“marginally significant”

Moreover, after applying the modified Bonferroni’s method to adjust possible errors during multiple comparison, the correlations of DMO levels to glucose (adjusted p = 0.047), or DMO C/D ratios to insulin (adjusted p = 0.049) remain significant statistically, but the correlation between levels of DMO and homocysteine became marginally significant (adjusted p = 0.051).

All measures assessing the same ability were significantly positively intercorrelated, except for the linguistic accuracy scores (although the correlation between the verbal fluency and lexical decision task was marginally significant: p = 0.051, r = 0.20), linguistic speed scores (for which the correlation was negative), and the flanker and Simon inhibition scores.

In addition, the main effect of diagnosis was marginally significant ( F (1,31) = 4.11, p = .051, partial η 2 = .117).

The indirect path through P(Cause) was marginally significant, β = 0.036, p = 0.051.

Fecundity and maintenance costs A two‐way ANOVA revealed no effect of salinity on fecundity ( F 2,35 = 2.39, P = 0.11), but a marginally significant effect of selection ( F 3,35 = 2.86, P = 0.051) with the lowest fecundity in heat‐selected lines (Fig. 4 ).

There was marginally significant association between good blood pressure control in patients with hypertension and patients with diabetes and the physical component of the perceived health (p = 0.051).

For root dry biomass, both water availability and rice variety were significant sources of variation, whereas the mycorrhiza × variety interaction was marginally significant ( P = 0.051; Supplementary table 4 ).

RDS at 24 hours and RDS-related mortality were significantly reduced in the lucinactant group, and there was a marginally significant reduction in overall mortality (p = 0.051) in the lucinactant group as well. 34 The only head-to-head comparison of beractant with lucinactant for the prevention of RDS suggests that lucinactant has a slight advantage in clinically important short term outcomes over beractant, including the clinical diagnosis of RDS at 24 hours and RDS-related mortality.

The per day SLT consumption has a marginally significant positive effect (Estimate = 0.232, P = .051), meaning that individuals who consume more SLT daily tend to use it more frequently, although the effect is marginal.

2.0%), which was marginally significant ( p = 0.051).

For similar lures, neither main effect was significant, both F (1, 119) < 1.14, p > .289, but there was a marginally significant interaction, F (1, 119) = 3.88, p = .051.

Channel 4 (Ch4) showed a marginally significant effect [ F (1,11) = 4.066, p = 0.051].

An ANOVA with repeated measures showed a marginally significant group × quadrant interaction overall, F(3, 30)=2.91, p =0.051.

In the LRRC32 MO-injected fish, there was a marginally significant increase in TTA (30% increase, P = .051), whereas TSA was reduced by 29% compared with controls ( P = .034).

Early graduates rated commitment to the profession higher than recent graduates did, while commitment to the organisation was marginally significant for the year of graduation ( p = 0.051).

The two-way interaction of social distance X outcome was marginally significant [ F (2, 117) = 3.05, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.05].

Taken alone, this correlation was marginally significant (P = 0.051), but was non-signficant following Benjamini-Hochberg adjustments for multiple testing (P = 0.322).

When the GA groups (early gestation and late gestation) were included in the model for global rule violations, the main effect for the global rule remained significant (F(1,172.44) = 4.58, p = 0.034) and an additional marginally significant effect for the GA group (F(1,73.39) = 3.92, p = 0.051), but no interaction (F(1,172.44) = 2.25, p = 0.14) was observed.

If we analyzed only participants who learned about a mostly competent vehicle, the Consistency × Impression Type interaction was marginally significant in the predicted direction, b = .27, SE = .14, t (350) = 1.96, p = .051.

Smoking had a marginally significant modification effect on the participants aged 66–69 years with high vitamin C intake ( P = 0.051).

Locality and vegetative period did not affect the average survival probability on the other development stages, although a marginally significant trend of period affecting L3-to-pupae transition was observed ( F 1,3 = 9.84, p = 0.051, Figure 3 ).

The difference in average sensitivity between CRT ( M = 1.45, SD = 1.14) and LCD ( M = 1.76, SD = 1.1) was again small, but we observed a marginally significant main effect of display type, F (1, 23) = 4.24, p = 0.051, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\eta }_{G}^{2}$$\end{document} η G 2 = 0.014, indicating better performance on LCD.

In ANOVA model II, the leisure activity participation rate showed a marginally significant sex × condition interaction ( F 1,71 = 3.95, P = 0.051).

There was marginally significant difference ( p = 0.051) in peak Ca 2+ levels between the control (untreated) and edelfosine-treated groups ( Fig. 6 B).

Gender showed a marginally significant effect ( B = 0.392, p = 0.051 ), while teaching experience ( B = 0.125, p < 0.10 ) and AI usage level ( B = 0.070, p < 0.10 ) also exerted marginally significant influences on voice behavior.