In contrast, Southern European systems showed a smaller, marginally significant negative baseline effect (β = −3.43, p = 0.054). 3.4.
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
A greater number of nutrition support contacts through Week 4 was also significantly associated with at least 5% weight loss by Week 16 ( p = 0.012) and a marginally significant factor associated with at least 10% body weight loss ( p = 0.054).
Cosinor analysis detected no significant rhythmicity in the 6-meals-a-day groups ( p = 0.139) and a marginally significant rhythm in the ad libitum group ( p = 0.054) ( Figure 4 D). 2.7.
This difference is marginally significant in July 2020 (condition 3: M = 3.38, SD = 1.08; β = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.00, 0.98], P = 0.054, d = 0.45).
The relationship between physical HRQOL and total MVPA was marginally significant ( p =0.054) and followed a similar pattern to that seen in weekly minutes of total PA.
However, we did find a marginally significant three-way interaction effect between time, social distance and construal level ( F (1,150) = 3.76, p = .054, p η 2 = .024).
The interaction between Time and Group was marginally significant, F (1, 60) = 3.87, p = 0.054, η 2 p = 0.061.
The small difference in number of fixations between words and pseudowords was marginally significant; W = 703, p = .054.
None of the simple effects of non-esteem identification were significant (all p s > .13), but when we decomposed this interaction by salience condition, the two-way interaction between education and non-esteem identification was marginally significant when education was salient ( B = −.42, SE = .217, p = .054, 95% CI [−0.846, 0.007]) but not when it was not salient ( B = .36, SE = .243, p = .14, 95% CI [−0.115, 0.841]).
The effects of PM(10) were marginally significant (RR = 1.06; p = 0.054) for respiratory mortality but not for the other outcomes (p > 0.135).
High-income individuals showed a marginally significant result (exp.[coef.] = 0.457, P = 0.054).
There also was a marginally significant correlation between ratings of masked faces and attitudes towards others wearing or not wearing masks ( r = .14, p = .054).
There was a marginally significant association between PHQ-9 scores and literacy (−0.399, p < 0.054). 4.
The correlation between non-agricultural employment and wage income (Path b) is marginally significant (b = 0.024, z = 1.925, p = 0.054).
The results with both incident and prevalent cohorts of the Nun Study show that ApoE4 promotes the cognitive decline of a subject, in that an ApoE4 carrier is expected to have a relatively longer time of the transition from MCI back to intact cognition ( p value = 0.011); a higher risk of being in MCI, which is marginally significant ( p value = 0.054); and a shorter time of the transition from MCI to dementia ( p value = 0.032), compared to a non-carrier.
On multivariate analysis, strong TG2 expression was a marginally significant prognostic indicator for Fuhrman nuclear grade and TNM staging (p=.054).
Pooled analysis of studies using Knox tests For childhood leukaemia at time of diagnosis, a pooled analysis of 16 individual samples from 15 original studies [ 21 , 24 , 25 , 27 , 38 , 42 , 44 , 46 , 47 , 49 , 50 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 84 ] showed marginally significant space–time clustering ( p = 0.054) with an overall excess of close pairs of S = 1.1% (Table 2 , Fig. 2 ).
Younger age at the time of diagnosis, the other most important prognostic factor in MMD besides PCA stenosis, was marginally significant by univariate analysis ( p =0.054) and not significant by multivariate evaluation.
A marginally significant interaction of Time × Maternal CM load ( t Interaction = −0.77, p = 0.054, η 2 p < 0.01) indicated that women with higher CM load had lower SEA level than women with lower CM load at t 0 ( p FDR < 0.001), while these differences were not found at t 2 ( p FDR = 0.333).
Results of the LIWC analysis Step 1: Level of Engagement (LOE) There were no significant main effects of Role or Stage ( p s > 0.1), but a marginally significant interaction emerged, F (1, 59) = 3.87, p = 0.054, η 2 = 0.06.
The indirect effect through implicit affective response to vaccines was marginally significant (indirect effect: 0.02; P = 0.054), while the cognitive pathway was not significant ( P = 0.141) using the percentage of Immunity training theme mentions as a mediator.
As can be seen in Table 2 , across both groups there was a marginally significant relationship between age and the initial perception of risk, E(q 1 ), r (43) = −0.290, p = 0.054, such that older individuals had higher initial perceptions of risk.
The comparisons between high-confident responses (confidence rating of 5) and less-confident responses (confidence rating below 5) in false alarms show a marginally significant difference [ F (1, 34.965) = 4.663; p = 0.054; η 2 p = 0.298] between the mean dilation to high-confident responses (2.9%) and less-confident responses (−0.78%), as depicted in Figure 5 .
A marginally significant difference was found between the pre- and post-dermal suction SWV values at 0° ( r = 0.39, P = 0.054, 95% CI [−0.521, 0.004]).
The remaining 35% of the overall impact of the incident 5 were estimated to be marginally significant in a longer-term basis (step function: ω = 61.9, 95%CI = −0.9, 124.8, p = 0.054).