“marginal significance”

Though ACs showed marginal significance (* p < 0.05), the migratory improvement was far weaker than that of hCMEC/D3.

In the Active-Treatment cancer group, there was a moderate positive correlation between neutralizing antibody titers and avidity with marginal significance ( ρ = 0.324, p = .050).

Specifically, CTSS showed a clear separation in survival outcomes between the higher- and lower-expression cohorts ( p = 0.0042), while NRG1 showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05).

Therefore, P -values were interpreted cautiously, and variables with marginal significance ( P ≈ 0.05) were further evaluated within multivariable models.

Age showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05).

Excluding associations with a P-HEIDI of less than 0.01, 2729 CpG sites associated with 1254 genes met the threshold for marginal significance ( P < 0.05).

However, a marginal significance is observed in the interaction between adherence status and age (F = 3.093, p = 0.050), hinting at a potential joint impact on hallucination symptoms.

Both of them showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05), which may be related to the fluency state being a higher psychological state of competitive sports psychology, and it may also be related to the level of athletes’ trait mindfulness and the time effect of mindfulness training.

Additionally, intra-arrest BCR also had marginal significance in predicting neurological outcome at discharge in this cohort (aOR, 1.067; 95% CI, 1.000–1.138; p = 0.050).

Both for behavioral and ERP data, main and interaction effects that reached statistical or marginal significance levels ( p < 0.05 or p < 0.08, respectively) in comparison of interest are reported.

NBRM The NBRM applied to the regions of the European part of the RF (Zone 1 at Figure 1 ) identified the following significant factors associated with the intensity of ASF outbreaks among wild boars: the proportion of forest cover, the number of ASF outbreaks in domestic pigs, and the density of the wild boar population (the latter with a marginal significance level of p =0.05) ( Table 2 ).

For each response variable, separate models were run using CS, UN, or UN (1) as alternative covariance structures; the one with the lowest AICC value was selected for the final analysis, and the lowest level interaction with statistical significance ( p < 0.05) or marginal significance (0.1 > p > 0.05) was selected for the error term and comparisons of means (LSD, p < 0.05).

AfA, HA and AsA adolescents We observed directionally consistent effect estimates in AfA (25 SNPs), HA (30 SNPs) and AsA (24 SNPs) adolescents relative to published results from European-descent populations, with greater than expected number of nominally significant SNP associations in AfA (eight), marginal significance in AsA (five), but not HA (three) based on a binomial draw at P <0.05 ( Figure 2 , Table 2 , and Supplementary Table 1 ).

In the simultaneous approach, SNPs that fall below the marginal significance thresholds ( p = 0.05 and p = 0.1) in stage 1 are selected and tested for within-group pairwise interaction in stage 2.

Since we know that there is a discordance between TruSeq and trio analyses, we recalculated the preceding ratios, with the phase for 108 discordant SNPs assigned from trio analysis, and obtained statistically marginal significance ( P -value = 0.05, by the two sample proportion test) for the difference in values of the ratio: 2.14 and 1.83 for in-phase and out-of-phase SNPs, respectively.

First, axial elongation varied significantly with the axis orientation of astigmatism in the combined cohort ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.037) and the younger cohort ( P = 0.031, η 2 = 0.024), demonstrating a marginal significance in the older cohort ( P = 0.050, η 2 = 0.043).

In the motivated effort model, only the group effect that had already being observed across all load conditions achieved marginal significance ( b = -3.02, t = -1.97, p = 0.05, n = 54), but no effect of maximum digit span ( b = -0.48, t = -0.90, p = 0.37, n = 54) or motivated effort ( b = 0.04, t = 0.20, p = 0.84, n = 54) was found.

In addition, marginal significance was observed for poor overall survival in patients with frontal lesions (Log rank test: p = 0.050) ( Table 6 ).

Additionally, certain indicators exhibited marginal significance differences (0.1 > p > 0.05), such as DriSucc% in the elite group and GCA, ShortCmp, Def 3rd, Mid 3rd and DriMis in the control group.

Of the five pairwise joint models including eight unique genes, all the associations were attenuated below the TWAS significance level, but retained marginal significance (p < 0.05).

Aerobic exercise (1 study) showed marginal significance (SMD = −0.43, 95% CI [−0.85, 0.00], p = 0.05).

In the HBOT group, PPT increased in 70.8 ± 90.6 kPa, compared to increase of 20.1 ± 85.7 kPa in the MED group, group-by-time interaction demonstrated marginal significance with medium effect size (d = 0.57, p = 0.05).

Results showed a higher survival rate for patients without vocal cord palsy, while those without IONM and with palsy had the worst survival rate, which approached marginal significance ( p = 0.05–0.1). 3.4.

In this study, the previously meaningful parameter (the IPV 14 ratio) used during SE with balloon distension showed a marginal significance between the BFT responders and non-responders ( P = 0.050) ( Table 3 ).

E = 0.448, p < 0.001), and DSP showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05).