“marginal significance”

Age showed marginal significance (OR 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.00–1.03, p = 0.048), though the clinical impact of this 2% increased risk per year is limited.

However, HER2 status demonstrated marginal significance (p = 0.048), and a higher proportion of patients with high T stage (T2 and T3) and high N stage (N2 and N3) were observed in the ALNM high burden group.

However, the PD-SCD group exhibited FA reductions limited in the FMajor relative to the HC group, reaching only marginal significance ( p = 0.048).

Before PO there was no difference among treatment groups, but after PO there was marginal significance across groups for mildly elevated transaminases ( P = 0.048).

Sex distribution showed marginal significance across groups ( P = 0.048, chi-square test).

This is particularly troubling because the observed marginal significance (p=0.048) raises the possibility of type I error.

However, when we adjusted to BMI, the difference was then only marginal significance between the two groups (p = 0.048).

Note that block design demonstrated marginal significance ( p = 0.048), while also picture completion and block design scores were intercorrelated ( r = 0.6).

No significant association was observed between salt intake and WC ( P = 0.2022), whereas only a marginal significance was noted for BMI ( P = 0.0488) in men.

Alcohol consumption showed marginal significance in hypercholesterolemia (8.94%; p = 0.049). 3.3 Comparative oral health profiles Results in Table 2 showed significant links between hypertension, self-perceived oral health, dental checkup frequency, and presence of filled teeth (all p < 0.001).

In meta-analysis, Cochrane’s Q test statistic, a test of heterogeneity among the studies, which was not significant for all these SNPs (except rs5015480 of HHEX gene with marginal significance, p = 0.049) also showed consistent association in fixed-effect as well as random effects model.

While gestational age at delivery reached marginal significance ( p value = 0.049), markedly increased incidence in preterm birth (< 37 weeks) and very preterm birth (< 34 weeks) were observed among overweight and obese women (both p value < 0.001).

By comparison, the relationship between spiral index and CCI was weaker in the coarse version of the task, which was reflected by a marginal significance ( p = 0.049, Spearman rank correlation) in monkey R, and non-significance ( p = 0.89, Spearman rank correlation) in monkey A.

DNA quality did not affect the number of loci identified on the passing‐filter reads ( p ‐value = 0.303; Figure 2E ) but lowered their quality with marginal significance (i.e., non‐redundant depth: p ‐value = 0.049; missing data: p ‐value = 0.019; Figure 2F ).

Overall, the BMI decreased (mean change: 0.54) with marginal significance ( p =0.049), but the decrease within the treatment groups was significant.

Only one miRNA, miR-22, was validated with marginal significance, to have differential expression between the three groups (p=0.049).

The two groups showed marginal significance in sex ratio (healthy subjects: 68.1% male subjects; psychosis: 83.1% male subjects; χ 2 1 = 3.87, p = 0.049), and the WASI FSIQ (four subtests) in the schizophrenia group was significantly lower than that in the healthy group (healthy subjects: 111.79 ± 11.92; psychosis: 100.89 ± 16.87; t 119 = −4.10, p < 0.001).

Among non-Hispanic Blacks, marginal significance was noted in the unadjusted and partially adjusted models (Model 2: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.00–1.61, P = 0.049), but this link disappeared in the fully adjusted model.

In this study, only nonfatal MI reached the marginal significance between groups ( P =0.049), which may be associated with the longer life expectancy and more atherosclerosis risk factors in nonoctogenarians.

Within treatment groups and control groups, significant difference of BMD was found as longer LoE with higher BMD ( p < 0.001); however intra-group comparison of ZA and control groups, only a marginal significance was found between long-term ZA-treated group and long-term control group ( p =0.049).

Land use access (C) reached marginal significance ( p = 0.049), while the remaining subscales did not differ between groups. 3.2.

These individuals also showed a trend toward more advanced clinical characteristics (Supplementary Table 2 ), reaching marginal significance for Hoehn & Yahr scores ( p = 0.049).

At β200, the increase reached marginal significance with t(24) = 2.07, p = 0.049; higher β levels remained significant.

No association was recorded between infection status and proteinuria except for the first visit which showed marginal significance ( p =0.049) ( Table 3 ).

There was a difference in the proportion of positive versus negative results between these two HPV mRNA tests, with marginal significance under the McNemar test ( p = 0.049).