“marginally significant”

Availability for reading was a marginally significant predictor for learning, b = 0.4248, SE = 0.2110, p = 0.0542.

It should be noted that the study of Ozbeck et al [9] shows a marginally significant effect (p≤0.0543).

AST (p=0.0011) and alkaline phosphatase (p=0.0219) showed a significant decrease over time, while ALT exhibited a marginally significant decrease (p=0.0543).

In the case of average AUC values, there was a marginally significant correlation between baseline AUC values and CRS-R scores (ρ = 0.59, p = 0.0544), indicating a tendency for lower AUC values in patients with more severe symptoms.

Similar to the HG findings, along with the increased nodal strength and hyper‐connectivity identified by NBS, the second finding of a mid‐level, but marginally significant ( r = 0.5241, p = 0.0544) positive relationship between the nodal strength of the ITG and CARS total score suggests that the ITG may reflect the behavioral and clinical symptoms of ASD.

However, there was a marginally significant difference in the increment of serum 25(OH)D concentrations between the intervention group and the control group ( p = 0.0544).

The linear regression analysis suggests an average increase in prevalence of 1.39% per year, though this trend is marginally significant ( p = 0.0544) with a relatively low R-squared value of 0.0964, indicating substantial variability in the data not explained by time alone.

The viral set-point averages at weeks 20 and 24 were also reduced in IR-infected macaques as compared with IV-infected macaques but were marginally significant ( p = 0.0544 and 0.0509, respectively) (Figure 4a ).

Although a marginally significant ( p = 0.0544) difference was observed between the two groups with the percentage change in TBRmean levels, the mean reduction in TBRmean was 79.2% in the pCR group compared to 57.9% in the non-pCR group.

These differences vary between districts, with the two lower malaria transmission districts, Kazungula and Mumbwa, showing large reductions in the frequency of malaria diagnosis and treatment, whereas Mwense district showed a marginally significant increase in treatment post-RDT rollout (95.7 versus 129.0; F (1, 24) = 4.09, P = 0.0544) ( Table 1 ).

A marginally significant association of MAGEA positivity with high CD8+ lymphocytic infiltration was also observed (P=0.0545).

However, the CN group showed a tendency over time toward better overall efficacy, and the difference between the two groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.0545) (Table 3 ).

Other typically non-commercial (North America) asbestos fiber types such as tremolite, actinolite and anthophyllite often remained in the lungs of the cases associated with FT Classes 3 and 4, but apparently these asbestos fibers were not proportionally related to the primary asbestos exposures associated with the cases, based on the ANCOVA results represented in Figure 5 . In Figure 5 , the difference in slopes for FT Classes 1 and 2 were significant with a one-sided t -test, but were marginally significant with a two-sided test ( p = 0.0545).

We observed that Sema4D treatment led to a marginally significant increase in the mean distance traveled by GFP-Gephyrin scaffold assemblies prior to colocalizing ( p = 0.0545; Fig. 8 B ) and a marginally significant decrease in the average distance of GFP-Gephyrin to colocalization sites in the 10 min window prior to colocalization ( p = 0.0553; Fig. 8 C ).

The difference between different roots in terms of “apical foramen to foramen constriction distances” was marginally significant according to ANOVA [ P = 0.0545, Table 2 ]; the difference between roots in terms of “apical foramen-to-root apex distances” was significant [ANOVA P = 0.0000, Table 2 ].

Concerning the effect of pupil size, identical with the simple model, the large pupil bin showed a marginally significant effect compared to the reference category (β = 0.20102, SE = 0.10460, p = 0.0546), while the effects of the other two larger pupil bins were not significant (both p values > 0.05).

A significant increase in CD3-CD16 + CD56 + cells (natural killer cells; P = 0.0124) and a marginally significant decrease in CD4 + CD25 + cells (regulatory T cells; P = 0.0546) were observed three weeks after the first cycle of treatment in the combined stage.

Although added precipitation increased soil moisture in the +heat+precip treatment over that of the +heat alone (by 11.2% over the course of the study), especially in summer, only a marginally significant interactive treatment effect ( p = 0.0546 for heat × precip) on tall fescue abundance was identified (Table 2 ).

However, when pSS patients were divided into saliva flow rate subgroups, there was a marginally significant difference: a higher percentage of CD19 + CD20 − CD27 + CD38 + plasma cells in the <0.1 mL/1 min subgroup ( P = 0.05462) compared with that in the ≥0.1mL/1min subgroup (data were not shown).

In patients with TNBC ( n = 84), high MELK mRNA expression showed marginally significant trend for poor OS ( P = 0.0547), PFS ( P = 0.0821), or DMFS ( P = 0.0587; Fig. 1D ).

After 6 years, a marginally significant reduction in the primary cardiovascular outcome (10.9% vs. 14.9%, hazard ratio 0.785, p = 0.0547) and a significant decrease in the composite secondary endpoint (8.0% vs. 11.3%, hazard ratio 0.734, p = 0.0306) was observed.

The effects of neuropathy and retinopathy were slightly reduced in the adjusted models but still significant for neuropathy ( P = 0.01) and marginally significant for retinopathy ( P = 0.0547).

The mediation effect of the two functional connectivities were marginally significant ( a1 * b1 , coefficient = 0.00543, z = 0.00356, P = 0.0547, a2 * b2 = 0.00421, z = 0.00297, P = 0.0623).

Even though the difference was marginally significant (p = 0.0548), more girls reported that their scholastic achievement was mid-high (25.12%), middle (31.24%), or mid-low (23.72%) levels compared to boys.

In αCaMKII +/− mice, the decoding accuracies for speed were significantly higher than those expected by chance [paired t test, t (4) = 3.965, P = 1.66 × 10 −2 ; on average, 57.8 ± 9.6 cells are used for decoding], and those for position and motion direction were better than chance to a marginally significant degree [paired t test, position, t (4) = 2.687, P = 0.0549; motion direction, t (4) = 2.711, P = 0.05349].