“marginally significant”

The increase in interference effects in accuracy with the number of the SL G alleles was also significant or marginally significant in all four distracter conditions in run1 (threat: r = 0.195, p = 0.054; neutral: r = 0.170, p = 0.082; scrambled: r = 0.192, p = 0.057; null: r = 0.218, p = 0.036; all one-tailed correlations).

Performance IQ was marginally significant (t (26) = −2.016, P = 0.054), with larger scores observed in TD children.

The difference for the medium group was marginally significant ( P =0.054).

iAUC was significantly higher after ingestion of ArgB compared to CB ( p = 0.001) while the difference between BCAAsB and CB iAUCs was marginally significant ( p = 0.054, Table 3 ).

The ANOVA on inter-bout-interval data resulted in a marginally significant main effect of Day 5 Treatment ( F 1 , 24 = 4.01, p = 0.054; Supplementary Figure 3C ) but no other main effects or interactions ( F ’s < 1.94, p ’s > 0.05).

Yet despite these differences in mean contribution by sleep condition, the standard deviations were high enough that the difference was not significant (two tailed p = .303), though marginally significant with cohort 1 included ( p = .054).

We found a significant main effect for condition [ F (2, 18) = 20.1, p = 0.0001, ή 2 = 0.7], a marginally significant effect for Type [ F (1, 19) = 4.226, p = 0.054, ή 2 = 0.18] and a significant interaction of Type and Condition [ F (2, 18) = 14.624, p < 0.0001, ή 2 = 0.6].

KRAS mutation status in tumor was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

The test on RTs became marginally significant if we used a two-tailed t test ( p = .054), but we felt that a one-tailed test was more appropriate because of our clear prediction.

Cosinor analysis detected no significant rhythmicity in the 6-meals-a-day groups ( p = 0.139) and a marginally significant rhythm in the ad libitum group ( p = 0.054) ( Figure 4 D). 2.7.

However, we did find a marginally significant dose-response relationship for the number of completed modules and anxiety symptoms at 6 months ( b = − 0.204, p = 0 .054), indicating that adherence increases as anxiety symptoms decrease. 3.6 Moderation Table 5 shows the group × moderator interaction effects on the MHC-SF for each pre-specified moderator (age, gender, education, positive and negative life-events, extraversion, neuroticism and conscientiousness).

With non-naive participants removed, the correlation between AOT scores and scratch card gambling frequency was attenuated and became marginally significant, r (153) = −.155, p = .054.

The interaction term was marginally significant ( β = 0.03, p = 0.054).

The path from environmental sensitivity to pro-environmental behavior was marginally significant (β = 0.211, p = 0.054).

For the overnight study, performance change on the WPT was marginally significant [ t 23 = −2.03, P = 0.054, d = −0.41, 95% CI (−0.81, 0.02); Schabus et al ., 2004 ; Fig. 1 a].

This difference is marginally significant, z = 1.93, p = .054.

The main effect of time in during-writing theta wave attained significance ( F (1,14) = 12.211, P < 0.01), and it was qualified by a marginally significant time × group interaction ( F (1, 14) = 4.414, P = 0.054).

Support for Sociopolitically Inspired Solutions to the Organ Shortage A similar ANCOVA on support resulted in main effects of registration status, F (2, 1214) = 207.06, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.26; and sociopolitical viewpoint, F (2, 1214) = 7.49, p < 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.01; as well as a marginally significant interaction between these two variables, F (4, 1214) = 2.34, p = 0.054, partial η 2 = 0.01.

A marginally significant group difference in time between T1 and T2 was found, indicating a longer period between measurements in the NC group (p = .054).

The adjusted postcontrast T1 values showed a marginally significant, strong positive correlation with the AST level (r = 0.872, P = 0.054).

Treatment with HTRA1 was associated with a marginally significant increase in intracellular Ca 2+ levels (Supplementary Figure S3A , F = 3.735, p = 0.0541), while the addition of DAG1 ectodomain and full‐length GPC5 had no significant effects (Supplementary Figure S3B,C : DAG1, F = 1.170, p = 0.3963; GPC5, F = 1.511, p = 0.2770).

1 C ) and marginally significant differences in multiple-site trial data ( p = 0.0541; Fig. 1 D ).

After transformation, in spite of the small sample size (n = 9) the correlation coefficient of log CD34 and CFU still remained marginally significant ( p = 0.0541) with a R 2 value of 0.4328, suggesting a possible correlation of BM CFU recovery with CD34+ cells recovery ( S2 Fig ).

Availability for reading was a marginally significant predictor for learning, b = 0.4248, SE = 0.2110, p = 0.0542.

The total effect (c path) was marginally significant ( β = .04, p = .0542), and the direct effect (c′ path) was not significant ( β = .03, p = .1195).