Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginal significance”

5,069 sentences · 5,069 papers · 6,913 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
In the motivated effort model, only the group effect that had already being observed across all load conditions achieved marginal significance ( b = -3.02, t = -1.97, p = 0.05, n = 54), but no effect of maximum digit span ( b = -0.48, t = -0.90, p = 0.37, n = 54) or motivated effort ( b = 0.04, t = 0.20, p = 0.84, n = 54) was found.
Objective Versus Subjective Effort in Schizophrenia.
Front Psychol · 2020 · PMC7365134
marginal significanceP <0.051.0× alphagold
AfA, HA and AsA adolescents We observed directionally consistent effect estimates in AfA (25 SNPs), HA (30 SNPs) and AsA (24 SNPs) adolescents relative to published results from European-descent populations, with greater than expected number of nominally significant SNP associations in AfA (eight), marginal significance in AsA (five), but not HA (three) based on a binomial draw at P <0.05 ( Figure 2 , Table 2 , and Supplementary Table 1 ).
marginal significancep = 0.051.0× alphagold
After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors (M1), family psychiatric history (M2), pregnancy complications (M3), and maternal substance-use (M4), the effect of fetal growth on ADHD symptoms was reduced to non-significance in ABCD ( B = 0.04, 95% CI = -0.003 – 0.08, t = 1.78, p = 0.08) and to marginal significance in GUI ( B = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.001–0.07, t = 1.98, p = 0.05).
marginal significancep =0.051.0× alphagold
NBRM The NBRM applied to the regions of the European part of the RF (Zone 1 at Figure 1 ) identified the following significant factors associated with the intensity of ASF outbreaks among wild boars: the proportion of forest cover, the number of ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs, and the density of the wild boar population (the latter with a marginal significance level of p =0.05) ( Table 2 ).
marginal significancep > 0.051.0× alphagold
For each response variable, separate models were run using CS, UN, or UN (1) as alternative covariance structures; the one with the lowest AICC value was selected for the final analysis, and the lowest level interaction with statistical significance ( p < 0.05) or marginal significance (0.1 > p > 0.05) was selected for the error term and comparisons of means (LSD, p < 0.05).