Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
Unlike the AU tests, the likelihood ratio test does not reject the H 0 hypothesis that the one-tree hypothesis (both genes have the same topology) is favored over the two-tree model (each gene has a different topology), although marginal significance is observed ( p = 0.072; out of the 500 replications performed 36 were found to have a smaller log-likelihood ratio statistic than the original data set, Additional file 2 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
A similar trend was observed in the HMW adiponectin/total adiponectin ratio in the HOMA index and HDL cholesterol but there was a weak correlation with marginal significance (β = 0.099 , p = 0.072) between the adiponectin ratio and ApoB/Apo AI ratio ( Table 3 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0721.4× alphagold
Unifactorial and multifactorial logistic analysis Calcification, cortex, lymphatic hilum, histological grade, ER, PR, HER-2, KI-67, cT, treatment response and cN were subjected to univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, and ultimately we found that LNR ( p = 0.009) and PR ( p = 0.032) were the independent prognostic factors affecting 1–3 SLN-positive breast cancer patients after NAT, and the short axis of lymph node reached marginal significance ( p = 0.072) (Table 2 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0731.5× alphagold
In contrast, at 6 months post-treatment there were significant, positive correlations between vitamin B6 levels and NAA (ρ = 0.523, p = 0.007), creatine (ρ = 0.413, p = 0.040), and choline (ρ = 0.489, p = 0.013) concentrations; and vitamin B12 and creatine concentrations (ρ = 0.406, p = 0.041), whereas there was marginal significance for choline concentration (ρ = 0.359, p = 0.073).
marginal significanceP = 0.0731.5× alphagold
Compared with the control ones, Tph2 +/+ AR (Figure 3A , LSD post-hoc t-tests , rat-exposure: P = 0.007; rat scent-exposure: P = 0.016), ERα (Figure 3A , LSD post-hoc t-tests , rat-exposure: P = 0.000; rat scent-exposure: P = 0.000) and GluR4 (Figure 3A , LSD post-hoc t-tests , rat-exposure: P = 0.016; rat scent-exposure: P = 0.073, marginal significance) expression were down-regulated.
marginal significancep = 0.0731.5× alphagold
A subsequent analysis showed that participants also tended to miss out more often on reward payout in the high than in the low reward condition, although the difference in number of trials quicker than the RT limit did only reach marginal significance, t (17) = 1.908, p = 0.073, 95% CI [−0.89, 17.66].