“marginally significant”

Subgroup differences for the effect of SGLT2i on any-cause mortality in participants with HFpEF and HFrEF was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) (Supplemental Figure S18 ).

The interaction effect between eccentricity and visual field was marginally significant, F(2,22) = 3.67, p = .05, indicating that the effect of target eccentricity was slightly larger on movements performed to the right visual field.

However, there was a marginally significant interaction between group and session ( P < 0.05) such that the probiotic group showed improved accuracy in recognising facial expressions following the intervention.

ADC Values and Progression-Free Survival There was a marginally significant association between nADC min and progression free survival (PFS) ( p = 0.05, HR = 0.602, 95%CI = 0.344–1.053).

Self-Directed Learning Ability for Nursing Undergraduates For the average scores of autonomous learning ability among nursing undergraduates, the main effect of time was significant ( F 2,396 =4.28; P =.02), and the main effect of group was marginally significant ( P =.05), whereas the group × time interaction effect was not significant.

Hierarchical logistic regression models, adjusting for significant (age, P < .05) or marginally significant (sex and education, P = .050 and P = .053, respectively) covariates, assessed the biomarkers’ contribution to explain GCF deficit or AUD presence ( supplementary Methods 1.7 ), alongside receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Additionally, we also observed a marginally significant difference between emotional valid cues and neutral valid cues at SOA 450 (t(21) = −1.99, p = .05).

Correlation analysis revealed a marginally significant inverse relationship (r 2 = −0·23, p = 0·05) between change in supine SBP and change in urate from baseline over average of 18 months among the three treatment groups ( Fig. 1 d).

In addition, a marginally significant group by time effect was found for positive adaptation coping, F (1, 46.18) = 3.94, p = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.03–4.65, Hedges’ g = 1.08, with the intervention group reporting improvements in positive adaptation coping from pre- ( M = 24.80, SD = 3.95) to post- ( M = 25.50, SD = 3.18) assessment compared to participants in the waitlist control group (preassessment: M = 23.57, SD = 4.89; post-assessment: M = 21.95, SD = 3.41).

Treatment with a loading dose of 300,000 IU resulted in a minor increase in serum calcium, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

In Table S5 , we also reported the proteins in each complex that are marginally significant (p < 0.05) based on the univariate association test using mixed effects regression models.

There was a marginally significant difference between group means F (1, 32) = 4.05, p = .05, η p 2 = .11, with deaf children performing worse than hearing children.

Egger's test results (Table 4 ) revealed non-significant intercepts ( p > 0.050) for all determinants except performance expectancy, which demonstrated a marginally significant intercept ( p < 0.050). p > 0.050 thresholds indicate low publication bias risk, with the single exception highlighting potential asymmetry for performance expectancy.

Pairwise comparisons using the Mann–Whitney U test revealed marginally significant differences, particularly between the White and Black & Latino groups ( p = 0.05).

The first model found a marginally significant interaction between gentrification and sex ( β = −0.233, p = 0.050), such that there was a negative effect of gentrification on neighborhood cohesion for girls only (see Table 2 ).

Among the methods of intervention, blended interventions combining face-to-face and online approaches showed significant effects (SMD: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.35, P < 0.001), followed by face-to-face interventions, which demonstrated marginally significant effects (SMD: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.34, P = 0.05).

Effects of omega-3 supplementation on blood clotting function and cell blood count (CBC) The lymphocyte count increased in the omega-3 group compared to the control group, though this effect was marginally significant (11.59 vs 11.80, F = 4.08, P = 0.05).

Additionally, vitamin A intake was higher in the TAC2 group and was marginally significant ( P < 0.05).

In addition, trust in people had a marginally significant effect on social empathy ( β = 0.100, p ≤ 0.05), and had a significant effect on subjective well-being ( β = 0.223, p < 0.001).

A marginally significant association (p < 0.05) was observed for A, with one-unit increase in A being associated with a 30.4% reduction in the hazard rate, assuming a Weibull distribution. suggesting that higher A values are also associated with a shorter time to response.

There was a marginally significant valence by group interaction ( F (2,123) = 3.08, p = 0.05).

Here, a marginally significant decrease in TTI ( p < 0.05 ) was observed with biphasic waveforms applied to pigs [ 19 ].

The main effect of object size was marginally significant (F(1,24) = 4.16, p>.05, η p 2 = .15).

In Experiment 1, this correlation was not significant in Phase 1, r = –.36, was marginally significant in Phase 2, r = –.61 p = 0.05, and was significant in Phase 3, r = –.97 p < .003.

Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant but weak positive correlation with age ( r = 0.20, p = 0.03), and a marginally significant correlation with work experience ( r = 0.13, p = 0.05), with the emotional labour score.