marginally non-significantP = 0.069
However, this association became marginally non-significant after full covariates adjustment (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.57-1.02; P = 0.069).
However, this association became marginally non-significant after full covariates adjustment (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.57-1.02; P = 0.069).
Winsorizing the data did not qualitatively alter the results (in the winsorized analysis, mating status had a significant effect on fighting duration (Dev 1, 127 = 13.413, P < 0.001), egg production capability was marginally non-significant (Dev 1, 126 = 1.364, P = 0.069), and there was no interaction between egg production capability and mating status (Dev 1, 125 = 0.124, P = 0.583).
Additionally, the high-anxiety group showed trends toward higher processed food consumption and poorer sleep quality and duration, though these differences were marginally non-significant ( p = 0.069 and p = 0.080, respectively).
This marginally non-significant finding ( p = 0.069) High neuroticism was observed in 56.9% of hostel residents and 62.7% of day scholars, demonstrating that personality trait expression is stable across living contexts and is not substantially influenced by residential arrangement.
4 ), but the singular effect of plasma osmolality was not ( F 1,110 = 1.3, P = 0.2), and their interaction effect was marginally non-significant ( F 2,110 = 2.8, P = 0.07).
The frequency of crossings between the bright and the dark compartments showed a marginally non-significant effect of the ethanol factor [ F (1, 57) = 3.28, p = 0.07], a significant effect of the acetate treatment [ F (2, 57) = 3.53, p < 0.05], but no significant interaction [F (2, 57) = 0.52, n.s.].
Nonparametric bivariate correlations analyses suggested that the observed relationships were significant for the 6-month group, (r(1, 17) = .66, p = .004), marginally non-significant for the 12-month group (r(1, 16) = .47, p = .07) and not significant for the adult group r(1, 15) = .19, p =.50).
Although the interaction between these factors was marginally non-significant (Wald = 3.29, p = 0.07), pairwise comparisons indicate that the benefit of immunization was restricted to ants introduced immediately after treatment with Metarhizium ( figure 2 ).
However, the main effect of objective vulnerability was marginally non-significant, F (1, 723) = 3.30, p = .07, η p 2 = 0.005.
Walking or bicycling also showed a significant reduction in ED risk in Model 1 (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.82, P = 0.001) and Model 2 (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.56-0.94, P = 0.02), but the association was marginally non-significant in Model 3 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.61-1.02, P = 0.07).
Including sample size (square-root transformed) in the model as an additional moderator, the overall moderating effect of measurement technique became marginally non-significant ( Q 3 = 7.10, p = 0.07).
Median AAR was greater in SC compared to SN, but the differences were marginally non-significant (p = 0.07, Figure 1 A).
Results Male scorpions tended to have longer bodies than females, but the difference was marginally non-significant (t 53.80 = 1.86, p = 0.07; Fig. 2A ).
There was also a marginally non-significant increase in the expression of wnt3 in Vv both in Mirror fighters ( z = 1.78, p = 0.07, d s = 0.43) and in Losers ( z = 2.16, p = 0.03, d s = 0.43, Figure 2E ) when compared to the control group.
Significant reductions in FM were exclusively observed in the young (MD = −1.09 kg, p < 0.001) and older (MD = −1.49 kg, p < 0.001) cohorts, whereas the reduction in early middle-aged adults was marginally non-significant (MD = −1.22 kg, 95% CI [−2.55, 0.10], p = 0.070).
5 ), though it was marginally non-significant in the Hahn background ( P = 0.07).
A positive but marginally non-significant effect of longitude (F = 7.14, df = 1, P = 0.07, N StMalo = 114, N Molloy = 152, N AnsePapous = 219) highlighted possible inter-site differences, with an eastward increase in body sizes of individuals (St.
In addition, paired t -test for equality between AD 1 and F 1 values confirm that the differences in means between AD 1 and F 1 are significantly different for D-biased genes (AD 1 mean = -0.45 and F 1 mean = -0.36; p -value = 6.63 × 10 -5 ), and marginally non-significant for A-biased genes (AD 1 mean = 0.46 and F 1 mean = 0.37; p -value = 0.07).
Marginally non-significant associations were observed between Il1b and expression of Ifng ( p = 0.070) and Tgfb1 ( p = 0.056) under additive models, where for both genes the Il1b GGT haplotype was associated with decreased mRNA transcription.
In the absence of the insecticide, the effect of the kdr genotype on the mosquito mortality was marginally non-significant (SS = 0.09 ± 0.33, RS = 0.01 ± 0.24, RR = 0.08 ± 0.13, LRT X 2 2 = 5.33; P = 0.07, Fig. 3 a), and there was no significant interaction between kdr genotype and plant diet (Fig. 3 a, LRT X 2 6 = 2.54; P = 0.86).
We initially found no significant QTL for scleral ossification when treated as a continuous trait, although we did find two marginally non-significant QTL at the significance threshold P < 0.07 ( Fig 4A ).
4 ) and marginally non-significant in moss ( F 24 = 2.994, p = 0.07, Fig. 4 ).
This difference was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.070), but the trend is consistent with previous research documenting significant but otherwise similar patterns. 25 Queen banking for 18 days did not affect acceptance rates or retinue pheromone profiles, but pheromones, metabolites, and lipids profoundly varied by age.
The correlation coefficient rose from −0.04 to 0.36, consistent with there being a relation between NCI RAW and consonance preference, although the correlation was marginally non-significant ( r s(16) =0.36, p =0.07).
There was also a marginally non-significant, negative additive genetic covariance between ELF and the slope term for offspring birth weight ( Χ 1 2 =3.54; p =0.07; table 1 a ).