“marginally significant”

We also found a marginally significant negative correlation between the coverage of microstate D and prosociality [ R (53) = -0.265, p = 0.051].

The only IgG subclass that showed a marginally significant difference was IgG2 ( p = 0.051), with higher levels observed in the control group than in the LTBI group.

May showed a marginally significant decrease in species count (Estimate = − 0.6145, p = 0.051).

Participants who completed T12 showed significant improvement in planned future dimension of the RSA ( P <0.05) and marginally significant improvement in HDRS score ( P =0.051) (Fig. 2 ).

For adolescents in the CP Group, a marginally significant difference in sadness between baseline and post-discussion was found ( t (269) = −1.96, p = .051), with higher sadness scores following the discussion ( Me = 148, SD = 16.1) compared to baseline ( Me = 172, SD = 16.2).

We also observed an interaction effect between “comorbid anxiety disorder” and “sex” on 20:4 LPA [F(1,82) = 4.75; p = 0.032], and this was also marginally significant for total LPA [F(1,88) = 3.92; p = 0.051].

The difference in average sensitivity between CRT ( M = 1.45, SD = 1.14) and LCD ( M = 1.76, SD = 1.1) was again small, but we observed a marginally significant main effect of display type, F (1, 23) = 4.24, p = 0.051, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{G}^{2}$$\end{document} η G 2 = 0.014, indicating better performance on LCD.

Also a marginally significant Group × Lag interaction was found, F (3, 78) = 2.71, MSE = 51.77, p = .051, η 2 p = .09, such that particularly at lags 2 and 3, non-blinkers seemed to show fewer order reversals than blinkers did.

An additional three-way linear mixed-effects analysis revealed significant interaction effects of group × FNC × time for the connection between the left DMN-C and DAN-B ( P = 0.028), along with a marginally significant group × time interaction ( P = 0.051).

Marginally significant negative correlation ( P = 0.051) between Tajima's D and this latter summary statistic suggests that it captures well the genomic impacts of demography across this period of time.

The marginally significant correlation between charitable donations and logo fixation duration ( r s = 0.201, p = 0.051) hints that experienced donors may engage slightly more with organisational branding, warranting investigation with larger samples.

Wean age tended to decrease 305-d milk yield (Estimate = −22.31, SEM = 11.46, P = 0.051, marginally significant), accounting for 0.04% of the variance ( Table 6 ).

The interaction between probe type and stimulus novelty condition was marginally significant, F (1, 63) = 3.94, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.06, resulting from a greater PI effect in the repeated ( M = 0.07) than unique ( M = 0.03) condition.

There were 1,203 participants with diabetes followed up regarding their treatment behavior. Higher POS were likely to seek appropriate diabetes treatment after adjustment with personal and occupational factors ( p =0.032) but became marginally significant when adjusted with night shift status ( p =0.051).

As shown in Figure 7 , the average fibrotic scores of metformin(+) CRC were lower than those from metformin(–) tumors with a marginally significant difference ( P = .051). 4 DISCUSSION Epidemiological studies suggested that metformin not only reduces the risk of developing CRC but also may improve the outcome of patients with DM and CRC, especially for patients who have undergone curative surgery for stage II and stage III tumors, 25 , 2

RDS at 24 hours and RDS-related mortality were significantly reduced in the lucinactant group, and there was a marginally significant reduction in overall mortality (p = 0.051) in the lucinactant group as well. 34 The only head-to-head comparison of beractant with lucinactant for the prevention of RDS suggests that lucinactant has a slight advantage in clinically important short term outcomes over beractant, including the clinical diagnosis of RDS at 24 hours and RDS-related mortality.

Furthermore, a marginally significant association was also identified between the presence of the chrA gene and MAR index values exceeding 0.2 ( p = 0.051) in our study.

The two-way interaction of social distance X outcome was marginally significant [ F (2, 117) = 3.05, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.05].

Results showed that the correlation between predictive scores and residuals was marginally significant ( r = 0.20, p = 0.051), suggesting that the current predictive model is largely associated with state anxiety, independent of trait anxiety.

Results Two participants who incorrectly responded to the target article comprehension questions were removed from analyses (the significance and direction of results do not differ if these individuals are included, with one exception: the experimental condition x timepoint interaction for the general perceived anti-White discrimination analysis was marginally significant, F (2, 224) = 3.02, p = .051, η p 2 = 0.03).

In an analogous way, those who had low alcohol consumption were 59% (p<0.01) more likely to report bad/very bad health, whereas for those with high alcohol consumption, reporting bad/very bad health was marginally significant (OR=2.05; p=0.051).

Additionally, the flanker congruency effect for accuracy demonstrated a marginally significant positive correlation with NRT, r = .19, p = .051, suggesting that individuals with greater susceptibility to interference may be more prone to NRT.

Descriptives The prevalence of AjD was 25.6% ( n = 81), with a marginally significant higher proportion of women (30.7%) being diagnosed than men (21.1%; χ 2 (1) = 3.80, p = .051).

When we look at the difference between the two tasks for the two age groups separately, we only found a significant difference between the control sentences of the ABT and the TVJT for the five-year-olds (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, n =13; T =23; p =.049) and a marginally significant difference for the three-year-olds (Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test, n =13; T =23; p =.051).

Two way ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of age ( F (1,8) = 8.322, p = 0.02) and a marginally significant age by treatment interaction ( F (1,8) = 5.283, p = 0.051).