“highly significant”

1 and Supplementary Data ); this difference was highly significant ( P = 0.0005).

It was observed that, for general empathy, the factors Year and Gender were highly significant (p = .0005 and p = .021 respectively), the value of eta-squared (0.056) was satisfactory, and the power observed (0.998) is good.

In comparison, NP‐UAEC linear correlations between AUC and V m change were more highly significant ( P < 0.0005) and more predictive in showing greater hyperpolarization as AUC increased for both the initial peak and sustained [Ca2+]i phases.

Differences were considered significant with a P-value below 0.05 (p < 0.05, *), highly significant (p ≤ 0.005, **) and extremely significant (p ≤ 0.0005, ***).

Tetramers with RNAmotifs Fisher’s p-values ≤ 0.05 (or the 1 st percentile of the p-value distribution in case of highly significant results) and empirical p-values ≤ 0.0005 were considered as enriched and retained for further analysis ( Table S5 ).

The differences between the L p values at 0°C and those at 10°C were highly significant (p<0.0005).

Risk of LE rose across the cardiovascular disease risk scores in a highly significant trend ( p = 0.0005) (see Fig. 1 ).

Results showed that there was a strong positive correlation between growth rate and pathogen virulence (as evaluated by relative lesion height), which was very highly significant ( r = 0.817, n = 10, p < 0.0005).

In addition, the net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were highly significant in all multimarker lipid panels alone and when added to the base model in the training set ( P ≤ 0.0005), an observation that was reproduced in the test set using the models that were developed in the training set.

A P -value < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.005 (**) was considered highly significant, and P < 0.0005 (***) was considered extremely significant.

These correlations, although weak (r– 0.17, r– 0.14 and r– 0.24, respectively), were highly significant (p = 0.0005, p = 0.005 and p<0.0001, respectively), ( Table 3 ).

Regarding stage group, our study out of 36 resected cases revealed that combined MSH6 & PMS2 loss prevalent in stage III tumors (54.5%), followed by stage II tumors (45.5%), with a highly significant correlation combined markers loss between and III/II stages (p=0.0005).

These predisposing patterns appeared to be associated with a highly significant increase in colorectal cancer, either compared to the reference pattern alone (OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.58–4.42 with p = 0.0005), or compared to reference and mixed patterns gathered (OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.31–2.97 with p = 0.0009).

When including age as continuous variable, the terms for age x month interactions were highly significant ( p = 0.0005, df = 4), suggesting an important trend to lower rates of suicide attempts following the start of AD treatment at higher ages, but not, or less so, at younger ages.

Correspondingly, a highly significant difference for MFI comparing rosetting cultures of blood group A and partly rosetting of blood group O was seen for PAvarO (p = 0,0005) that disappeared with the growth with the pgIgG that prevents rosettes to form in culture (p = 0,0686).

The total effect of NR (Model 2) was highly significant ( t test, p < 0.0005) with a standard regression coefficient (β) of 0.63, indicating a large effect.

Conclusion From the above concrete observations, it can be hypothesized that AHCC is promoting proliferation and differentiation of leukocytes (multipotent stem cells), as it is seen that the genes responsible for these such as LAT, FLRT2, GIT-1, and so forth, as seen in Figure 5 , are upregulated and highly significant ( P < 0.0005).

In a multivariable analysis of EFS including pre-transplant IDDA v2.1 ≤ 14 / ≥15 and HCT-CI ≤ 2 / ≥3 and the interaction between these prognostic factors, as well as age at transplant and date of transplant, neither IDDA v2.1 ( p = 0.059, HR = 4.6) nor HCT-CI ( p = 0.057, HR = 7.1) were independently significant, but the interaction between these two factors combined (HCT-CI ≥ 3 and IDDA v2.1 ≥ 15) was highly significant ( p = 0.0005, HR = 18.0), Fig. 3 H.

There are 48 processes that are highly significant based on our data with FDR<0.005 and p < 0.0005 (FDR cut off value, stringently<0.05, normally<0.25), (see Additional file 3 for a complete list).

In contrast, Lr GtfC 100-23 W240C showed a highly significant positive thermal shift in the presence of both UDP-GlcNAc or UDP-Glc ( p < 0.0005).

This corresponds to a highly significant increase (p = 0.0005).

Linear regression analysis showed a highly significant relation of wound drainage with the duration of antibiotic treatment (p<0.0005, R 2 =97%) and the length of hospital stay (p<0.0005, R 2 =74%).

For MCP 0 in the sMRI‐sFNC pair, all of the comparisons are highly significant compared to the other clusters: MCP 1 ( p < 0.0005) and MCP 2 ( p < 0.0005).

Difference between the mean values of the WFs for the four shortest and four longest ICIs proved to be highly significant [ t (9) = 7.21, p < 0.0005].

Across nearly all cell types most of these P < 0.00001 genes had patterns consistent with specific expression in the correct cell types ( Figure 5 a), representing in all cases a highly significant enrichment relative to randomly selected genes (chi-squared P < 0.0005 to 10 −24 ).