The quality of the teacher–child relationship also reached marginal significance in terms of gender ( t (511) = −1.93, p = 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.17), which meant that left-behind girls ( M girs = 3.92, SD = 0.62) had a higher relationship quality with their teachers than boys ( M boys = 3.81, SD = 0.60).
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
NBRM The NBRM applied to the regions of the European part of the RF (Zone 1 at Figure 1 ) identified the following significant factors associated with the intensity of ASF outbreaks among wild boars: the proportion of forest cover, the number of ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs, and the density of the wild boar population (the latter with a marginal significance level of p =0.05) ( Table 2 ).
6 , which showed marginal significance for all three variables ( P = 0.05, 0.06, 0.05, respectively).
The AUC of the Inception-ResNet-v2 (AUC 0.876 (95% CI 0.873–0.879)) was higher than the AUC of the worst performing endoscopist with a marginal significance (AUC 0.723 (95% CI 0.662–0.779), p = 0.05). 3.4.
In terms of study design, cohort studies showed higher UA levels in severe cases with marginal significance ( P = 0.05, Hedges’ g = 2.49, 95% CI 0.02–4.97, I 2 = 98.11%, 2 studies), while cross-sectional studies did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.08, Hedges’ g = 4.00, 95% CI − 0.44 to 8.44, I 2 = 99.09%, 4 studies).
Statistical significance and marginal significance were considered at P < 0.05 and 0.05 ≤ P < 0.10.
In the motivated effort model, only the group effect that had already being observed across all load conditions achieved marginal significance ( b = -3.02, t = -1.97, p = 0.05, n = 54), but no effect of maximum digit span ( b = -0.48, t = -0.90, p = 0.37, n = 54) or motivated effort ( b = 0.04, t = 0.20, p = 0.84, n = 54) was found.
3 ), marginal significance was achieved in the allele model (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.00~1.72, P = 0.05) and homozygote model (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.01~3.34, P = 0.05) of the Euro-descendant subgroup.
The high Pb burden might result from consuming Chinese herbal medicines, even though marginal significance ( p = 0.05).
LDL-C levels showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05) in favor of intervention [ 44 , 46 , 113 ](Fig. 7 ).
Pretreatment levels of blood cytokines were also analyzed, which showed significant associations with treatment outcomes for IL-22 ( p = 2.4e-03) and IL-18 ( p = 1.1e-03), while CCL20 exhibited marginal significance ( p = 5.0e-02) (Fig. 5E and Supplementary Fig. 16 ).
In addition, marginal significance was observed for poor overall survival in patients with frontal lesions (Log rank test: p = 0.050) ( Table 6 ).
Regarding educational subjects, the field of teacher training shows a positive coefficient of 0.80, with marginal significance ( p = 0.05).
In addition, tumor size was positively correlated with Bcl-2 expression in luminal cells (r = 0.4; P<0.0001) and marginal significance was found for a negative correlation with Bax IRS scale in luminal cells (r = -0.2; P = 0.05).
In the HBOT group, PPT increased in 70.8 ± 90.6 kPa, compared to increase of 20.1 ± 85.7 kPa in the MED group, group-by-time interaction demonstrated marginal significance with medium effect size (d = 0.57, p = 0.05).
TACE, performed within 1-month post-RT, was a favorable OS prognostic factor with marginal significance (1-year OS, 60.6% vs. 26.9%, p = 0.05; Fig. 3 ).
Another retrospective study including 441 NAFLD cases and 441 propensity score-matched controls demonstrated that NAFLD independently increased the risk of overall CRN occurrence with marginal significance (adjusted HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.71; p = 0.05) [ 35 ].
Higher levels of O 3 suggested a marginal significance with daytime attacks of breathlessness ( p = 0.05).
There was a marginal significance between VI detected by 3D reconstruction and pN1 (p = .050).
We found a marginal significance when comparing wound swabs and biopsies in terms of unsuccessful isolation of pathogens (20 vs. 17, p = 0.05).
During logistic regression, the CRP level remained significant (OR 12.1 p = 0.025), but vascular surgery showed marginal significance (OR = 5.6, p = 0.05).
The first three parameters were significantly related to prognosis (p = 0.043, p = 0.033, and p = 0.002, respectively), while TRG displayed marginal significance (p = 0.050).
Cognitive strategies retained marginal significance (β = 0.18, p < .05), while compensatory strategies showed no significant unique contribution after accounting for other variables.
Incident T2D, CHF, and CKD were associated with a steeper decline in RMR, independent of age, sex, and body composition ( p < 0.05), while incident OA was associated with an increase in RMR with marginal significance ( p = 0.05) ( Figure 2 and Figure 3 A).
The increase in ApoC-III concentrations correlated significantly with fasting blood glucose (FBG) (r = 0.25, p = 6.1 × 10 −5 ) and T2D (r = 0.20, p = 0.002) in Asians Indians while in Hispanics, ApoC-III levels correlated with marginal significance with waist (r = 0.22, p = 0.05) and waist-hip ratio (WHR) (r = 0.24, p = 0.04) and with T2D (r = 0.20, p = 0.04) (Supplementary Fig. 3).