“marginally significant”

Moreover, the simple main effects of flow direction on the 4–6- and 7–9-month-old infants and on the adults were significant ( F (1,114) = 26.52, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.19; F (1,114) = 19.71, p < 0.001 , η p 2 = 0.15; and F (1,114) = 10.75, p = 0.002 , η p 2 = 0.09; respectively); it was marginally significant on the 10–12-month-olds ( F (1,114) = 3.89, p = 0.051 , η p 2 = 0.13).

19.1%, 95%CI: 14.8%–24.3%), with marginally significant heterogeneity between these two groups ( p = .051).

After adjusting for covariates, the CSS benefit of ovarian conservation was marginally significant ( P = 0.051), and the OS benefit was still significant ( P = 0.006).

Interestingly, this effect was more pronounced in the Simon task than in the Eriksen task, as reflected in a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 31) = 4.10, p = . 051, η p 2 = .12 (with p = . 812 and η p 2 < . 01 for the main effect of task).

In contrast, honey bees showed a marginally significant difference in pollen deposition per visit between downward (29.8 ± 3.0, N = 45) and upward flowers (21.9 ± 2.5, N = 33; Wald χ 2 = 3.808, p = 0.051; Figure 3b ). 3.4 Effects of Flower Orientation on Pollen Viability and Stigma Receptivity Pollen viability in P. cyrtonema was significantly affected by sampling time, floral orientation and weather conditions (sunlight vs. rainwater exposure; Table 1 ; Figure 4 ).

Moreover, patients with a caudal epidural block showed a marginally significant shorter hospital stay (0.37 days vs. 0.86 days; p = 0.051).

The same pattern was found for high probability targets (19.5%, 95% CI [15.3,24.5]), and this is marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

Supporting this impression, the 2 x 2 (Electrode x Group) MANOVA revealed significant main effects of Group ( F (1, 62) = 4.31, p = .042, ƞ p 2 = .07), and Electrode ( F (1, 62) = 15.42, p = .001, Wilks’ Lambda = .801, ƞ p 2 = .20), that were modified by a marginally significant interaction of Group and Electrode ( F (1, 62) = 3.97, p = .051, Wilks’ Lambda = .940, ƞ p 2 = .06).

The main effect of time since miscarriage was marginally significant ( F (3, 237) = 2.63, p = .051) while the interaction between time since miscarriage and childlessness ( F (3, 237) = 2.22, p = .087) was not.

Additionally, the three-way interaction of anger or frustration reactions × family regularity × gender was significant ( β = 0.11, p = 0.046) in the analysis of child oppositional behavior and marginally significant in the analysis of child aggression ( β = 0.10, p = 0.051).

As for the balanced trials, group effect was marginally significant, F (1,38) = 4.07, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.09 and math anxiety did not interact with number of digits ( p = 0.75).

Early graduates rated commitment to the profession higher than recent graduates did, while commitment to the organisation was marginally significant for the year of graduation ( p = 0.051).

Marginally significant negative correlation ( P = 0.051) between Tajima's D and this latter summary statistic suggests that it captures well the genomic impacts of demography across this period of time.

2.0%), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

While a marginally significant difference in phonological fluency was found pre-training between the dyslexic and control groups [ t (19) = 2.08, p = 0.051], no such difference was found following the training.

We found a marginally significant main effect of gossip, F (1, 15.454) = 4.460, p = 0.051, with more contribution in each round when participants could gossip ( M = 7.444, SE = 0.357), compared to unable to gossip ( M = 6.378, SE = 0.357).

When the anger modality was the body, the interaction between the emotion compound type and group was marginally significant [ F (2,74) = 3.10, p = 0.051, η 2 = 0.08].

stercorarius was set as the foreground branch, only a single codon in the nad5 gene showed a marginally significant signal ( p = 0.051; Table S6 ).

This effect was also marginally significant in the OCD group compared to controls: increased probabilistic switching ( t (23) = − 2.054, p = 0.051).

Some predictions were also marginally significant, as couples with more children living at home, OR = 3.17, 95% CI [1.00; 10.10], p = 0.051, tended to more often belong to Group 4 than Group 1.

In a Cox proportional regression model, PS, intensity of treatment and p27 retained statistical significance (HR = 2.363, 95% CI = 0.999–5.589, p = 0.050; HR = 2.550, 95% CI = 1.105–5.886, p = 0.028; HR = 3.743, 95% CI =1.064–13.169, p = 0.040, respectively) while cyclin D1 was marginally significant (HR = 1.070, 95% CI = 1.000–1.145, p = 0.051).

Post hoc Tukey tests revealed significant (or marginally significant) differences between no reward and $5 reward ( p = 0.051), between no reward and $10 ( p = 0.020), and between $5 and $10 ( p = 0.008).

A marginally significant difference in pain severity was observed among dysmenorrhea, NMPP, and dyspareunia (mean VAS scores 5.3, 4.7, and 5.4, respectively; p = 0.051), with NMPP being comparatively less severe ( Fig. 1 ).

This association remains marginally significant when adjusting for age, energy intake, BMI, job status, thyroid, and smoking status (OR = 1.08; 95% CI 1.00, 1.16; P = 0.051).

Furthermore, a marginally significant association was also identified between the presence of the chrA gene and MAR index values exceeding 0.2 ( p = 0.051) in our study.