“marginally significant”

BFOM was a marginally significant mediator between structural barriers and KOOS-12 (coeff=−0.36, 95% CI=(−0.86, –0.02); p=0.054).

Although marginally significant (p = 0.054), dogs consuming raw food presented E. coli resistant to a higher number of antimicrobial families.

The relationship between biomass and maize root colonization intensity in excess water treatment was marginally significant (r 2 adj = 0.0567, F 1, 47 = 3.885, P = 0.054).

For the perceived emotional intensity of AM events, the effect of narrative perspective was marginally significant, p = .054, based on the p -value of 0.05 criterion.

Nevertheless, for the adjusted analysis, the relation of THRB delta Ct with BMI and its relation to weight were marginally significant, ( P = 0.054 and P = 0.056, respectively).

Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons indicated HR-ASD looked at the referent less than LR controls (marginally significant at p = 0.054) and HR-TYP ( p < 0.001).

The relationship between these variables was marginally significant, P = 0.054.

In the case of the writing/research skills scale, a change—from a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.054, r = 0.35) to a significant difference at the final test ( p = 0.040, r = 0.37)—was observed.

The gain in performance using BA variables compared to clinical variables and laboratory parameters was significant for GBSA ( p = 0.036) and marginally significant for RSF ( p = 0.054).

The results of a two-way ANOVA showed a statistically significant effect of psychiatric disorders ( p < 0.001) and a marginally significant effect of genetic status ( p = 0.054) on the total AAS score.

There was marginally significant interaction between the anesthetic techniques and postoperative recurrence formation ( P = .054).

Two‐tailed t ‐tests performed separately for each age group revealed a marginally significant increase of EA‐CSF/TCV ratio in the ASD group only in the youngest age group ( t (40) = 1.98, p = 0.054, Cohen's d = 0.61, Figure 3C ). 3.3.

A marginally significant interaction of Time × Maternal CM load ( t Interaction = −0.77, p = 0.054, η 2 p < 0.01) indicated that women with higher CM load had lower SEA level than women with lower CM load at t 0 ( p FDR < 0.001), while these differences were not found at t 2 ( p FDR = 0.333).

However, compost type exhibited a marginally significant effect on nosZ clade II ( p = 0.054), with the relative abundance in SA being higher in BM than in M treatment ( p < 0.05). 4 Discussion Compared to M, BM has been found to reduce CO 2 and N 2 O emissions; yet the degree in reduction is soil-texture dependent ( Gao et al., 2023 ; Yuan et al., 2017 ).

In the domain of knowledge transfer, the pedagogical agent showed a marginally significant main effect [ F (1, 108) = 3.809, p = 0.054, η 2 = 0.034], whereas the main effect of emotional feedback was not significant [ F (1, 108) = 1.519, p = 0.220, η 2 = 0.014].

Performance IQ was marginally significant (t (26) = −2.016, P = 0.054), with larger scores observed in TD children.

Model fit improvements were marginally significant when fixed level 2 and level 1 effects of enjoyment were added in step 3 ( p = 0.054), fixed level 2 and level 1 effects of beat salience were added in step 5 ( p = 0.073), and fixed level 2 effect of total music reward was added in step 6 ( p = 0.099).

A marginally significant group difference in time between T1 and T2 was found, indicating a longer period between measurements in the NC group (p = .054).

36.0 months, HR 2.43, 95% CI 0.83–7.15, P =0.087); in the multivariable model, the effect remained marginally significant (HR 3.01, 95% CI 0.98–9.20, P =0.054) ( Table 2 ).

The indirect effect through implicit affective response to vaccines was marginally significant (indirect effect: 0.02; P = 0.054), while the cognitive pathway was not significant ( P = 0.141) using the percentage of Immunity training theme mentions as a mediator.

The main effect of time in during-writing theta wave attained significance ( F (1,14) = 12.211, P < 0.01), and it was qualified by a marginally significant time × group interaction ( F (1, 14) = 4.414, P = 0.054).

By contrast, overall vocabulary scores were strongly correlated with how many words children learned r ( 34 ) = .464 , p = .004 , and as expected, older children learned more words than younger children, though this was only a marginally significant difference, t ( 35 ) = 1.99 , p = .054 (see Fig. 5 ).

There was a marginally significant change over time (Time x Value: F (6.2, 564.19) = 2.06, p = .054, η p 2 = 0.022).

Comparable analyses demonstrated a marginally significant relationship between pre- to post-treatment changes in the covert fear vs neutral contrasts and PTSD symptom slopes for modularity (B = .29, t = 2.09; p = .054), but not global efficiency (B = -.21; t = -1.59; p = .13).

The factor time was marginally significant, F (1,40) = 2.81, P = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.07, pointing at habituation over time.