“marginally significant”

There was also a marginally significant association between HMI level and reported occupation of hunter vs occupation of “not-hunter” ( χ 2 p-value = 0.054, df = 2), ( Fig 2B ).

This effect was marginally significant in the example condition as well, t (28) = 1.66, p = 0.054, and d = 0.308.

Nevertheless, participants who wear dentures tended to have higher RCI with marginally significant difference (p = 0.054).

This difference is marginally significant in July 2020 (condition 3: M = 3.38, SD = 1.08; β = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.00, 0.98], P = 0.054, d = 0.45).

The use of TDF was marginally significant factor for renal toxicity (p=0.054) in univariate analysis, but was insignificant (p=0.122) in multivariate logistic analysis.

As can be seen in Table 2 , across both groups there was a marginally significant relationship between age and the initial perception of risk, E(q 1 ), r (43) = −0.290, p = 0.054, such that older individuals had higher initial perceptions of risk.

We found a significant main effect for condition [ F (2, 18) = 20.1, p = 0.0001, ή 2 = 0.7], a marginally significant effect for Type [ F (1, 19) = 4.226, p = 0.054, ή 2 = 0.18] and a significant interaction of Type and Condition [ F (2, 18) = 14.624, p < 0.0001, ή 2 = 0.6].

Younger children were more likely to be underweight; however, this association was marginally significant ( p = 0.054), suggesting a possible decline in prevalence with increasing age.

The main effect of time in during-writing theta wave attained significance ( F (1,14) = 12.211, P < 0.01), and it was qualified by a marginally significant time × group interaction ( F (1, 14) = 4.414, P = 0.054).

A marginally significant interaction of Time × Maternal CM load ( t Interaction = −0.77, p = 0.054, η 2 p < 0.01) indicated that women with higher CM load had lower SEA level than women with lower CM load at t 0 ( p FDR < 0.001), while these differences were not found at t 2 ( p FDR = 0.333).

There was a marginally significant trend for the lower methadone dose in drinkers than nondrinkers ( P = 0.054); interestingly, when weight was considered, a significantly lower WMD in drinkers than nondrinkers was detected ( P < 0.001).

Preliminary analyses showed a significant interaction between sex and BMI category with respect to the somatization score ( p = 0.003) and a marginally significant interaction between sex and BMI category for somatization case status ( p = 0.054).

Adding EF scale accounted for an additional 6.4% of the variance and this change was marginally significant, F (1, 39) = 3.96, p = .054.

There is, however, a marginally significant interaction between measurement points and SES clusters in the Satisfaction with Life Scale [ F (2, 182) = 2.97, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.032].

For ICF, the results suggest a marginally significant interaction between the group and training periods, F (1,30) = 4.17, p = 0.054, η 2 = 0.167.

Additionally, CKD reached marginally significant (OR=3•58, 95% CI: 0•98–13•06, P = 0•054) in multivariable analysis for female.

Marginally significant differences were found for CD68+ macrophages (low-grade vs. high-grade tumors: 1.94% [IQR: 0.65–5.16%] vs. 3.56% [IQR: 0.98–10.54%]; p = .054) and CD3 + T-cells (low-grade vs. high-grade tumors: 1.87% [0.62–5.15%]; p = .063).

A more than 1+ score of Ki-67 was a marginally significant factor ( p = 0.054; 2.74 [0.99–7.79]), and BCT score was the only significant factor related to tumor response in the multivariate analysis ( p = 0.016; 4.18 [1.34–14.28]).

3d ; a marginally significant [ P = 0.054] date × warming × herbivory reduction interaction effect in Supplementary Table 7 ), which likely resulted from the larger size and higher transpiration of plants in these plots.

Of the 46 adults for whom sex can be determined, females constitute 65% while males constitute 35%, a marginally significant difference (binomial test p = 0.054).

KRAS mutation status in tumor was marginally significant ( p = 0.054).

Additionally, patients with PD-L1 positive (TPS ≥ 1%) had a higher pCR rate (nominal P = 0.025) and a marginally significant higher MPR rate (nominal P = 0.054).

The interaction between Time and Group was marginally significant, F (1, 60) = 3.87, p = 0.054, η 2 p = 0.061.

The relationship between the satisfaction to work for one’s organization and the degree to which one’s work is manageable is positive at the 0.05 significance level for all regions except Region B, where the relationship is marginally significant ( p = 0.054 ).

72.44 mL/m 2 ± 25.44; p=0.0000) and marginally significant right ventricle systolic pressure (42.29mmHg ± 17.53 vs. 39.59mmHg ± 15.61; p=0.0540) Conclusion Our results indicated that methamphetamine users had echocardiogram findings with decreased ejection fraction and increased left ventricular mass index, end-diastolic volume index, and right ventricular systolic pressure consistent with worse dilated cardiomyopathy comparison to non-users.