Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp value = 1.425 × 10 –40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a statistically highly significant difference in VAF between common and combined LMs versus syndromes (PROS) ( p value = 1.425 × 10 –4 , Fig. 4 a) and versus CLOVES ( p value = 6.510 × 10 –5 , Fig. 4 b), as well as between common LMs versus syndromes (PROS) ( p value = 6.765 × 10 –5 , Fig. 4 c) and versus CLOVES ( p value = 5.290 × 10 –4 , Fig. 4 d).
highly significantP value=1.45×10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Adding information for the eight selected SNPs improved performance to an accuracy of 84% (AUC=0.92) and resulted in highly significant performance improvement as calculated by net reclassification improvement (NRI, NRI categorical: P value=1.45×10 −4 , NRI continuous: 2.81×10 −29 ) and integrated discrimination improvement ( P value=7.33×10 −25 ; Supplementary Table S1 ), emphasising the potential of including these genomic markers (see also receiver operating characteristic in Figure 3c ).
highly significantp = 0.000150.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For the Roseobacter SAGs, the proportion of genes involved in ‘extracellular structure’ (category W) and ‘mobilome: prophages, transposons’ (category X) exhibited a highly significant positive correlation with amino acid sequence variation ( p = 0.00015 and 0.0012, respectively); for the Alteromonas SAGs, the relative abundance of genes involved in ‘cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis’ (category M) was highly significantly positively correlated with amino acid sequence variation ( p = 0.0012).
highly significantP = 1.5 × 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Alternatively, we simply counted the number of genes that had a higher coefficient of variation for the UM state compared to the gbM state; 5357 (or 61.56%) genes had more variable expression among UM epialleles, representing a highly significant deviation from the null expectation of 50% (binomial test, two-sided, P = 1.5 × 10 −4 ).
highly significantp = 1.55×10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
marginally significantp = 0.04991.0× alphagold
These effects on theta power included: a highly significant reduction at frontal sites (p = 1.55×10 −4 ) and a marginally significant reduction at parietal sites (p = 0.0499) in Sp4 hypomorphic animals, as well as a slight but significant increase at occipital sites (p = 0.0203) in wildtype animals ( Fig 4B ).
highly significantP = 0.000160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Prevalence for the same age groups was significantly lower in Kutaisi, at 0% ( P = 0.0062), 3.2% ( P = 0.0018) and 5.2% ( P = 0.0017; all Χ 2 test), respectively, and the overall difference in prevalence, 19.3% versus 7.3%, was also highly significant ( P = 0.00016).
Epidemiology of visceral leishmaniasis in Georgia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis · 2014 · PMC3945224
highly significantp = 0.000160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A linear statistical model of the relative amount of the D1 protein, with the illumination time, dark time and their interaction as explanatory variables, was highly significant ( F (3,26) = 9.883, p = 0.00016; see Appendix S1 for the full characterization of the model) and showed that the lowering of the amount of the D1 protein due to interaction by illumination and subsequent dark time was significant ( p = 0.0485); the negative effect of illumination alone on the D1 protein was not significant ( p = 0.0791), and dark time alone had no effect ( p = 0.997).
highly significantp = 1.6 × 10 −40.0× alphaqualifiedgold
These outcomes are propelled by the differences between total ventral and dorsal tissue allocation at gastrula stages: comparison of hPSCs transplanted to early versus late gastrula PS revealed a highly significant shift from ventral to dorsal fates as gastrulation progressed (hiPSC: X 2 , p = 1.6 × 10 −4 ; hESC: X 2 , p = 0), as calculated by summing ventral and dorsal fates for all regions (anterior, trunk, posterior).
highly significantp = 0.0001630.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In our study when comparing groups of patients with the same GAA genotypes (see results and Table 1 for details) for disease-free life (Figure 1 ) we observed a highly significant difference (p = 0.000163) for the c.-32-13T > G/c.1927G > A genotype, which showed an earlier age of onset, at any age, compared to other genotypes.