“marginal significance”

Among the control variables, professional title ( B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p < 0.05) was positively related to communication efficacy, and age showed marginal significance ( B = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.08).

Secondhand smoke exposure showed marginal significance with increased neighborhood traffic ( p = 0.08), and children with any household pet (dog and/or cat) were less likely to be exposed to neighborhood traffic ( p = 0.02) but after adjusting for demographics and family history of asthma this was no longer statistically significant.

Risk Score 2, consisting solely of preoperatively available variables, also demonstrated marginal significance ( p = 0.08).

Furthermore, the proportion of cases showing intrathoracic progression among all events at the first relapse was 83.0% (112/135) in the chemotherapy-alone group, 58.3% (14/24) in the TRT group, and 77.6% (38/49) in the ICI group; the proportion in the TRT group was significantly lower than that in the chemotherapy-alone group (p=0.006) and showed a marginal significance in comparison with that in the ICI group (p=0.08).

Though the main effect of condition did not reach significance, F(1, 15) = 2.17, p = 0.16, the interaction between condition and target-distractor separation reached marginal significance, F(9, 135) = 1.75, p = 0.08.

The differences in PDFF for MF L4/5 , ES L4/5 , PM L3/4 , and PM L4/5 remained statistically significant after adjustment ( p < 0.05), while the difference in GM PDFF showed marginal significance ( p = 0.08) (Table 2 ).

However, there was noticeable variability in the degree of plasma concentration changes for our study, indicated by a high standard deviation in the immediate post-exercise plasma OSM concentrations with only marginal significance ( p = 0.080).

Although the interaction with surgery type approached marginal significance ( P = 0.080), it did not reach the conventional threshold.

However, in the occipital gyrus, accuracy was slightly higher in the TMS condition (99%) than on the no-TMS condition (96%), a difference which reached marginal significance ( t (9) = 1.96, p = 0.08, Cohen’s d = 0.62).

Consistent with our result from GZBCS mentioned earlier in this paper, breast cancer patients with low IL-8 signaling had better prognosis with marginal significance ( p =0.08, Figure 3A ).

The analysis of criterion (β) showed that only in the anodal condition, the mainly effect of tDCS stimulation reached a marginal significance ( F 1,9 = 3.89, p = 0.08).

The results showed positive correlation with statistical significance in IRS2 and CUL4A (r = 0.368; P = 0.001 and r = 0.401; P < 0.001, respectively) and marginal significance in TFDP1 (r = 0.188; P = 0.08).

Implicit Black-dangerous bias is negatively related to the force rate for Black officers ( B = −1.65; SE = 0.82; P = 0.04), and reduces the role of SDO to marginal significance ( B = −0.55; SE = 0.31; P = 0.08).

In the case of normalized ESR or CRP at 3 months, patients with normalized ESR or CRP at 3 months showed only a marginal significance in ASDAS-ID achievement (ESR, OR = 2.04; CI, 0.92–4.55; p = 0.080 and CRP, OR = 2.03; CI, 0.97–4.27; p = 0.060) ( Figure 3 A,C) but showed a significant difference in BASDAI-CRP attainment (ESR, OR = 3.29; CI, 1.42–7.46; p = 0.004 and CRP, OR = 2.73; CI, 1.32–5.62; p = 0.007), especially at 3 and 9 months (ESR: 3 months, p = 0.005; 9 months, p = 0.015 and CRP: 3 months, p < 0.001; 9 months, p = 0.021) ( Figure 3 B,D). 4.

Longer time spent on the chatbot was correlated with a larger reduction in vaccine hesitancy with marginal significance (Spearman ρ =0.26; P =.08).

For the CBAS dataset, a marginal significance ( p = 0.08) was observed for CSF p-tau level between the healthy and dementia groups.

The risk of heart failure increased slightly with marginal significance for an amlodipine-based regimen compared with a non-CCB-based regimen (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.31; p = 0.08).

We also found suggestive evidence for the association of genetically predicted sleep duration with early AMD, which showed a consistent direction of effect with a marginal significance (OR = 0.724, 95% CI = 0.503–1.041, P -value = 0.08).

By including these significant factors in a stepwise backward selection procedure, multivariable Cox regression model found LRN, MLD> 6cm, and cumulative cisplatin dose as independent predictors for DMFS (P<0.05), while ECE retained a marginal significance (P=0.08) ( Table 3 ).

These factors identified by univariate analysis were then applied to multivariate analysis, and GRB7 expression level showed marginal significance (P = 0.08) for the prognosis of ESCC patients in multivariate analysis.

The MR-unique volume ratio, calculated as V42days/V28days, reflects the examination conducted before radiochemotherapy and two weeks into the treatment, exhibited marginal significance when comparing survivors with a short term and long term prognosis ( p = 0.080).

Meanwhile, temperature (A) and SLS ratio (B) showed marginal significance ( p ≈ 0.08), while there existed negligible interactions effects (AB, AC, BC) which could be attributed to the dominant impact of TMP.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01–1.03; p = 0.001) and current smoking (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.30–3.29; p = 0.002) were independently associated with HMPV pneumonia, and that diabetes showed marginal significance (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.96–1.95; p = 0.08).

Post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that participants with marginal significance rated robots as more eerie after Interaction I ( M = 3.25, SD = 0.52) than after Interaction III ( M = 3.11, SD = 0.6), p = 0.08.

There was a marginal significance of the interaction effect between Switch Type and Language [ β = 0.37, SE β = 0.21, χ 2 (1) = 3.07, p = 0.080].