“marginal significance”

In our analysis of the effect of WMH pattern, we observed marginal significance in cortical thickness comparison of the temporal dWMH‐connected/unconnected cortex at high connectivity level (ratio = 0.962 ± 0.104, P = 0.071).

p21 survival curves showed a difference between lower levels of staining and DFS ( P = .003) and a marginal significance on OS ( P = .071).

ANGPTL4 (≥100) predicted short OS (HR: 1.17 [0.99, 1.38]) with a marginal significance ( P = 7.1 × 10 −2 ) [Table 4 (a) and Figure 5 (A)].

Data from Supplementary Table 3 demonstrates highly unequal contributions of individual lifestyle factors to mortality risk: no heavy alcohol drinking (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78–1.68, P = 0.484) and healthy diet (HR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74–1.06, P = 0.185) were not statistically significant; never smoking showed only marginal significance (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.68–1.02, P = 0.071); only physical activity demonstrated a consistently strong effect (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.47–0.70, P < 0.001).

Current smokers were observed to benefit less from azithromycin than former smokers with marginal significance in the logistic component of the τ ‐IBR model (MI: p = 0.071; EM: p = 0.083) and significance in the τ ‐RMST model ( p = 0.030).

Their mathematics anxiety also approached marginal significance, t (258) = 1.811, p = 0.071, Cohen’s d = 0.230.

Interestingly, our study demonstrated that the Asian or Pacific Islander ethnics background might reduce the risk of poor prognosis, with marginal significance (HR = 0.922; 95% CI, 0.844–1.007; p = 0.071).

In the case of clovamide, the quadratic model was significant overall ( p = 0.044) due to pronounced curvature effects of solvent composition and temperature, whereas time contributed minimally to model performance, with the quadratic effect of time showing only marginal significance ( p = 0.071).

The continuous value of PM thickness was negatively associated with HCC recurrence risk with a marginal significance (coefficient = −0.089 [9% increase in recurrence risk per unit decrease in PM thickness], hazard ratio (HR) = 0.92 [0.83–1.01], p = 0.071).

This pattern was also present numerically in V3/Vp and V3a/V4 but reached only marginal significance in V3/Vp ( t (26) = 2.02, P = 0.071) and was not significant in V3a/V4v ( t (26) = 1.24, P > 0.2).

Further analysis revealed that cognitive dissonance significantly positively predicted anger (β = 0.338, t = 6.21, p < .001), supporting hypothesis 2a; However, the positive prediction for shame only reached marginal significance (β = 0.136, t = 1.81, p = .071), partially supporting Hypothesis 2b.

In the FXTAS individuals with an APOε2 allele, a marginal significance was observed towards a larger decline in verbal IQ (VIQ) in individuals with an APOε4 allele compared to those without an APOε4 allele ( p = 0.071).

Associations of a high c-Met protein expression level and MET copy number gain with patient survival In the overall cohort, high c-Met protein expression tended to associate with inferior overall survival with marginal significance (P = 0.071; Fig. 3 A; supplementary Table 1 ).

But there was marginal significance between the subjects with threshold of 7 and the subjects with 6 or less ( p = 0.071).

There was a marginal significance between LPI profile and HOV profile ( p = 0.071).

The distribution of these four significantly explanatory variables along the ordination axes was further examined by GLM, which revealed a significant correlation ( P < 0.05) of all variables along axis 1 and axis 2, except a marginal significance in bio3 along axis 1 ( P = 0.0717, Table 4 ).

When MMP9, TIMP1 and RECK expression levels were analyzed according to surgical outcome, surprisingly we found that the median expression levels of MMP-9 was three times higher in children who were successfully treated by surgery ( n = 10) compared to those did not have success ( n = 6), with a marginal significance ( p = 0.072), TIMP-1 was underexpressed in 100 % of this cases ( p = 0.00) and RECK was overexpressed in 80 % of this same cases ( p = 0.082).

In the normal weight subgroup (BMI <23 kg/m 2 ), intriguingly, the highest ASM group had a lower risk of incident prediabetes and T2DM in a univariate analysis (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.74; P =0.015), and this association showed marginal significance after we adjusted for covariates (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.04 to 1.16; P =0.072).

BMI was found to be higher in the RSSC group with marginal significance (28.17 kg/m 2 vs. 27.17 kg/m 2 ; P = .072).

A marginal significance (p = 0.072) was observed between the wGRS and guttate psoriasis.

Although there was a marginal significance (p=0.072), the difference in complete remission rate between the two groups seemed to be the difference of prognosis after treatment.

The relationship between the lesion's cross-section and the opposite edge of the rectum showed marginal significance ( P = 0.072, OR: 7.500, 95 % CI: 0.759–74.157).

However, MICT only showed marginal significance (p = 0.072) compared to HIIT (p < 0.05).

When predicting negative affect, the interaction between quadratic time and lifetime stressors reached marginal significance ( p = 0.072) at > 15 stressors (outside Johnson–Neyman interval [−18 143.50, 15.65]).

The 14-3-3 σ positive results by immunohistochemistry were negatively associated with the hypermethylation of the 14-3-3 σ promoter, but only showed marginal significance ( p =0.072) ( Table 6 ).