“marginal significance”

Higher frequency of invisible sclera was observed in the D and M types, as compared to the S type ( P < 0.001, P = 0.002) ( Table 4 ).Choroidal hyperthickening was more frequent in the CSC group as compared to the control group with marginal significance (36.7% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.030) ( Table 3 ).

S2) and we only observed marginal significance between rediversification microcosms for the farm soil (F 6,14 = 1, R 2 = 0.37, p = 0.03).

Nonzoonotic infectious diseases were correlated positively with Collectivism ( r = 0.53, p < 0.0001, n = 50), and so were zoonotic infectious diseases, but much less and with marginal significance ( r = 0.32, p = 0.03, n = 50).

Post hoc comparisons conducted on the Nd amplitudes (i.e., target minus nontarget difference) within 250–300 ms and 300–350 ms revealed that the representation‐driven Nd amplitude for auditory‐only stimuli tended to be smaller (with marginal significance) than that for audiovisual stimuli with visual‐spatial attention during 300–350 ms (250–300 ms: F (1,28) = 0.90, p FDR = .351, η 2 p = .03; 300–350 ms: F (1,28) = 3.83, p FDR = .080, η 2 p = .12), and was significantly smaller than that for audiovisual stimuli without visual‐spatial attention during 300–350 ms (250–300 ms: F (1,28) = 4.98, p FDR = .067, η 2 p = .15; 300–350 ms: F (1,28) = 12.63, p FDR = .005, η 2 p = .31).

Specifically, significant correlations emerge in the right PPA ( r (14) = 0.015, p = 0.007), the right LOC ( r (14) = 0.022, p = 0.006), and marginal significance for the left FFA ( r (14) = 0.006, p = 0.030; does not survive FDR correction).

On the other hand, the Placebo group’s median TV increased significantly from T0 (9552.14 mm 3 ) to the second trimester (10696.92 mm 3 ; p = 0.007), and continued to increase in the third (to 10862.54 mm 3 ; p = 0.0009), whereas the Iodine group’s median TV only increased significantly (by a marginal significance) in the third trimester (12368.46 mm 3 , as opposed to 11450.14 mm 3 at T0; p = 0.03).

Other VOCs, including (C5H10O)H + ( Fig 7 , Panel C), also showed significant changes at 1 hour (p = 0.0005) and marginal significance at 24 hours (p = 0.0309), but not thereafter.

Only marginal significance was noticed for the genotype and allele distributions between cases and controls ( P = 0.032 and 0.023, respectively).

For 2021, the smoking interaction term reached marginal significance (AOR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01–1.16, p = 0.032), suggesting that smoking declined somewhat less among single-person households relative to multi-person households in the later pandemic period; however, this effect was modest in magnitude.

On the multivariate analysis, the G12D/V mutation was associated with a poor prognosis in both cohorts, with marginal significance (HR = 2.015, 95% CI = 1.064–3.817, P = 0.032 in the discovery cohort; HR = 2.366, 95% CI = 1.109–5.046, P = 0.026 in the validation cohort).

However, instrumental heterogeneity was observed for HDL-C at the marginal significance level of 0.05 (p value=0.032) ( Figure 2 ).

Linkage disequilibrium in TcIIc Strongly significant (p<0.001, Table 1 ) linkage disequilibrium (measured using the Index of Association (I A )) was detected in all populations except BOL North where only marginal significance was observed (p = 0.032, Table 1 ).

However, in the near-clade TCIII, a strongly significant ( p < 0.001) LD (measured using the Index of Association (IA)) was detected in all populations except one, where only marginal significance was observed ( p = 0.032) ( Llewellyn et al., 2009a ).

No significant differences were found in ß1, ß3, and γ power, while ß2 showed marginal significance (p = 0.033).

Simple-effects analyses revealed that the between-group difference in TFD was not significant at VILs 1–3 ( p s > 0.05, d < 0.25), reached marginal significance at VIL 4 ( p = 0.033, d = 0.34), and became non-significant again at VILs 5–6 ( p s > 0.05, d < 0.19).

Overall analyses revealed a remarkably significant association between long sleep duration and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.16–1.33, P < .001), whereas only marginal significance was observed for short sleep duration (adjusted HR = 1.04; 95% CI: 1.00–1.09; P = .033).

Serum IL-6 levels between patients with CMM (median, 5.68 pg/ml; mean ± SEM), 20.57±5.89 pg/ml) and the control subjects (median, 4.17 pg/ml; mean ± SEM, 5.02±0.74 pg/ml) differed with marginal significance (P=0.033; Fig. 6 ).

However, chi-square test results showed a marginal significance for all columns combined ( χ 2 = 8.68; df = 3; P = 0.034) but not for ants on irrigation pipes ( χ 2 = 4.05; df = 3; P = 0.256) and ants in column 1 ( χ 2 = 7.37; df = 3; P = 0.061) with respect to time of day when counts were made.

A paired t-test comparing the means of the most visibly different groups, extended G0 and G2, shows only marginal significance (p = 0.034).

The effect size was marginal significance because when using efron method to deal with the ties, the hazard ratio was 0.748 (95%CI, 0.572-0.979, P=0.034).

Stimulation duration showed a significant effect (stimulus duration: χ 2 (1) = 43.784, p < 0.001), whereas the population group only showed marginal significance (groups: χ 2 (1) = 4.479, p = 0.034).

Four out of the 5 (80.0%) dysplasia-initiated tumor samples have mutations of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene, and this mutation frequency is higher than the mutation frequency of 31.0% that is reported in the COSMIC database even though the difference showed only marginal significance (P=0.0347).

Such rates for cg18210511and cg13719443 were not significantly correlated with age ( P = 0.099 and 0.602, respectively), although the rates for cg09580859 showed marginal significance ( P = 0.035).

PERMDISP analysis indicated no significant differences in community dispersion in Laos and Tanzania ( P > 0.05), whereas Côte d’Ivoire showed marginal significance (F-stat = 3.89, P = 0.035), suggesting greater within-group variability.

However, after full adjustment (Model 3), only niacin retained marginal significance (OR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–1.00, p = 0.035).