The Mann–Whitney U test showed marginal significance (both p = 0.070 for HPV E6 and E7) between the baseline relative CT values for HPV DNA and disease progression. 3.5.
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
CRP levels display marginal significance ( P = .07) across CysC tertiles, failing to meet the predetermined threshold for statistical significance ( Table 1 ).
Also, the chance of a stink bug selecting mature pods (R7 and R8) instead of immature pods (R4 and R5) was 2.8 and 2.6 times higher in fifth instar nymphs than in adult females and adult males, respectively, at marginal significance levels ( p = 0.07).
The association between anxiety symptom load and cannabis frequency reached only marginal significance ( β = 0.177; t (348) = 1.82; 95% CI [−0.014, 0.368]; p = 0.070).
In relation to clinical variables, women who used antibiotics in the last month had a 1.9 times higher probability of being seropositive for HSV-2, showing marginal significance ( p = 0.07).
The level of prosodic boundaries achieved marginal significance (χ 2 = 9.91, p = .07).
Egger's regression test was significant ( P < 0.01), and Begg's regression test showed marginal significance ( P = 0.07).
Species that differed significantly were plotted, along with species differing with marginal significance (.05 < p < .07).
Additionally, catastrophizing and oral control showed marginal significance ( p =.07 and p =.08, respectively), suggesting potential trends that warrant further exploration.
The relationship of disturbing dreams to being currently on a diet was reduced to marginal significance ( p = 0.070), while the relationship with binge-eating remained significant ( p < 0.005).
However, this association achieved only marginal significance (p < 0.07).
Statistical analysis (ANOVA) showed marginal significance ( p = 0.07p = 0.07p = 0.07), indicating potential differences between groups, though further post-hoc testing would be needed to confirm specific group differences.
While there was no significant difference of the postoperative FEV 1 of each lobe between the CSS and single segmentectomy, the value of the CSS was higher than that of the multiple segmentectomy with marginal significance (p = 0.07).
Although in the expected direction, this change reached only marginal significance ( t (45) = 1.86, p = .07).
In fully adjusted models, among all participants, CRP had marginal significance as a mediator for SPS ( P =0.07), standing balance ( P =0.08), and was significant for the 4‐m walk ( P =0.04) (Figure 2 ).
In models not shown, arrest is positively associated with receipt of sterilization (e b = 1.62, p = 0.014); however, the association is diminished to marginal significance with the inclusion of controls ( p = 0.07) (see Table 2 ).
Time spent watching TV tended to be higher in the overweight group than in the normal-weight group, and this difference reached marginal significance (p = 0.07).
After 4 weeks, the differences between HIIT and CON in WC reached marginal significance ( p = 0.07).
Similarly, cART had no effect on Category Fluency, Action Fluency, or Letter Fluency T-scores, and no effect on the overall verbal fluency composite T-scores, although marginal significance was observed for Letter Fluency and verbal fluency composite T-scores ( d : 0.20; 95% CI: −0.02, 0.43, P = 0.07 and d : 0.19; 95% CI: −0.03, 0.41, P = 0.09, respectively).
When considering only the biased training phase (epochs 2–4), the interaction between the target’s general location and the direction of the rich quadrant reached marginal significance, F (1, 14) = 3.80, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.21.
However, a negative correlation between score gains and the occurrence of dreams related to the personal life of the participants in the prey role presented a marginal significance (Rho = -0.7660, adjusted p = 0.0702).
If we stratify the analysis by fusion status, RAC1 expression showed marginal significance for the fusion-negative (p= 0.07036) but not the fusion-positive cases (p=0.31) with respect to overall survival.
Average 5hmC beta values and 5mC beta values were negatively correlated, at marginal significance ( R = -0.72; p = 0.071), with increased global 5hmC and decreased global 5mC abundance in intermediate clones (EM2, EM3, M1; Figure 2 B & C).
Hypothesis 3c: For the AWI, there was marginal significance for the interaction between Organization of Information and the Order of Information [ F (1, 17) = 3.720, p = 0.071, Figure 12 ].
For washout period, a duration >30 days was linked to a lower risk of graft rejection (OR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.18–0.72, P =0.004), consistent across models: Model 1 OR=0.35 (95% CI: 0.17-0.70, P =0.003), Model 2 OR=0.38 (95% CI: 0.18-0.78, P =0.008), Model 3 OR=0.40 (95% CI: 0.18-0.86, P =0.019), Model 4 OR=0.37 (95% CI: 0.17-0.77, P =0.008), and Model 5 OR=0.36 (95% CI: 0.17-0.75, P =0.006); Model 6 showed marginal significance (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.16-1.11, P =0.071).