Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .0541.1× alphagold
None of the simple effects of non-esteem identification were significant (all p s > .13), but when we decomposed this interaction by salience condition, the two-way interaction between education and non-esteem identification was marginally significant when education was salient ( B = −.42, SE = .217, p = .054, 95% CI [−0.846, 0.007]) but not when it was not salient ( B = .36, SE = .243, p = .14, 95% CI [−0.115, 0.841]).
marginally significantp value = 0.0541.1× alphagold
The results with both incident and prevalent cohorts of the Nun Study show that ApoE4 promotes the cognitive decline of a subject, in that an ApoE4 carrier is expected to have a relatively longer time of the transition from MCI back to intact cognition ( p value = 0.011); a higher risk of being in MCI, which is marginally significant ( p value = 0.054); and a shorter time of the transition from MCI to dementia ( p value = 0.032), compared to a non-carrier.
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
Pooled analysis of studies using Knox tests For childhood leukaemia at time of diagnosis, a pooled analysis of 16 individual samples from 15 original studies [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 38 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 84 ] showed marginally significant space–time clustering ( p = 0.054) with an overall excess of close pairs of S = 1.1% (Table 2 , Fig. 2 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
A marginally significant interaction of Time × Maternal CM load ( t Interaction = −0.77, p = 0.054, η 2 p < 0.01) indicated that women with higher CM load had lower SEA level than women with lower CM load at t 0 ( p FDR < 0.001), while these differences were not found at t 2 ( p FDR = 0.333).
marginally significantp = 0.0541.1× alphagold
The comparisons between high-confident responses (confidence rating of 5) and less-confident responses (confidence rating below 5) in false alarms show a marginally significant difference [ F (1, 34.965) = 4.663; p = 0.054; η 2 p = 0.298] between the mean dilation to high-confident responses (2.9%) and less-confident responses (−0.78%), as depicted in Figure 5 .