“marginally significant”

In the path model, “Active coping” and “Avoidance coping” had significant or marginally significant associations with “exercise habits” (active: β = 0.19, p = 0.008, avoidance: β = −0.12, p = 0.088), and psychological distress (active: β = −0.25, p < 0.001, avoidance: β = 0.363, p < 0.001).

Furthermore, an overall analysis indicated a marginally significant association between the A1298C polymorphism and MI risk in the recessive model (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI = 1.06–1.51, P = 0.008), allelic model (OR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 1.01–1.39, P = 0.03), and CC vs .

The presence of genes that cause autosomal recessive diseases in three of the seven marginally significant regions―a highly unlikely observation ( P < 0.008 across 1000 random draws of genomic regions of equivalent size)―suggests the intriguing possibility that, if these clusters do indeed represent distinct endogamic communities, they may be the hallmark of cultural and natural selection processes related to the differential presence of deleterious genetic variants in these genes.

These lncRNA and neighboring protein-coding gene pairs showed marginally significant greater correlated expression compared to randomized gene pairs using single-cell expression ( P -value = 0.008) but not when using single-nucleus expression ( P -value = 0.063).

At follow-up, the Baduanjin exercise group showed a marginally significant improvement in FTSST ( P = 0.008) and TUGT ( P = 0.040) over the 12 weeks compared to the control group.

7D , the degree of reward and threat representations in these networks during approach and avoid trials reflect significant or marginally significant deviations from non-conflict trials for both networks (salience network: approach trials vs low conflict trial t (52) = 2.76, p = .008; avoid trials vs low conflict trials t (52) = −2.86, p = .006; right inferior frontal network: approach trials vs low conflict t (52) = −2.71, p = .009; avoid trials vs low conflict trials t (52) = 1.83, p = .07). 4.

Comparison Between T0 and T1 in the Group of Participants with Unilateral Brain Damage and in the Group of Healthy Controls Conducted in order to compare performance at T0 and T1 in the group of participants with unilateral brain damage, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a marginally significant improvement at T1 in the wFBET (Z = −2.37, p = 0.009, FDR-adj p = 0.051, one-tailed) and in the BI (Z = −2.12, p = 0.017, FDR-adj p = 0.051, one-tailed) when controlling the FDR at 0.05 using the Benjamini–Hochberg method.

Post-hoc Wilcoxon signed-rank tests using a Bonferroni corrected alpha of 0.008 revealed a significant difference between children’s spontaneity in the object-centred helping and social-centred comforting tasks ( z = −2.74, p = 0.006) and a marginally significant difference between the social-centred helping and social-centred comforting tasks ( z = −2.60, p = 0.009).

The most significant discrimination is that between P2a and R2a; marginally significant (p<0.009 uncorrected) were discriminations between P2a and P2b or Ss.

Among NHB participants, the interaction remained significant for episodic memory ( β = −0.092, 95% CI = [−0.142, −0.041], p < 0.001, p _FDR = 0.005) and marginally significant for executive function ( β = −0.073, 95% CI = [−0.129, −0.018], p = 0.009, p _FDR = 0.056).

A marginally significant relationship between prenatal PSS and BA estimates in early pregnancy was identified ( p = 0.009 ) in the full sample.

Coping strategies In the coping model, all but two of the coping strategies (approach and substance abuse) made an independently significantly contribution to the model, controlling for baseline stress, that is, avoidance, χ 2 = 74.54, p < .001, acceptance, χ 2 = 39.76, p < .001, close support, χ 2 = 26.18, p < .001, distant support, χ 2 = 50.30, p < .001, and self-blame χ 2 = 86.11, p < .001, although the approach strategy was marginally significant according to our criteria, χ 2 = 13.52, p = .009.

This analysis revealed significant or marginally significant effects of strategy in the left IOG (F [1, 12] = 9.8, p = 0.009) and SPL (F [1, 12] = 5.1, p = 0.05), whereas the same effect did not reach significance either in the left PMd (F [1, 12] = 0.3 p = 0.6) or in the IFG (F [1, 12] = 1.0 p = 0.3).

On the other hand, we found significantly negative correlation between cortical activity and job demand at ch16 (FDR corrected P < 0.00096; r = −0.412), and marginally significant correlations at ch26 (uncorrected P = 0.009; r = −0.316) and ch27 (uncorrected P = 0.012; r = −0.311).

Also, the effect of perceived tailoring on intentions reported as the main analysis (i.e., controlling for gender, race, political orientation, and experimental conditions; and including tailoring and injunctive norms in the same model) becomes marginally significant at p = .009 according to this new cutoff.

Treating TOI as a categorical variable, we found a marginally significant effect of TOI category on whether participants believed practicing skills changes a person’s brain [ F (2,190) = 4.79, p = 0.009, η 2 = 0.038] Tukey contrasts revealed a significant difference only between the incremental and the entity theorists [ t (112) = 2.77, p = 0.02].

Localization of HORMADs in pachytene spermatocytes Median HORMAD1/2 signal intensities on synapsed axes decrease slightly as cells progress from zygotene to pachytene ( Figures 5A, 5B ; Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.08 (marginally significant) for HORMAD1 and p<0.0096 for HORMAD2), while the intensity of SYCP1 signal increases during this time ( Figures 5A, 5B ; p<0.0001).

Furthermore, the result of Egger’s test also revealed a marginally significant publication bias (p < 0.01) (Table 4 ).

The increase in use of drawings was marginally significant, with use changing from five students to 17 ( p = 0.010).

In the United States, Gunn and Lester [ 18 ] reported marginally significant positive associations between suicide rates and search volumes for the terms “commit suicide” ( p = 0.01) and “how to suicide” ( p = 0.07).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P ≤.05 (marginally significant at P ≤.1, highly significant at P ≤.01, and extremely significant at P <.001). 18 In addition, a post hoc power analysis was carried out to examine the power of the bond strength data using G*Power 3.1.7 software.

For the Average duration of whole fixations ( Table 7 ), the main effect of expertise level was not significant (B = 0.03, p = 0.59), while the main effect of content type was marginally significant (B = -0.11, p = 0.01).

Vitamin A was associated with a marginally significant reduction of 2.39 days (p = 0.01, 95% CI: 4.19-0.47), while zinc supplementation yielded a more pronounced effect, averaging a 3.17-day reduction (p < 0.01, 95% CI: 5.19-1.31).

Despite the association between loneliness and interpersonal distance preference within intimate space being marginally significant in the presence of putative mediators, the overall loneliness*personal space interaction remained significant (Likelihood-ratio drop-test: χ 2 (2) = 9.21, p = .01).

Although there was a marginally significant difference in the odds of having mild DTM compared to absent DTM ( p = 0.01), none of the AUDIT categories demonstrated a statistically significant effect on DTM severity.