Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Evaluation of Body Weight, Body Mass Index, Visceral, and Subcutaneous Fat Deposits The results in Table 2 show that after 6 weeks of HFD feeding, rats in the groups DC, Metformin 180 mg/kg, AESS 100, AESS 200, and AESS 400 mg/kg showed highly significant (P < .0001) gain in body weight compared to NC animals.
highly significantp = 0001the decimal point is missing; read as 0.0001qualifiedgold
At 3dpi, two doses of VBI-2902a resulted in highly significant (p = 0001) viral load median reductions ( Fig. 8 a) of 4,45 Log10 (IQR 4,95–4,33)in the cranial lobe and 5,17 Log10 (IQR 5,69–4,39) in the caudal lobe relative to non-immunized animals.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Starting the study with MSCs separated from the adipose tissue of the patients with non-healing wounds for autological transplantation, our attention was drawn by a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the wound size and wound closure degree and by the high percentage (on average 75%) of CD34 + cells among the isolated cells [ 33 ].
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The antibody levels progressively increased with a subsequent booster dose, and all three immunized groups showed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) elevation in OD values compared to the unvaccinated mice at 35 dpv (OD values: 1.38 ± 0.00, 1.23 ± 0.01, and 0.91 ± 0.01 for vToH-QMV, vToH-DMV, and wt, respectively) ( Figure 3 B, Table S3 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Differences in intra-network variability between groups The MSLR test assessing differences in the coefficients of variation of GM volume between groups showed significant group effects between psychosis controls and FEP ( χ 2(1) = 9.13, p = 0.0025), and between Con-PD and PDN ( χ 2(1) = 10.97, p < 0.001), as well as highly significant group effects between Con-PD and PDP ( χ 2(1) = 15.21, p < 0.0001), indicating a higher variability in all patient groups across all networks (Fig. 4 ).