Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
GRP78 attracted our attention due to its high protein amount found in sparsely growing cells, and its highly significant difference in the two growth patterns (SW480: 3.3-fold, p = 0.0005, Figure 1B a, b, c ; HCT116: 2-fold, p = 0.0005, Figure 1B d, e, f ; single analyzed 2-DE areas are shown in Figure S1B ).
highly significantp <0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Reward probability, reward magnitude and their interaction each had a highly significant influence on subject choices (one-sample T-test on regression coefficients, all T(17)>4.6, all p <0.0005), but importantly there was no significant difference in these influences between the two types of trial (paired T-test on regression coefficients between trial types, all |T(17)|<1.52, all p >0.14).
highly significantP < 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant binomial GLMM (χ 2 ML = 33.24, N obs = 196, P < 0.0005; Table 1 ) revealed that, while controlling for the potentially confounding effects of age, sex, group size, the number of zoos a subject had lived in, and task identity, Sumatran subjects were significantly more likely to solve a task than their Bornean congeners (B = 1.934, SE = 0.74, z = 2.63, P < 0.01, Fig. 1 , Table 1 ).
highly significantp = 0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We correlated the tdTomato/YFP ratios with survival time and noticed that infected cells with a shorter survival time tended to be cells with a low ratio of tdTomato/YFP expression (Figure 6 B), and Spearman test resulted in a highly significant correlation index (r = 0.28, p = 0.0005), arguing that LSEC-uniLT that expressed relatively more YFP than tdTomato lysed earlier than cells that expressed more tdTomato.
highly significantp=0.00050.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Regarding stage group, our study out of 36 resected cases revealed that combined MSH6 & PMS2 loss prevalent in stage III tumors (54.5%), followed by stage II tumors (45.5%), with a highly significant correlation combined markers loss between and III/II stages (p=0.0005).
MSH6 and PMS2 expression in colorectal carcinoma.
Bioinformation · 2025 · PMC13018393