“marginal significance”

Attitudes towards violence In the waitlist orphanages (b 1 ), the difference between first and second follow-up reached marginal significance, ψ ^ = −0.76 (−1.52, 0.01), p < .025.

While insect numbers on the Mp_C002_dsRNA plants did not differ significantly from that on the empty vector control plants in either generation, the BestBet plants did show a reduction in aphid numbers at a marginal significance level in the second generation (p = 0.025; Fig. 3b ).

Among non-achievers, those with longer diabetes duration (≥10 years) had more oral antidiabetic medications [4.00 (3.75–4.00) vs 3.00 (2.50–3.50), p = 0.07] with marginal significance, and paradoxically lower 12-week TIR [62.00% (52.50–68.00) vs 87.00% (68.50–93.45%), p = 0.025] ( S3 Table ).

Equivalent exploratory stepwise regression models using left CIMT and mean CIMT as dependent variables confirmed that no predictor met the entry criterion for left CIMT, and sex showed only marginal significance for mean CIMT ( p = 0.025), consistent with the weaker and non-significant anthropometric correlations observed for left CIMT in Table 3 .

We did not find significance for the previously identified African allele, HLA-DRB1*15 : 03 at the pre-specified significance level of 1.0 x 10 −04 ; however, after conditioning on the three independent African classical alleles, marginal significance was seen (OR = 1.23, p = 2.53 x 10 −02 ), indicating that HLA-DRB1*15 : 03 does contribute to MS risk within this sample.

The statistics table also shows a slightly higher than expected decay rate in 2008 (p = 5.17e-04, log odds ratio = 0.458) which might account for the remaining marginal significance of the year variable overall (p = 0.0258 as computed by ANOVA procedure).

In addition, a small effect with marginal significance ( P = 0.0259) was observed for NP in 2011, in which the enhancing allele was derived from MY46.

It is worth noting that the variable OC, which showed marginal significance in the parametric test ( p = 0.026), was not statistically significant under the permutation test framework (Permutation p -value = 0.1).

Even for the non-validated genes a marginal significance was seen (p = 0,0263).

By 24 months, only low vitamin D retained marginal significance in univariate analysis (OR = 1.55, p = 0.027), but not after adjustment (adjusted OR = 1.14, p = 0.779) ( Table 2 ).

However, to date, the potential effects of specific glucose-lowering agents – that is, sulphonylurea (SU), glinides, metformin, thiazolidinediones, insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogs, or dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors – on CV events in patients with T2DM remain uncertain [5] , although some agents, such as metformin and pioglitazone, have been reported to reduce major cardiovascular events in a limited number of newly diagnosed low-risk obese patients (n = 342) with T2DM [6] or to reduce the risk with marginal significance ( p = 0.027) in high-risk patients with T2DM [7] , respectively.

The maximum activation of corrugator activity toward Sad faces subtracted from the activation toward Neutral ones in the spontaneous condition showed only marginal significance (p = .027, r = -.519).

However, as shown in Figure 1 , adjacent and triplet pairs exhibited a significant co-expression tendency compared to random pairs ( p <0.01, one-sided KS test), while quadruplet pairs only exhibited a marginal significance ( p =0.0272).

Pairwise comparisons of treatment conditions via one-way ANOVA and Dunett posthoc test reached only for the parameters protein amount per EV and number of EV per μg protein marginal significance for EVs derived from CPRP-treated 3D cultures ( p = 0.0278 and p = 0.0461, respectively).

Lastly, both groups showed decreased ΔRT and Δ%Error from the same real-face task to the different real-face task, with Δ%Error in the TD group showing marginal significance of ( p = 0.028, α = 0.025). 4 Discussion The current study utilized a set of modified flanker tasks with emotional faces to investigate the ability of social–emotional interference control in school-aged children with ASD, and three key findings were identified.

Marginal significance was observed for HLA-DQB2 ( P =0.028).

The marginal significance of DFS (P = 0.028) might be due to the limited sample size and the relatively small number of events.

The difference in Diff-BP showed marginal significance for SBP ( P = 0.029) and MBP ( P = 0.042).

No overall interaction between LE8 and APOE4 status was observed; however, a few single LE8 component x APOE4 interactions showed marginal significance among women or men ( p = 0.029 for BMI x APOE4 in women and p = 0.036 for Diet x APOE4 in men; Supplementary Table S11 ).

Although the imputation helped to capture the marginal significance of the mean difference of hair counts over time for the Young group (p-value = 0.0295), a linear trend of the hair growth was still not detected (p-value = 0.1054) from the post-hoc analysis as in the complete data case.

Metabolites from amino acid metabolism We observed reduced circulating levels of 15 out of 19 commonly detected amino acids (missing for cysteine), including three branched‐chain amino acids (BCAAs), and a marginal significance for phenylalanine (raw P = 0.03; adjusted P = 0.14), in different disease groups compared with NGT controls.

Higher frequency of invisible sclera was observed in the D and M types, as compared to the S type ( P < 0.001, P = 0.002) ( Table 4 ).Choroidal hyperthickening was more frequent in the CSC group as compared to the control group with marginal significance (36.7% vs. 10.0%, P = 0.030) ( Table 3 ).

Results showed a negative association between digital technology use and depression in male (DE: OR= 0.664, p= 0.001; DD: OR= 0.694, p= 0.001; DP: OR= 0.913, p= 0.001), along with similar results in female (DE: OR= 0.786, p= 0.053[marginal significance]; DD: OR= 0.791, p= 0.030; DP: OR= 0.922, p= 0.004).

Post hoc comparisons conducted on the Nd amplitudes (i.e., target minus nontarget difference) within 250–300 ms and 300–350 ms revealed that the representation‐driven Nd amplitude for auditory‐only stimuli tended to be smaller (with marginal significance) than that for audiovisual stimuli with visual‐spatial attention during 300–350 ms (250–300 ms: F (1,28) = 0.90, p FDR = .351, η 2 p = .03; 300–350 ms: F (1,28) = 3.83, p FDR = .080, η 2 p = .12), and was significantly smaller than that for audiovisual stimuli without visual‐spatial attention during 300–350 ms (250–300 ms: F (1,28) = 4.98, p FDR = .067, η 2 p = .15; 300–350 ms: F (1,28) = 12.63, p FDR = .005, η 2 p = .31).

Nonzoonotic infectious diseases were correlated positively with Collectivism ( r = 0.53, p < 0.0001, n = 50), and so were zoonotic infectious diseases, but much less and with marginal significance ( r = 0.32, p = 0.03, n = 50).