“highly significant”

A highly significant difference in the journal impact factor ( p < 0.0001) was observed between manuscripts associated with OC (8.3 ± 10.1) and PP (4.0 ± 2.3).

Conversely, when false negatives were regarded as more critical, the standardized examination again yielded a substantially higher average kappa (0.59, SE = 0.023) relative to the non-standardized method (0.45, SE = 0.027), with this difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.07 to 0.21.

The resulting regression equation is as follows: (1) Y = 80.03 + 11.13 A − 0.6750 B − 9.75 C − 0.125 AB + 1.93 AC − 3.43 BC − 7.41 A 2 − 1.76 B 2 − 11.61 C 2 According to the analysis of variance results ( Table 3 ), the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( p = 0.1019 > 0.05), indicating that the model was well-fitted.

Among the 200 primary gastric carcinomas of the referred dataset, a statistically highly significant positive association (Spearman’s rank correlation p < 0.0001) between the expression of ERBB2 and FUT3 genes was observed ( Figure 5 d).

The ANOVA results for protein content in this group showed a highly significant F-value of 284.19 ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating that there are statistically significant differences among the samples in this group.

Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Variability The power spectral analysis revealed significant difference ( p = 0.045) for LF power and highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) for both HF power and LF/HF power ratio.

The associations of ap2-g and gexp-5 transcript abundance with gametocyte production remained highly significant after adjustment for gametocyte density at the time of measurement ( p < 0.0001).

The levels of serum NO levels showed highly significant correlation with saliva levels of NO in Group I ( r = 0.8607, P < 0.0001) as well as in Group II ( r = 0.9224, P < 0.0001) [ Table 4 ].

Such increases became highly significant in P20 cells ( p < 0.001) and extremely significant and peaked in value in cells at P25 and P30 ( p < 0.0001) when compared to those for P5 cells.

kudriavzevii ITMLB97, the best correlation models were those produced from inulin ( Q 2 = 0.93) and BS-juice ( Q 2 = 0.93), which had a highly significant effect ( p < 0.0001) on the MIR profiles.

OS-related mortality showed a highly significant association with progressive disease during therapy ( p < 0.0001) and relapse off therapy ( p = 0.009).

When it comes to intra-group difference, test group exhibited a statistically highly significant difference at all timepoints (M0, M3 and M6 versus screening; paired t -test; p < 0.0001).

With all three stimulation probes, despite the difference in design, a highly significant lowering in blood pressure was achieved with a p = 0.0001 according to the Wilcoxin Signed-Rank test.

In the case of the non-sensitive membrane proteins, the motif was found only in 5 out of 143 sequences demonstrating a highly significant correlation between the presence of the motif in an SAS and its cotransin sensitivity (p value < 0.0001 according to Fisher ́s exact test) [ 21 ].

The TMAO concentrations showed a highly significant difference between patients with CKD and healthy controls ( p < 0.0001).

To test for the scalar invariance of the controlling-behavior items, the ∆CFI between the configural model and the scalar model was not within its recommended range of ≤ 0.002 [ 34 ], and the χ 2 difference test comparing the nested scalar model with the configural model was highly significant, at p <.0001.

Through statistical analysis using Student’s t-test, we observed highly significant differences in anti-Xa assay results between bleeding and non-bleeding groups ( p < 0.0001) at both peak and trough times.

Highly significant differences were observed for PCA in PC1 (p < 0.0001) and for PCoA (p < 0.0001).

The difference in the number of symmetric divisions that produced two ISC daughter cells was highly significant when comparing ISCs depleted of miR-305 versus control cells ( P = 0.0001, Fisher’s exact test) ( Table 1 ).

Notably, the interaction between miR - 146a rs2910164 and rs57095329 was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) across several genotype combination levels, conferring a 10- to 100-fold reduced risk of MS. miR - 146a rs57095329 showed significant interactions with IRAK-1 rs3027898 and miR-155 rs767649 ( P < 0.05, before Bonferroni correction).

allopatric) and recipient pond, was highly significant ( X2 = 57.9, df = 23, p < 0.0001; Table SI 4 ).

All these differences were statistically highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Assessment of total GIPR protein levels in both males and female mice reflected the mRNA findings and depicted a highly significant decline in expression from P7 to P21 ( Fig 2H and 2K , males p<0.0001, females p<0.0001). 2.5 Correlations of protein expression with glucose levels and body weight To determine a potential role or link between receptor expression in the hypothalamus and functions in physiology in development, we analyzed correlations between postnatal blood glucose and body weight in males and females combined.

Their respective values of areas under the curves (AUC) of ROC curves were 0.76, 0.68 and 0.91 respectively, of which all exhibited highly significant differences (p<0.0001) compared with the control subjects.

According to the results of the variation analysis, it was determined that magnetic field intensity interaction was very highly significant ( p < 0.0001) on the DPPH value and the pellicle weight.