“marginal significance”

For the remainder of candidate genes studied in European Caucasian subjects, we only observed significant association for ARRB2 with low maximum pain phenotype (P=0.026) and marginal significance of OPRM1 (P=0.079) and COMT (P=0.057) with total morphine sulfate dose.

This difference was somewhat smaller in magnitude and reached marginal significance (OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.18, 1.10], p = 0.079).

The compatibility effect in RT was larger with marginal significance when the preceding trial type was incompatible compared to compatible, t (19) = 1.860, p = 0.079, d = 0.299 ( Figure 3A ).

The analysis on valence found significant main effect for the sound stimuli ( F (1,16) = 16.812, P = 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.512) and marginal significance for background music ( F (2,32) = 2.744, P = 0.079, partial η 2 = 0.146), although the interaction between them was not significant ( F (2,32) = 0.232, P = 0.794, partial η 2 = 0.014).

For the classification of the infarction extent of ischemic core ≥ 70 ml, the wHU-ASPECTS on NCCT showed the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.891 ( P < 0.001; sensitivity 93.75%, specificity 81.58%), higher than automated NCCT-ASPECTS (AUC = 0.817, P < 0.001; sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 84.21%), with a marginal significance according to DeLong’s test analysis ( P = 0.079); the wHU-ASPECTS based on CTA source images showed the AUC of 0.867 ( P < 0.001; sensitivity 72.22%, specificity 87.8%), higher than automated CTA-ASPECTS (AUC = 0.799, P < 0.001; sensitivity 66.67%, specificity 95.12%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance according to DeLong’s test analysis ( P = 0.373) ( Table 3 and Figure 4 ).

The 7-day compressive strength model shows marginal significance ( P = 0.079), suggesting a comparatively weaker influence of the selected factors at early ages.

When we entered the burnout-depression interaction term into the fully adjusted model, the exhaustion * depression interaction was associated with suicidal ideation with marginal significance (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.96–1.95, p = 0.079) but the cynicism * depression interaction was not (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.90–1.81, p = 0.168).

In partial tumor removal or biopsy cases, out-of-field recurrence was less frequent in the IMRT (16.2%) than in the 3D-CRT (36.3%) group, with marginal significance (p = 0.079).

While Shannon and Faith's PD indices did not differ significantly among groups (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.670 and p = 0.177, respectively), Observed richness was higher in the less restrictive site (CA), particularly among asymptomatic trees, with marginal significance (Kruskal–Wallis χ 2 = 5.07, df = 2, p = 0.079).

A significant positive correlation was found with APP expression (p = 0.004) and a marginal significance for Ki67 (p = 0.079) ( Table 1 ).

Although patients showed larger switch cost (31.7 ms) than HCs (15.5 ms) in reaction time, the interaction effect just reached marginal significance (F(1, 50) = 3.209, p = 0.079, η p 2 = 0.060).

pPFS showed marginal significance between the two groups (log-rank p = 0.079, Supplemental Figure S2A ), with median pPFS of 6.1 and 4.7 months, respectively.

The IEs for F tended to be larger than the IEs for H, but with just marginal significance for young adults ( p = 0.079) and failing statistical significance ( p = 0.323) for middle-age adults.

Although there was a marginal significance ( p = 0.080), visitation by grandparents, other relatives, and friends was inversely associated with the DSRSC score (coefficient = − 1.60, 95% CI = − 3.4, 0.19, Model 4).

For the left pIPS, using top 200 voxels yielded marginal significance in decoding performance ( P = 0.08), and using top 100 voxels generated significant performance ( P = 0.02, SI Appendix , Fig.

Risk Score 2, consisting solely of preoperatively available variables, also demonstrated marginal significance ( p = 0.08).

Residence area showed a marginal significance before we corrected for creatinine levels ( p = 0.08) (Table 2 ), but this trend disappeared after the correction ( p = 0.12) (Table 3 ).

3 C, P = 0.002); there was a similar trend with marginal significance for TFPI (Fig. 3 G; P = 0.08).

Both smoking and alcohol consumption elevated the risk of ESCC, but only smoking showed a marginal significance ( p = 0.08).

Specifically, inflammatory and infectious disease datasets were overrepresented in the cluster with marginal significance (Odds Ratio = 4.1, Fisher’s exact test p = 0.08).

Paradoxically however, in Kaplan–Meier estimates, up-regulation of miR-205 expression was associated with a worse prognostic outcome, but this trend only reached marginal significance for CSM and CF (middle plots, Figure 4A–C , CSM, p = 0.08; CF, p = 0.09; BCR, p = 0.12). 2.5.

The path of “service quality” to “user satisfaction” showed marginal significance ( P =.08) under the 92% CI.

Quadrats with geckos ( N = 29) had a higher number of high-quality rocks than those without geckos ( N = 11) with marginal significance (Mann–Whitney U test, Z = 1.73, p = 0.08; N = 40).

Relative risk for malignancy was 3.5 times higher in nodules with microcalcifications and showed marginal significance (8.6% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.08, OR = 3.5, p = 0.07).

Secondhand smoke exposure showed marginal significance with increased neighborhood traffic ( p = 0.08), and children with any household pet (dog and/or cat) were less likely to be exposed to neighborhood traffic ( p = 0.02) but after adjusting for demographics and family history of asthma this was no longer statistically significant.