“marginal significance”

At β200, the increase reached marginal significance with t(24) = 2.07, p = 0.049; higher β levels remained significant.

Overall, the BMI decreased (mean change: 0.54) with marginal significance ( p =0.049), but the decrease within the treatment groups was significant.

Within treatment groups and control groups, significant difference of BMD was found as longer LoE with higher BMD ( p < 0.001); however intra-group comparison of ZA and control groups, only a marginal significance was found between long-term ZA-treated group and long-term control group ( p =0.049).

Comparison of the PA Intensities of the Cholesterol Polyps, Adenomas, and Adenocarcinomas The comparison of the normalized PA intensities among the cholesterol polyps, adenomas, and adenocarcinomas using the Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated that there was marginal significance in their differences at 765 nm (median, 0.67 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.78; p = 0.049).

Causal effects of BC survival In the in-depth analysis of BC survival rates, we unveiled a suggestive risk impact of blood UREA on overall BC survival, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.230 and a 95% CI ranging from 1.000 to 1.513, reaching marginal significance ( P = 0.049).

The permutation testing also confirmed a significant correlation ( p < 0.001) between the predicted and observed scores except for the marginal significance in the Digit Span Forward test ( p = .049).

Qat chewing status was an additional predictor of CAL (OR = 4.74) with marginal significance ( P = 0.049).

For patients with subclinical hypothyroidism TSH values were 12.3, 10.4–14.0 (95% CI 11.2–14.8) mU/L in patients with diabetes and 10.9, 9.4–13.8, (95% CI 10.7–13.7) mU/L in persons without diabetes, with a marginal significance ( p = 0.049); and FT4 values were 14.2 ± 0.39 (95% CI 11.5–12.0) pmol/L [1.1 ± 0.03 (95% CI 0.89–0.93) ng/dL] and 14.2 ± 0.3 (95% CI 11.8–14.2) pmol/L [1.1 ± 0.02 (95% CI 0.92–1.1) ng/dL], respectively, p = NS.

The two groups showed marginal significance in sex ratio (healthy subjects: 68.1% male subjects; psychosis: 83.1% male subjects; χ 2 1 = 3.87, p = 0.049), and the WASI FSIQ (four subtests) in the schizophrenia group was significantly lower than that in the healthy group (healthy subjects: 111.79 ± 11.92; psychosis: 100.89 ± 16.87; t 119 = −4.10, p < 0.001).

found prior irradiation to be the only independent risk factor for wound dehiscence on logistic regression analysis, reflecting the potentially confounding influence of PMRT on complication profile, but this finding achieved only marginal significance ( p = 0.049) [ 34 ].

[ 37 ] reported that patients with <15 lymph nodes examined and tumor size of >3 cm could achieve DSS benefit from AC with marginal significance ( P = 0.049).

There was a difference in the proportion of positive versus negative results between these two HPV mRNA tests, with marginal significance under the McNemar test ( p = 0.049).

Two SNPs showed association with VIQ, a third showed marginal significance (rs760761: p = 0.049; rs2619522: p = 0.052; rs2619538: p = 0.029).

Between-dimension difference tests showed marginal significance (Q_between = 7.82, p = 0.049) (Table 3 ).

Among these, lower preoperative HbA1c level was most potent predictor on DM remission after surgery with marginal significance (P = 0.0495).

The model produced an F-value of 3.86 with marginal significance ( p = 0.0497), indicating that while it explains a significant amount of variation in survival rates, unmeasured interactive effects and inherent biological variability in bacterial stress responses may limit predictive accuracy.

By qPCR, AD cases showed reduced PLD3 mRNA levels, when compared with the levels in non-AD cases at a marginal significance level ( P =0.0499) (Figure 2 a,b).

Offline engagement was partially explained in the model including readiness to change as the predictor but with marginal significance ( F 3 =2.719; R 2 =0.111; P =.05).

In addition, marginal significance was observed for poor overall survival in patients with frontal lesions (Log rank test: p = 0.050) ( Table 6 ).

Marginal significance was found in anatomical (group 1:80%, group 2:96.6%, group 3:96%, group 4:96.4%, p = 0.05) but not functional success (group 1:85%, group 2:85.7%, group 3:83.3%, group 4:88.9%, p = 0.75) at postoperative 12-month.

After eliminating associations with a P‐HEIDI value less than 0.01, a total of 4,880 CpG sites around 285 distinct genes met the criteria for marginal significance ( p < 0.05), as shown in Table S3 .

Direct association of FOXP3 + TILs with VSA t2 was noted (marginal significance p = 0.05; Fig. 4 e).

In addition, grade 3 or higher adverse effects due to CT were more frequent in the PTR group with marginal significance (OR: 1.74, 95% CI, 0.99–3.06, P = 0.05), and other adverse outcomes were comparable.

Male hamsters exhibited a weaker positive linear association that reached marginal significance (p < 0.05).

Interestingly, we found that tumors with 9p21.3 deletion had lower level of CD8 + tumor infiltration lymphocytes (TILs) than those without 9p21.3 deletion, with marginal significance (Student’s t -test, P = 0.05; Supplementary Fig. 10a ).