Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.0190.4× alphagold
In turn, in evaluating variations (Δ) summarized in Table 5 , although we found some marginal significance, the same biomarkers showed interesting results. the highest variation in MYO have been seen in participants with at least one R allele in ΔHELMET ( p = 0.019).
marginal significancep = 0.0190.4× alphagold
For the animal stimuli type, there was significantly higher brain activation in the congruent condition in the vlPFC, t (21) = 2.295, p = 0.032 (marginal significance after FDR corrected), the SupraMarginal gyrus (SMG), t (21) = 2.529, p = 0.019 (FDR corrected), and the angular gyrus, t (21) = 2.829, p = 0.010 (FDR corrected) compared with the baseline.
marginal significanceP =0.020.4× alphagold
crop height, number of tillers and root length, produced a marginal significance between soil textures ( P =0.02, df: 3, 212, F value: 4.96, F critical: 2.64, single factor ANOVA), with clay loam soils having the greatest reduction to crop biomass ( P =0.02, df: 69, t.stat: 2.14, paired unequal variance post hoc T test).
marginal significancep < 0.020.4× alphagold
As predicted, the presence of subtitles facilitates accent adaptation compared to exposure without subtitles: participants in the Concurrent and Delayed subtitle condition transcribed words more accurately during test than participants in the Absent condition without subtitles with marginal significance ( β ^ = 0.078 , z = 2.34, p < 0.02).
marginal significanceP = 0.0240.5× alphagold
Experiment 2: Diet, but not infection, affects egg protein content, and both bacterial infections are persistent Reducing dietary yeast by 75% significantly reduced egg protein content compared to the standard diet (marginal significance, P = 0.024); however, bacterial infection had no effect on egg protein content (Fig. 5 ; Table 4 ).
marginal significancep = 0.0250.5× alphagold
Equivalent exploratory stepwise regression models using left CIMT and mean CIMT as dependent variables confirmed that no predictor met the entry criterion for left CIMT, and sex showed only marginal significance for mean CIMT ( p = 0.025), consistent with the weaker and non-significant anthropometric correlations observed for left CIMT in Table 3 .