Two-way ANOVA Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare the mean of three values obtained from three independent conditions, using GraphPad Prism version 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California, U.S.); * p < 0.05 indicates a significant result; ** p < 0.01 a very significant result, *** p < 0.001 a highly significant result; and **** p < 0.0001 an extremely significant result. 3.
However, 49 cases of co-infection were observed and 10 cases of infection with only Paramarteilia , a result that is highly significant (Chi-Square; χ 2 = 39.4, df = 1 P < 0.0001) and consistent with that found in a previous survey 13 .
Given the highly significant negative correlations between FAI FAT and %F in both sexes of the examined sample (males: r = − 0.5013; females: r = − 0.3564; p < 0.0001), we performed a regression analysis identifying body misperception for subjects with FAI FAT ≥ 2 or ≤ − 2 (Figs. 1 and 2 ) in accordance with previous studies [ 41 , 42 ] on the interpretation of perceived figure (Feel figure) and actual anthropometric values.
Identifying Unreliable Primers Bartlett's test of heteroscadasticity (unequal variability within groups), applied to the residuals of each linear model fit by (1), is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
One‐way ANOVA showed that the treatment factor had a highly significant main effect on SOD activity ( F (4, 10) = 30.12, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.923), MDA level ( F (4, 10) = 39.59, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.941), and GSH‐Px activity ( F (4, 10) = 48.95, p < 0.0001, partial η 2 = 0.951).
Authors observed highly significant, cumulative dose-dependent increased OR of incidence of both SLE and RA following treatment with SERM ( p < 0.0001) [ 26 ].
According to the results of the Kruskal-Wallis analysis, the difference between the mean NLR values of the 3 groups was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
This is a highly significant bias (χ 2 = 49.8, P < 0.0001), indicating that this breed has acquired novel methylation patterns during its selection history.
The micrometry in terms of number of neurons per unit area in various regions shows most highly significant decline (p < 0.0001) in F and BF group in the Diencephalon, Optic Lobe (OL) and Cerebellum regions than that of the Vg (See Table 3 ). 4 Discussion Neuro-developmental toxicology is rather a new branch of toxicology where the brain and nervous system’s development is studied under the influence of commonly found environmental toxins [31] , [32] , [33] .
Statistical analysis using two‐way repeated‐measures ANOVA of PVs revealed highly significant Treatment × Time interactions for both the ipsilateral ( F (25, 270) = 22.73, p < 0.0001) and contralateral ( F (25, 270) = 2.41, p < 0.0001) paws.
The difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001) implying that serum zinc levels of the cases were significantly lower than that of controls.
In our study, we observed a highly significant increase ( Table 2 : p ≤ 0.0001; FC = +8.187) in hypoxanthine excretion in all 20 cases studies, which peaked at one hour after alcohol consumption in 18 of the cases, and at 2 hours in the other two cases ( Fig 4E ).
Highly significant differences in PH among environments were also detected at all measuring stages in the combined analysis over all 10 three-factor combination environments ( P <0.0001) ( Supplementary Table S3 ), indicating that the ontogeny of PH was influenced by environment.
In all areas that were analyzed (CA1, CA3, hilus, and dentate gyrus), there was a highly significant main effect for group ( p < 0.0001 for all areas) but not for treatment (CA3: p = 0.2708; CA1: p = 0.6038; dentate gyrus: p = 0.6610; hilus: p = 0.8269).
The results revealed a highly significant increase in the number of Ki67-positive cells in senile and AD brain sections compared to young subjects ( p < 0.0001).
Combining the P -values above in a Fisher's combined probability test yields a highly significant test statistic (χ 2 = 46.35, df = 12, P < 0.0001).
They found a small, but highly significant, decline in the strength of reported correlations with publication date (best model: P < .0001; R = -0.133) and with sample size (best model: P < 0.002; R = -0.188).
The analysis of variance for stem rust reaction showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) among accessions included in the whole collection, the durum sub-sample and Q2 group.
The distribution of the correlation values was skewed towards positive values with a median of 0.17 and a most probable value of 0.4, results that show a highly significant deviation from randomness (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.0001).
A paired two-sample t -test between reaction times in STTs of the Rand and Rep conditions revealed a highly significant difference ( t (59) = 11.0, p < 0.0001, 95% CI of difference in RT [8.31, 12.0], Cohen’s d = 1.43) (Fig. 3 A).
This difference was statistically highly significant (χ 2 = 162.8681, df = 3, P < 0.0001).
The ANOVA showed a highly significant difference with respect to mean fracture resistance between the three groups ( P < 0.0001) ( Table 2 and Graph 2 ).
Wilcoxon signed rank testing revealed no significant difference between the A1 and O1 groups (P = 0.1810) but a highly significant difference between the A2 and O2 groups (P < 0.0001).
The ANOVA results ( Supplementary Table S1 ) demonstrated that the regression model was highly significant (F = 88.02, p < 0.0001).
Preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease and malignancy were all highly significant risk factors for 30-day hospital admission following initial ED discharge ( p < 0.0001).