All correlations between the TPB variables and added constructs are significant at p < 0.001 ( Table 3 ), with the only exception being the correlation between attitude and past behaviour in Italy, which is marginally significant ( p = 0.050).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The intervention period of less than 6 weeks improved the response time to a certain extent, showing a marginally significant effect (SMD = −0.68, p = 0.05), while the intervention period exceeding 6 weeks did not make the response time reach statistical significance (SMD = −1.03, p > 0.07).
A marginally significant positive association ( P = .05) was also observed between CRHR2 expression and normal weight patients as compared with the overweight patients.
HOMA-IR values were marginally significant among the groups ( P = 0.05).
The main effects of school-based involvement ( β = 0.13, p < 0.001) and parent-teacher relationship ( β = 0.26, p < 0.001) were both significant, while their interaction term was marginally significant ( β = 0.12, p = 0.05).
Among teenage mothers, the odds of institutional delivery was higher at the marginally significant level (p = 0.05) among the middle [AOR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.00 3.02] and rich [AOR: 13.70; 95% CI: 1.89 59.09] economic groups.
A marginally significant association was found in retrospective cohorts (OR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.00–3.17, P = 0.05, I 2 = 91%), whereas no significant associations were identified in women aged >32 years (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 0.89–4.83, P = 0.09, I 2 = 99%) or small-sample studies (<1,000 participants, OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 0.54–5.22, P = 0.37, I 2 = 69%).
We found that AC016876.1 showed marginally significant lower expression in Basal-like than Her2 patients with uninvolved lymph node (stage ;N0; P=0.05; Wilcoxon test; Figure S1H ).
We did observe a marginally significant interaction between soil type and sterilization method ( F 1,30 = 2, R 2 = 0.04, P = 0.05), and a three-way interaction between soil type, sterilization method, and wash treatment ( F 1,30 = 2, R 2 = 0.04, P = 0.05), but they only explained a minor part of the composition variance ( R 2 = 0.04).
Hierarchical logistic regression models, adjusting for significant (age, P < .05) or marginally significant (sex and education, P = .050 and P = .053, respectively) covariates, assessed the biomarkers’ contribution to explain GCF deficit or AUD presence ( supplementary Methods 1.7 ), alongside receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
However, they did show a marginally significant (ρ = -0.091; p = 0.05) negative correlation between reflectance and altitude.
A further simple-slope analysis revealed that, for the low-involvement group, the positive predictive effect of exposure to vulnerable physician portrayals on overall evaluations was marginally significant (simple slope=0.10; SE 0.05; P =.05) and the evaluations mediated the relationship between exposure to vulnerable physician portrayals and trust in physicians; the indirect effect was 0.08 (95% CI 0.002-0.17).
When all etiologies were pooled, the mean difference of 0.14 in scores between F2-4 and F1-0 fibrosis for AST/ALT was marginally significant (p=0.05).
There was a marginally significant difference in EQ-5D composite scores between elderly ICU survivors and age-matched community controls, with a small effect size (d=−0.22, p=0.05).
The combination (interaction) of the two, with marginally significant effect on the outcome (p = 0.05), influenced the conclusions sufficiently to be included in the final model.
However, left-sided location and AB of SRH were more common in the rebleeding group than in the non-rebleeding group, and these differences were considered marginally significant ( P = 0.05 and P = 0.08, respectively).
CYP2C9 1075 A>C (*3 variant) polymorphism showed a marginally significant difference between patients having multiple drug resistance and drug-responsive patients for AC genotype (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.32–1.00, P = 0.05).
A similar trend was observed for the Tinetti test, with marginally significant increases between T0 and T5 [ t (30) = 2.129; p < 0.05; d = 0.376] and between T0 and T17 [ t (30) = 2.037; p < 0.05; d = 0.438], which were no longer significant after the Bonferroni adjustment; again no difference was observed between T5 and T17.
Our findings indicated a marginally significant negative association (β = −0.18, p = 0.05) between the omnibus WQS stress-connectivity index and gestational age at delivery.
Long-term interventions [ 22 , 23 , 33 ] (D > 12 weeks; 3 studies) exhibited marginally significant effects (SMD = − 0.81, 95% CI − 1.62 – 0.00; p = 0.05) with considerable heterogeneity (I2= 90%).
This decline was statistically significant ( p < 0.05) in 9/10 of the villages with the highest prevalence in 2011 and was marginally significant ( p = 0.05) in the remaining high prevalence village (Table 1 ).
However, when both PAD and NT-proBNP were considered as a categorical variable, NT-proBNP was not significantly associated with HFH (HR: 1.55, p = 0.242) while PAD was marginally significant (HR: 3.2, p = 0.05).
In addition, there were main effects of Source ( F 1,38 = 5.33, p = 0.03; indicating higher accuracy for self than other conditions) and Distortion ( F 1,38 = 54.82, p < 0.001; indicating higher accuracy for undistorted than distorted conditions), and a marginally significant Diagnosis × Source × Distortion interaction ( F 1,38 = 4.08, p = 0.05).
The interaction of the BCKA/BCAA ratio with sex was marginally significant ( P = 0.05); sex-stratified analysis then revealed that BCKA/BCAA was associated with steatosis grade in female participants (OR [95% CI], 1.7 [1.2–2.3], P = 0.002), but the association was completely absent in the male cohort (OR [95% CI], 1.0 [0.7–1.5], P = 0.9) ( Supplemental Figure 1 ).
There was no evidence that mosquito net use the night before the survey related to MHS from 2011–2012 and marginally significant evidence (p<0.05) from 2015–2016 (β = 1.466, 95% C.I. = 0.848–2.103, marginal R 2 = 0.020, respectively).