marginally non-significantp = 0.0673
The effect of larval body mass had a marginally non-significant influence on CTmax (F 1,76 = 3.45, p = 0.0673).
The effect of larval body mass had a marginally non-significant influence on CTmax (F 1,76 = 3.45, p = 0.0673).
Post-intervention, the RODL group exhibited a significantly higher dry fecal fat concentration (58.48 ± 29.95 mg/g) than the placebo group (39.54 ± 21.39 mg/g; P = 0.0025, Wilcoxon), although the within-group change in the RODL group was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.0675; Fig. 4E ).
In patients with significant TR, the correlation tended to be slightly stronger, although still moderate (rho = 0.54), but was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.0676).
However, the estimated slope coefficient of the meta regression in humans was 0.0128 (SE = 0.0066), showing a positive but marginally non-significant increase (t = 1.9332, p = 0.0677) (Fig. 6 b).
3.2 Channels of interest One-way MANOVA for absolute theta power at rest with subject group (apathetic PD, non-apathetic PD, and healthy control subjects) as the independent variable and each of the nine channels (Cz, C4, CP5, CP1, CPz, CP2, CP6, Pz, and P4) as a dependent variable showed a marginally non-significant difference between subject groups ( F (2,34) = 1.70, p = .068; Pillai's Trace = 0.724, partial η 2 = 0.362).
Total change fatigue score The analysis revealed a marginally non-significant negative association between change fatigue and innovative behavior (β′ = -0.071, p = 0.068), though the negative trend aligned with theoretical expectations (β = -0.060, 95% CI: -0.125 to 0.004).
Stimulation of rFEF with an ipsilateral reference electrode The ANOVA with the factors of Session (1, 2) and Block (1–5) revealed a marginally non-significant main effect of Session ( p = 0.068, with search times slower in Session 1: M = 870.21, SE = 96.7; compared to the Session 2: M = 804.34, SE = 74.3).
There was significant variation among males in intercepts for LIN ( G 2 1 = 4.457, P = 0.035) and marginally non-significant variation among males in slopes of LIN over time ( G 2 3 = 7.119, P = 0.068).
This model explain 19.20% of the variance (adjusted R 2 : 0.192) For HF (n.u.), infection duration was a significant predictor in both models ( p = 0.002), whereas age was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.068 in Model 1; p = 0.055 in Model 2).
Normal fertilization rates were higher in the diclofenac sodium group (82.1% vs 66.8%) but marginally non-significant after adjustment (adjusted OR 2.12, P=0.068).
This was evident as a significant effect of male genotype (GLIM dispersion parameter = 7.46, G 2 1 = 216.3 F = 28.88, p < 0.0001) and a marginally non-significant interaction between female age and male genotype ( G 2 12 = 150.9, F = 1.69, p = 0.068).
According to the Tukey post-hoc test applied on the marginally non-significant Sex × Treatment interaction ( F 2,122 = 2.786; P = 0.068), males exposed to toad scent had greater latency to unroll than males exposed to rabbit scent and to water, and than females exposed to water, with every other pairwise comparison being non-significant ( Table 1 ; Fig. 1 ).
We found no support for an association between Campylobacter prevalence and sampling date in adults ( W = 0.11, df = 1, P = 0.74), but in nestlings, this relationship was only marginally non-significant ( W = 3.32, df = 1, P = 0.068), indicating a trend for a decreasing prevalence with date (β = -0.059 ± 0.029).
Although BMI was marginally non-significant in the cohort ( P = 0.068), its relationship with the ABCG2 variant is highly relevant.
A marginally non-significant difference was found when comparing rapidly developing crickets with slowly developing crickets (5.1 ± 0.94, mean ± SD; Tukey’s test, P = 0.068).
For patients with a final diagnosis of stroke who had been dispatched as stroke there was a marginally non-significant 2.8 minutes (95% CI −0.2 to 5.9 minutes, p=0.068) reduction between Pre- and Post-implementation periods from call to arrival of the ambulance at scene.
Regarding retinal hemodynamic parameters, no statistically significant differences were detected between active and inactive patients in arterial and venous blood flow velocity (BFVA and BFVV), arterial and venous retinal blood flow (RBFA and RBFV), or arterial and venous vessel diameter (DA and DV, all p > 0.05), although retinal venous blood flow (RBFV) showed a marginally non-significant trend toward higher values in the active group (β = 6.09, 95% CI: −0.47 to 12.65, p = 0.068).
= 0.29, P = 0.0193) and larger (marginally non-significant effect, LRR = 1.0, s.e. = 0.55, P = 0.068).
Moreover, the TST demonstrated a marginally non-significant reduction in struggling time in 12-week HFrD-fed mice ( p = 0.0684), potentially indicating the onset of behavioral despair (Fig. 2 B-D).
camara canopy cover and incidences of soil erosion was marginally non-significant ( r = 0.276, p = 0.069; Table 3 ).
Urbanization score was marginally non-significant ( P = 0.069), when used instead of population density in the model (Table S1 in Electronic Supplementary Material).
Similarly, for CFDDS, the highest NPS group showed significantly increased odds in the crude model (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.35–3.95, p = 0.003) and Model 1 (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.10–3.38, p = 0.024), although the association became marginally non-significant in the fully adjusted model (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.95–3.34, p = 0.069).
Winsorizing the data did not qualitatively alter the results (in the winsorized analysis, mating status had a significant effect on fighting duration (Dev 1, 127 = 13.413, P < 0.001), egg production capability was marginally non-significant (Dev 1, 126 = 1.364, P = 0.069), and there was no interaction between egg production capability and mating status (Dev 1, 125 = 0.124, P = 0.583).
However, the difference between bare and debris was only significant for partially cloaked species ( Table 3 ), and the difference between bark and debris was marginally non-significant (z = −2.274, p = 0.069) ( Table 2 ).
However, this association became marginally non-significant after full covariates adjustment (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.57-1.02; P = 0.069).