = 0.010.

RT showed a marginally significant main effect of Stroop congruency ( F (2,38) = 3.47, ε = .77, p = .055, η p 2 = .16): participants responded slower in incongruent than in congruent trials ( t (19) = 2.42, p = .026, d = 0.54; M = 448 vs. 417 ms, 95% CI [4.16, 57.1]).

We found a marginally significant effect of Language Group ( B = -.73, SE = .38, p = .055), as well as significant effects of counting ( B = .30, SE = .05, p < .0001), and Age ( B = .15, SE = .03, p < .0001).

While the trends are similar across segments, linkers, and loops; the enrichment of mild variants in termini contributed to a marginally significant difference in the cumulative distribution as measured by the Anderson-Darling test (p = 0.055) ( S3 Fig ).