“marginally significant”

High-income individuals showed a marginally significant result (exp.[coef.] = 0.457, P = 0.054).

All the factor loadings of the CPV latent variable were significant, except for one of the indicators of the children’s report, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

N170 Amplitude The ANOVA for N170 peak amplitude ( Table 4 and Figure 5 ) also showed a significant main effect of emotion types [ F (1,44)=6.62, p =0.014, η 2 =0.13] and a marginally significant four-way interaction among emotion type, cue validity, electrode location, and age [ F (1,44)=3.93, p =0.054, η 2 =0.08].

Performance IQ was marginally significant (t (26) = −2.016, P = 0.054), with larger scores observed in TD children.

A mixed ANOVA with Group, Trial type and Block as factors revealed a marginally significant main effect of group [ F (1,10) = 4.78, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.32], and significant main effects of trial type [ F (1,10) = 39.37, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.80], and block [ F (17,170) = 19.31, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.66].

Translation explained only 3.6% additional variance after lexical inference was controlled for, but the effect was marginally significant ( p = .054).

The main effect of Emotion was found to be significant F (2, 219) = 55.44 p < 0.001 (partial η 2 = 0.43) and the interaction of Group and Emotion was found to be marginally significant F (2, 219) = 2.57 p = 0.054 (partial η 2 = 0.03; Figure 7 ).

Analysis of the P2 component in the central channels revealed a marginally significant main effect of time [ F ( 1, 27) = 4.075, p = 0.054], indicating a larger P2 at post-stimulation (4.779 ± 0.519 μV) than at pre-stimulation (4.148 ± 0.519 μV).

pallidus for cyt b show a marginally significant difference between the mean number of haplotypes (2.50 and 1.90, respectively; U =490.5, P =0.054) and a strongly significant difference between mean number of polymorphic sites per locality (3.89 and 1.20, respectively; U =543.0, P =0.007).

The main effect of STN-DBS was marginally significant [ F (1,63) = 3.85, p = 0.054], with patients on DBS showing a higher drift rate.

The proportion of individual nonselective deposit feeders also showed a positive relationship with increasing latitude that was statistically marginally significant ( r = .266, p = .054, data not shown).

Improvements in sleep quality and quality of life A marginally significant improvement ( p = 0.054) in overall sleep quality assessment was observed at visit 6.

When individuals were pooled by coral host taxon, global differentiation between samples was small but significant for the microsatellite data ( F ST = 0.002; P <0.001) and small and marginally significant for the mtDNA (Φ ST = 0.007, P = 0.054; Table 4 ).

A 2 × 3 analysis of variance showed no main effect of pain group, F (2,1520) = 1.42, P = 0.243, a marginally significant effect of sex, F (1,1520) = 3.70, P = 0.054, where females (mean = 24.73, SD = 18.47) scored slightly higher than males (mean = 23.03, SD = 16.02), and no interaction, F (2,1520) = 1.48, P = 0.229. 3.3.

The main effect of time in during-writing theta wave attained significance ( F (1,14) = 12.211, P < 0.01), and it was qualified by a marginally significant time × group interaction ( F (1, 14) = 4.414, P = 0.054).

The path from environmental sensitivity to pro-environmental behavior was marginally significant (β = 0.211, p = 0.054).

In addition, a marginally significant Condition by Learning Phase interaction emerged for Fz ( F (1,48) = 3.90; p = .054, ηp 2 = .07).

The PN-only group also had a significant effect on viral suppression at 6 months (β = 0.610, OR = 1.85, p = 0.035) and a marginally significant effect on being in care at 6 months (β = 0.660, OR = 1.93, p = 0.054), compared to the TAU group.

We found a marginally significant source x outcome interaction effect (F 1,12 = 4.55, p = 0.054).

Employment status differences were marginally significant ( p = 0.054) with a larger number of students in the favorable food environment.

There was a marginally significant association between PHQ-9 scores and literacy (−0.399, p < 0.054). 4.

The interaction between valence and the regulation strategy was marginally significant, F (1, 50) = 3.91, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.07.

In the case of the writing/research skills scale, a change—from a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.054, r = 0.35) to a significant difference at the final test ( p = 0.040, r = 0.37)—was observed.

In univariate analysis, hormone secretion was significant prognostic factor (p = 0.042) and cavernous sinus extension was marginally significant factor (p = 0.054) for adverse local control.

The results showed a significant main effect for postoperative day (F 5,150 = 95.32, p <0.001), a significant POd × group interaction (F 15,150 = 2.57, p = 0.002), and a marginally significant main effect for group (F 3,30 = 2.85, p = 0.054).