“highly significant”

The results were statistically highly significant (P<0.0001).

For tTau and pTau, all pairwise comparisons showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) across all groups with AA individuals showing lower levels ( Fig 1B , C ).

A cutoff of 8.8 for max SUVmax advocated in our previous report was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

A highly significant difference between the expression levels of the CEA(+) and both the CEA(int) and CEA(-) groups was seen ( p <0.0001).

When comparing the time ratio Z3/Z1 in both genotypes with age, a highly significant genotype effect ( p < 0.0001) was observed.

The results showed a highly significant relationship ( P < 0.0001) with C max on Day 1 with an odds ratio of 1.510 (95% CI: 1.279–1.802).

For ventricular weight (VW), two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of AngII treatment ( p < 0.0001), increasing VW compared to saline controls.

A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) for OP swabs to be more sensitive for swabbing was apparent for all four tests at only two of these IPs, namely one turkey IP ( Figure 3 a) and one duck IP ( Figure 3 d).

We log-transformed circulating DAAM2 mRNA expression, demonstrating a highly significant increase (p < 0.0001) in circulating DAAM2 mRNA in pregnancies complicated by preterm fetal growth restriction (Fig. 1 a) compared to gestation-matched controls.

Differences in interactions among genotypes, different points in the time-course and the presence or absence of pathogens were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

All investigated traits had a highly significant effect on longevity (P < 0.0001).

Multivariable Model The three features identified above (histology, non-smoking history, and radiomic Short Run Emphasis) were combined in a multivariable Cox model that was trained on the Dox cohort and produced a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) signature of survival.

The Pearson correlation coefficient between both parameters was 0.988, a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) positive relationship.

ANOVA results ( Table 1 ) indicated that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit was not ( p = 0.5908).

Across all folds, the likelihood ratio chi-square test (LR χ 2 ; (df = 5)) yielded highly significant results ( p < 0.0001), with values ranging from 766.26 to 826.37, indicating strong predictive power.

It was observed that there was a highly significant difference ( P <0.0001) between individuals having MS with and without family history.

We confirmed this finding in our samples where a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) overexpression of ΔNp73 (Fig. 3a , right panel) at diagnosis, but not of the proapoptotic TAp73 isoform (Fig. 3a , left panel).

Linear regression of bill length versus PC1 of seasonality was also highly significant ( p < 0.0001; R 2 = 0.44; Fig. 4 ).

In a model including both eyes, the effect of relative clause type does not reach significance ( β = 0.071, z = 1.46, p = 0.14), but we again find a highly significant interaction of RC type and item order ( β = −0.062, z = −4.07, p < 0.0001).

The difference was highly significant (P < 0.0001; Fisher's exact test).

Although absolute concentrations varied between the ELISA and ECL, the correlation coefficient for CSF A β 42 was r = 0.819 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(b) ). 4.

Interestingly, we recently showed that IL2 stimulation in vitro also leads to a highly significant ( p > 0.0001) hyperproliferation of ID lymphocytes compared to the lymphocytes of control cows [ 5 ], which also highlights the importance of this axis for the immune deviant phenotype.

When comparing the choice frequency in the two geometrically correct (C, R) versus the two geometrically incorrect corners (N, F) a highly significant difference was apparent (F(1,9) = 61.714 p<0.0001), revealing more choices for the two geometrically correct corners (C,R).

However, based on tumor grade, the decrease in HADHA transcript level is not significant (ns, p = 0.999) between normal and grade 1 tumors but it is highly significant between normal and grade 2 ( p < 0.0001) and 3 ( p < 0.001) tumors. 3.2.

ANOVA showed that both season (i.e., autumn and spring) and population had a highly significant effect on mass-specific energy content of lipid and glycogen stores ( P << 0.0001; Table S2 ).