“marginal significance”

A marginal significance is found in terms of having concerns about community care among the three groups (P = 0.053).

For DFA-AP values, the main effect of eyes dropped to marginal significance (F(1,48) = 3.924, p = 0.053, η p 2 = 0.076), while the main effect of base and eyes X base interaction remained significant (see Supporting Information S3 ).

Changes in DLco were negatively correlated with the SUV max ( r = −0.465, P = 0.039) and SUV mean with marginal significance ( r = −0.439, P = 0.053).

The triglyceride level was significantly lower in light drinkers than in nondrinkers and was higher with a marginal significance ( p = 0.053) in heavy drinkers than in nondrinkers.

Changes in dietary behaviors significantly progressed ( P = 0.015) while that in exercise habits approached a marginal significance ( P = 0.053) after the intervention.

Compared to the best existing multi-modal approach (MM-TransFuse), our method showed significant improvements in AUC ( p = 0.008, DeLong test) and sensitivity ( p = 0.012), with marginal significance for specificity ( p = 0.053).

One variable showed marginal significance of association with NL: visits to diabetes clinic ( p = 0.053).

The percent of CD8 + T cells was significantly higher when C51 cells were co-cultured with responder immune cells as compared with non-responder ( p < 0.05) and naive ( p < 0.05) mice, reaching marginal significance (p = 0.053) when compared with co-culture with unspecific antigens ( Fig. 6A ).

The association reached statistical significance in EFEMP1 (P=0.006) and SVEP1 (P=0.011), and showed marginal significance in PRICKLE1 (P=0.053) and ABCA8 (P=0.055).

The EQ-5D index was lower in female survivors than in healthy controls with marginal significance (P=0.053). 3.

Also, at the age of 60 months, we recorded an almost double percentage of obese female patients who had BMI Z-score values above 2 compared to male patients, the difference being in this case only a marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.748 with p = 0.053) ( Table 4 ). 3.3.

Minimal dose (D min ) at gross tumor volume (GTV) < 35 Gy in biologically effective dose with α/β of 10 (Gy 10 ) was associated with worse LC with marginal significance in univariate analysis ( P = 0.053).

The results revealed two pathways potentially associated with Lac-Tyr, which reached marginal significance: the biosynthesis from tryptophan to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD + ) via quinolinate (adjusted P -value = 0.053), also known as Kynurenine pathway, and Mucin type O-glycan biosynthesis (adjusted P -value = 0.063).

Correlation of IL-2p40 with the Studied Parameters in All Individuals Serum levels of IL-12p40 did not correlate significantly with any of the studied parameters except for PT which had a marginal significance ( P = 0.053) ( Table 4 ). 4.

Post hoc analysis showed that HDL was different between the HP-non-eradicated and HP-eradicated groups with marginal significance (p=0.053 after Bonferroni correction), and BMI was different between the HP-uninfected and HP-eradicated groups (p=0.003) and between the HP-non-eradicated and HP-eradicated groups (p=0.041) ( Supplementary Table 1 ).

In The Bachelor shows, the main effect of cultural region exhibited only marginal significance, F (3, 97) = 2.66, p = 0.053, η 2 = 0.08.

saccharinum with marginal significance (Dunn’s test p = 0.053).

( 2016 ) found that the highest SUV max was a prognostic factor for PFS with marginal significance (HR: 1.078, p = 0.053).

The relationship between age and anger recognition only reached marginal significance ( P = 0.053).

In addition, a marginal significance of increased risk for BC with early differentiation (G1-G2) (adjusted OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.00-2.36, P = 0.053) was noticed.

Conjunctival goblet cell density The goblet cell density, for the oral uridine treatment group, at 1 and 3-months increased; however, the differences were not significant at 1 month ( P =0.660, Wilcoxon signed rank test) and showed only marginal significance at 3-months ( P =0.053, Wilcoxon signed rank test) ( Fig. 1C ).

Foot Kinematics As shown in Figure 5 , the peak ankle dorsiflexion demonstrated marginal significance (χ 2 (3) = 7.68, Kendell’s W = 0.256, p = 0.053).

However, no statistically significant interaction effects between BMI group and time were obtained in the sub-items, although group differences in the BOT-2 total and strength and agility percentile, showed marginal significance ( p = 0.053 and p = 0.083).

For parents, support provision was explained both by linear effects of their own anxiety ( B 1 = −0.30, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001) and by quadratic effects reflecting higher levels of their own anxiety, which reached marginal significance ( B 3 = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.053).

Additionally, HER2-positive patients exhibited higher EPIC1 expression with marginal significance, compared with that of luminal A-like patients [ p = 0.053; Figure 1(c) ].