The interaction between executive function and age of diagnosis showed a marginal significance ( β = 0.25, p = 0.077), but did not significantly improve explained variance (Δ R 2 = 0.025).
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
EGC was negatively associated with snoring in the univariate analysis but only showed marginal significance in the multivariate analysis (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.10; p = 0.077).
The Child Pugh score was not statistically different between the RT and non-RT groups, although there was marginal significance ( P = 0.077).
When applying the Hodges formula, maximal change in QTc interval was higher in the ramosetron group with a marginal significance (mean difference 8.81 ms, 95 % CI −0.99–18.61, P = 0.077).
The mean values of RFS were 21 and 14 months in ascites cholesterol levels < 70 mg/dL and ≥ 70 mg/dL groups, showing marginal significance ( p = 0.077) (Fig. 7 ).
Erlotinib treatment of PCLS from CDAHFD-induced mouse cirrhotic livers for 72 hours significantly suppressed the expression of the profibrogenic genes Il6 , Col1a1 , and Timp1 (Figures 2 A, B) and suppressed Acta2 (also named αSMA ) expression with marginal significance ( p = 0.0777).
For the globus pallidus, the left-side volume was larger in the SPE(+) group than in the SPE(−) group at a marginal significance level ( p = 0.078–0.080, Models 2–4), although there was no significant group difference in the right-side volume.
Although no significance was found, the difference in overall survival reached marginal significance ( P =0.078).
The patients also demonstrated significant differences in total IgE levels as compared to the controls (Table 1 ). Serum leptin and leptin receptor levels in atopic asthma We observed that serum leptin level was higher in asthmatic patients during exacerbation (13.81 ± 10.56 ng/mL) than in the control subjects (6.32 ± 5.20 ng/mL), but this difference showed marginal significance ( P = 0.078) (Fig. 1 a).
Mechanical valves were used in approximately 27% to 33% of cases, and the proportion of mechanical valve use showed a tendency to decrease, with marginal significance overall (p=0.078) and significant decreases in patients less than 60 years of age and in men (p=0.013 and p=0.023, respectively).
Chi-square test showed that tumors originating from a major nerve significantly correlated with a postoperative neurological deficit (p = 0.033) and logistic analysis showed that those showed marginal significance to produce it (p = 0.078) (Table 1 e).
The details are as follows: Among the 26 efficacy indicators, 10 showed statistically significant differences ( P ≤ .078), of which 8 were significantly different ( P ≤ .019) and 2 showed marginal significance ( P = .078, 0.093).
The number of positive margins was similar between FSD and PSD, but the number of negative margins increased and that of borderline decreased in PSD with marginal significance ( P = 0.078) (Table 2 ) (Figure 2A and B).
The same cutoff value could discriminate those with early systemic metastasis from those without with marginal significance in patients with resected pT3 pancreatic cancer (p=0.078).
Surgery with CTx and CRT showed association with superior OS (p < 0.05), and surgery with RT had marginal significance (p=0.078).
A simple-effect analysis revealed that: (1) when no noise was present, the AULCSF was largest in TE, followed by GE and BE (all, p < 0.05); (2) when low noise was present, the AULCSF was also largest in TE, followed by GE and in BE (all, p < 0.05); (3) when high noise was present, only the difference in the AULCSF between TE and BE reached marginal significance ( p = 0.078).
Although there was substantial neurite outgrowth following preincubation with all percentages of horse serum (including 0%), there was more variability when using lower percentages (i.e., 0, 2.5 and 5%), and while the higher percentages (i.e., 10 and 15%) did seem to foster slightly more neurite outgrowth, there was at best marginal significance, with the comparison of 5 versus 10% horse serum preincubation coming the closest to achieving statistical significance (p = 0.078).
A marginal significance was found for relapse (p = 0.078) and metastasis site (p = 0.061) with phosphorylated protein expression in LMS samples ( Table 2 ).
By contrast, upon awakening, the relative delta power increased with marginal significance in O2 ( χ 2 = 9.1, with post hoc FDR-corrected p = 0.078 for Pre–A3, A1–A2 and A2–A3), and FC5 ( χ 2 = 8.3, with post hoc tests of p > 0.195, FDR-corrected), indicating the extended sleepiness even after awakening.
Low testosterone was associated with poor survival with marginal significance (log-rank test, p = .079).
Patients who received HDCT/ASCR had a higher risk for thyroid dysfunction with marginal significance ( P =0.079) ( Table 2 ). 3.
Moreover, multivariable analysis of MSI colorectal cancers demonstrated that GALNT7 had significant prognostic value in the AC-ICAM MSI (HR = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.03–0.84; P = 0.047) and GSE39582 MSI (HR = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.52; P = 0.027) cohorts, independent of other clinical covariates, whereas it showed marginal significance in TCGA MSI cohort (HR = 0.24; 95% CI, 0.04–1.01; P = 0.079; Supplementary Table S4).
Among the known chemokines, CCL5 (CC chemokine ligand 5, also known as RANTES), showed elevated mRNA levels in metastatic relative to localized tumors with marginal significance (log 2 fold change [FC] = 2.69, adjusted P = 0.079) ( Supplemental Figure 1 ).
Another study hinted at a potential benefit of CH on ICI treatment outcomes, as measured by PFS, but the sample size was small (n=115 ICI+chemotherapy-treated) and the association signal was of only marginal significance (p=0.079). 24 Comparisons between this study and ours are further complicated by differing cancer types (pancreatic vs NSCLC in our study) and ICI treatment drugs (anti-CTLA4 vs anti-PD-L1 in our study).
In the healthy controls, the inferior cpRNFL (130.07 ± 11.6 μ m) tended to be thicker than the superior cpRNFL (126.96 ± 14.6 μ m), but with marginal significance ( P = 0.079; Figure 2(a) ), whereas the superior GCIPL (86.71 ± 4.53 μ m) was significantly thicker than the inferior GCIPL (85.25 ± 4.40 μ m; P < 0.001; Figure 2(b) ).