“marginal significance”

For parents, support provision was explained both by linear effects of their own anxiety ( B 1 = −0.30, SE = 0.05, p < 0.001) and by quadratic effects reflecting higher levels of their own anxiety, which reached marginal significance ( B 3 = 0.07, SE = 0.04, p = 0.053).

Additionally, HER2-positive patients exhibited higher EPIC1 expression with marginal significance, compared with that of luminal A-like patients [ p = 0.053; Figure 1(c) ].

The EQ-5D index was lower in female survivors than in healthy controls with marginal significance (P=0.053). 3.

Also, at the age of 60 months, we recorded an almost double percentage of obese female patients who had BMI Z-score values above 2 compared to male patients, the difference being in this case only a marginal significance (χ 2 = 3.748 with p = 0.053) ( Table 4 ). 3.3.

A t-test with no expectation of direction found this difference to have marginal significance ( p = 0.0530). 3.5.

The triglyceride level was significantly lower in light drinkers than in nondrinkers and was higher with a marginal significance ( p = 0.053) in heavy drinkers than in nondrinkers.

The incidence of secondary procedures was reduced at a marginal significance (OR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.53-1.00, P = 0.053) when comparing IMN to MIPO, and was significantly reduced when comparing IMN to plate fixation in the subgroup excluding open fractures (OR = 0.67, 95%CI 0.47–0.94, P = 0.021).

Kim et al 20 reported similar findings, with a marginal significance ( P = .053) in the relationship between lower ADC values and ER-positive patients.

Four of these studies [ 17 , 44 , 48 , 49 ] indicated statistically significant benefits, while one study [ 47 ] reported marginal significance ( p = 0.053), and two studies [ 43 , 45 ] showed no statistically significant differences between the hepatectomy combined with EBRT and hepatectomy alone.

Minimal dose (D min ) at gross tumor volume (GTV) < 35 Gy in biologically effective dose with α/β of 10 (Gy 10 ) was associated with worse LC with marginal significance in univariate analysis ( P = 0.053).

GLS2 expression exhibited a trend toward higher levels in the Basal subtype, with marginal significance ( p =.053), suggesting a potential subtype-specific role that may warrant further investigation (Fig. 5 b and c).

Post hoc analysis showed that HDL was different between the HP-non-eradicated and HP-eradicated groups with marginal significance (p=0.053 after Bonferroni correction), and BMI was different between the HP-uninfected and HP-eradicated groups (p=0.003) and between the HP-non-eradicated and HP-eradicated groups (p=0.041) ( Supplementary Table 1 ).

One variable showed marginal significance of association with NL: visits to diabetes clinic ( p = 0.053).

The highest SUV max was a prognostic factor for PFS with marginal significance (1 unit increase, HR: 1.078, P = 0.053).

Notably, BNP (β = 0.796, p < 0.001), CPB (β = 0.512, p = 0.012), BMI (β = -0.421, p = 0.023), and MIS (β = -0.488, p = 0.042) remained statistically significant, while ICU days demonstrated marginal significance (p = 0.053).

The qPCR result indicated that mRNA level of Cx43 was reduced significantly in miR-218-5p group ( p <0.05) and marginal significance in miR-186-5p group ( p =0.053), but increased in miR-135b group ( Figure 2F ).

Nurses aged more than 30 reported higher levels of anxiety than those aged 30 or less with a marginal significance ( p = 0.053).

Foot Kinematics As shown in Figure 5 , the peak ankle dorsiflexion demonstrated marginal significance (χ 2 (3) = 7.68, Kendell’s W = 0.256, p = 0.053).

3G ) were confirmed lower in plasmas of LUADs than HCs but only reaching marginal significance ( P = 0.053).

No significant association between BMI1 and overall survival rate was observed in cases of T-LBL (P=0.237), and marginal significance was noted (P=0.053) in cases of ENKTL ( Supplementary Figure 3 ).

As for its statistical analysis result, it showed only marginal significance ( P = 0.053) in the final multivariable model, but it was retained after the rigorous screening process.

Full model (BRI + BMI + WC) In the full model, BRI Q4 retained marginal significance (OR = 11.70, P = 0.053), while BMI-based and waist-based obesity remained non-significant.

In addition, IL-1RA concentrations differed with a statistically marginal significance ( p = 0.0535) between the two severity subgroups.

S7 , the low NLR cutoff subgroup exhibited predictive value for AKI (OR 1.526, 95% CI 1.38–1.68, p < 0.001) without significant inter-study heterogenicity ( I 2 = 29.1%), whereas the high-cutoff group showed limited predictive utility with marginal significance (OR 1.334, 95% CI 1.00–1.79, p = 0.0535) and the heterogenicity in this subgroup remained significant ( I 2 = 93%).

( 42 ), NLR had a statistically significant association with ORR (p = 0.016), while PLR had a marginal significance (p = 0.0536). 3.2.6 Head and neck cancers A study by Lee et al.