“marginally significant”

Subgroup differences for the effect of SGLT2i on any-cause mortality in participants with HFpEF and HFrEF was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) (Supplemental Figure S18 ).

We also found a marginally significant difference in knowledge change across gender identity (H = 6.44, p < 0.05), with respondents who responded with an identity other than male or female (which includes both non-conforming/non-binary and those who preferred not to answer) reporting the greatest change between pre- and post-assessments (mean rank = 182.34).

Association between population growth and lifespan was generally absent (Table 1 and Figure S3 ), apart from a marginally significant positive correlation ( p ‐value = .05), obtained with E . coli IAI1 for population growth at 114 h.

Finally, there was a marginally significant association between overnight sleep duration and attention ( p = 0.05).

The analysis of variances revealed a marginally significant group effect ( F (2, 50) = 3.15, p= .05).

Among females, the model accounted for 7% of the variance in depressive symptoms; however, only screen-based sedentary behavior was the marginally significant predictor (β = 0.14, p = 0.05).

Non–fellowship-trained surgeons demonstrated a marginally significant association with higher risk of aseptic loosening (2.1% vs 0.3% for fellowship-trained, P = .05).

Results are considered significant at p ≤ 0.05 and marginally significant from p > 0.05 to p ≤ 0.10. 3.

Investigation of prioritised AN associated genes We investigated two sets of prioritised genes in silico : (1) conditionally independent associations (TWAS/PWAS/spliceWAS) from marginally significant signals (FDR < 0.05) that are at least nominally jointly significant ( p < 0.05), and (2) genes in the finemapped 90% credible set with PIP > 0.4 and the absence of the null model in the credible set.

Oral contraceptives Of 11 IBWIL studies assessing oral contraceptives [ 21 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 38 , 39 , 42 , 51 – 53 , 55 , 56 , 58 ], one reported a marginally significant increase in risk (adjHR: 1.46, P = 0.05); 10 reported nonsignificant estimates ranging from adjusted incidence rate ratios (adjIRR) 0.66 to adjHR 1.80 (Fig. 2 ).

The results showed that only feedback type was marginally significant for the main effects, F (1,44) = 4.057, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.084.

A marginally significant effect on tonal target was also found [ F (1, 83) = 3,964, p < 0.05].

Thus, we believe that only a minor fraction of the observed improvement (with low marginally significant correlation, r = 0.18, p = 0.05, Fig. 4c ) may be attributed to the additional sessions performed by those with the worse VA.

In the Cox regression analysis, the occurrence of metastasis had a marginally significant association with tumor thickness (B = 0.227, 95-CI: 0.111 to 0.343, p -value = 0.050), and there was no significant association between recurrence of the tumor ( p -value = 0.662) or TNM staging ( p -value = 0.32) and the incidence of metastasis.

A significant or marginally significant interaction between task and background color was found for NA score [ F (1,38) = 4.25, p < 0.05, η p 2 = 0.10] and TDR [ F (1,36) = 3.03, p = 0.09, η p 2 = 0.08], indicating that the effect of background color depends on the task.

Without the presence of an alpha value, the P value can be interpreted as P > 0.10, not significant; P ≤ 0.10, marginally significant; P ≤ 0.05, significant; and P ≤ 0.01, highly significant.

The model showed a marginally significant and positive relationship between continuation and PTSD symptoms in W3 ( β = 0.08, p = 0.05), but not with PTSD symptoms in W4.

A marginally significant association was observed between nicotine use and child ACEs (F = 3.39, p = .05), There was no significant association observed between nicotine use and or F 2 -IsoPs (F = 2.21, p = .14).

For A allele of SLCO2B1 rs1789693, HR = 1.17 per risk allele ( p = 0.10), including a marginally significant association in White men (HR = 1.23, p = 0.05).

HOMA-IR values were marginally significant among the groups ( P = 0.05).

lavandulaefolia (marginally significant) ( P < 0.05; Figure 7 ).

Ratings were higher for frequencies 14 and 16 kHz for the NH subgroup ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for the 12.5 kHz ( p = 0.05).

However, we observed a marginally significant difference between leaf surfaces (χ 2 = 3.82, df = 1, P = 0.05).

We observed a weak and marginally significant correlation ( r = 0.16, R a d j 2 = 0 . 02 , t = 1.97, p = .05), which was driven by the shape word condition ( r = 0.24, R a d j 2 = 0 . 05 , t = 2.11, p < .05).

A meta-analysis ( Clark et al , 2005 ) showed a significant reduction in the length of hospitalisation (hazard ratio: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49–0.82, P =0.0006) with the use of G-CSF, but only a marginally significant decrease in infection-related mortality (odds ratio: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.26–1.00, P =0.05) and no significant reduction in overall mortality.