“marginal significance”

No significant effects were found at 12-months follow-up (T2 vs T0), though the marginal significance of the regression coefficients of social functioning (β = 0.41, p = .052) and psychosocial functioning (β = 0.42, p = .081; Fig. 5 ) indicated a long-term effect of the intervention at T2. 4 Discussion and conclusion 4.1 Discussion The results of this RCT indicate a positive effect of Op Koers Online for adolescents, an online psychosocial group intervention for adolescents with different types of CI: the intervention had a positive effect on disease-related coping skills (use of relaxation, social competence and information seeking) and on HRQoL (social, school, psychosocial and total).

Regarding Final Pitch Span, the main effect of Length was dominant [ F (1, 701.70) = 34.70, p < 0.001], whereas the effect of Group reached only marginal significance ( p = 0.052).

Norepinephrine infusion rates decreased in the non-RR and RR groups, but with marginal significance for the RR group (p = 0.052).

There was marginal significance in the associations of VDBP levels and rs4588 variants ( P = 0.052).

While the combined delayed recall (A + B) approached marginal significance ( p = .052) for the divorced/separated group, no other significant differences were observed.

However, this was not the case in the present study, in which the HR of CrCl values of <30 mL/min showed only marginal significance for thromboembolic events in the univariate analysis ( P = 0.052, Table 3 ), though the P -value exceeded 0.30 in the multivariate analysis ( Table 4 ).

With SH-SY5Ys, an overall one-way ANOVA reached marginal significance between all brands of serum: Fig. 5A ( p = 0.052) and Fig. 5B ( p = 0.046).

As for older patients, mitral reoperation rates seemed to grow, too, despite marginal significance ( p = .0523).

However, CADD scores of two candidate SNPs (rs10975820 [ KANK1 : R130C19.3 ] and rs4465021 [ KDM4C ]) not identified as lead SNPs, exceeded this threshold (Table 2 ). The Fisher’s exact tests of the lead SNPs comparing the proportions of heterozygous and homozygous alternate genotypes resulted in three of the four lead SNPs being significant ( p < 0.05) and one having a marginal significance ( p = 0.0525) (Table 3 and Online Resource 4 ).

However, it reached only marginal significance ( P = 0.0526).

Difference in PPD reduction at 8w showed marginal significance (-1.74 ± 0.68 vs -1.46 ± 0.64, test vs control, P = 0.0526) (Table 2 ).

In fact, the mean angular deviation for the surface registration protocol (4.96 ± 3.32o) was larger than the fiducial marker registration protocol (3.38 ± 1.81o), with marginal significance ( p = 0.0526).

A marginal significance is found in terms of having concerns about community care among the three groups (P = 0.053).

The interaction effect of block and the order of block approached marginal significance, F (1, 25) = 4.139, p = 0.053, η 2 p = 0.142 (Figure 3A ).

Among the M1 stage subgroup of 51 patients, NEK9 and EG5 showed a significant positive correlation (r = 0.350 and P = 0.013) and EG5 and acetyl-α-tubulin also did so with marginal significance (r = 0.276 and P = 0.053; Table 3 ).

The trend of sporadic cases was the same for unselected cases but with a marginal significance (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.94 for the C/T genotype and OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.49-2.13 for the C/C genotype compared to the T/T genotype, P = .053; Table 3 ).

Animal dander showed marginal significance in seasonal difference of the skin sensitization; 12.5% and 20.3% in winter and summer ( P =0.053).

One variable showed marginal significance of association with NL: visits to diabetes clinic ( p = 0.053).

Kim et al 20 reported similar findings, with a marginal significance ( P = .053) in the relationship between lower ADC values and ER-positive patients.

However, the difference was nonsignificant, except for a marginal significance for OS in patients with T4 classification (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.48–1.00, p = 0.053; Table 3 ).

31.82 ± 5.72 F; P = 0.053, marginal significance).

Changes in DLco were negatively correlated with the SUV max ( r = −0.465, P = 0.039) and SUV mean with marginal significance ( r = −0.439, P = 0.053).

β 2 ‐MG showed marginal significance in multivariate analysis of TTFT ( P = .053).

Post hoc analysis showed that HDL was different between the HP-non-eradicated and HP-eradicated groups with marginal significance (p=0.053 after Bonferroni correction), and BMI was different between the HP-uninfected and HP-eradicated groups (p=0.003) and between the HP-non-eradicated and HP-eradicated groups (p=0.041) ( Supplementary Table 1 ).

Foot Kinematics As shown in Figure 5 , the peak ankle dorsiflexion demonstrated marginal significance (χ 2 (3) = 7.68, Kendell’s W = 0.256, p = 0.053).