“highly significant”

A two-way ANOVA revealed a lack of effect of treatment and interaction, but a highly significant effect of time in both regions (F (5,81) = 9.82, p<0.0001 NAc; F (5,69) = 5.83, p = 0.0002 CP).

A highly significant association was observed between mutation type and gene (Chi 2 = 958.8; p < 0.0001).

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that both models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with non-significant lack-of-fit terms ( p > 0.05).

The difference in spatial selectivity between the two brain areas was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).

Concerning attention behavior during familiarization, a repeated-measures ANOVA with looking time as dependent measure, language group (Catalan, Spanish, bilingual) and familiarization condition (TB or GM) as a between-group factors and trial (first, last) as repeated measures revealed a highly significant effect of familiarization trial [ F (1, 48) = 42.9; p = 0.0001; η 2 = 0.47], and no effect of language group or condition and no significant interactions [familiarization trial × language group: F (2, 48) = 1.15; p = 0.32; η 2 = 0.04; familiarization trial × condition: F (1, 48) = 1.7; p = 0.19; η 2 = 0.03; familiarization trial × language group × condition: F < 1].

A quadratic regression model (Equation (4)) was developed to relate the response variable to the independent factors. (4) Y = 67.75 + 0.96 A + 2.43 B − 0.34 C + 1.32 AB − 0.20 AC + 1.38 BC − 0.80 A 2 − 3.68 B 2 − 0.25 C 2 The developed model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001, Table 4 ).

In addition, a highly significant correlation between the zinc concentration and age was observed in the child group (r = 0.298, p < 0.0001), with a plateau at ages over 10 years ( Fig. 6 ).

qRT-PCR again showed a reduction in PDS mRNA levels in plants infected with BSMV-BdPDS compared to BSMV-GFP 375 , the difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 5B ).

Results Data on all decided agonistic interactions produced a highly significant linear dominance hierarchy (h' = 0.97, p = 0.0001; 10,000 matrix permutations).

anxiety disorders showed an AUC of .68 ( p < .0001), with sensitivities of .90/.87 and specificities of .34/.44 for ASD using the recommended SCDC cut-offs. SRS and SCDC total scores differed highly significant between groups ( F 2/469 > 54.9, p < .0001, eta 2 > .19), with ASD scoring higher than CLIN, and CLIN scoring higher than TYP ( p < .0001) in both scales.

The difference in TsH values between both groups was highly significant ( P < .0001) as well as between group A and control group ( P < .001; according to the all pairwise multiple comparison procedures-Holm-Sidak method).

The frequency of dicentrics showed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.0001) in Group I, Group II, and Group III compared to Group IV.

Although all four correlations were highly significant ( P <0.0001), by using g s the regression coefficients became higher, in agreement with previous surveys suggesting g s as a reference parameter ( Medrano et al. , 2002 ; Flexas et al. , 2004 ).

The linear regression reveals a strong, positive, and statistically highly significant correlation between the AFB smear grade and the MPT64 concentration ( R = 0.777, P < 0.0001) ( Figure 1B ).

In contrast, the LGG cohort showed highly significant separation of survival curves, with the low-risk group demonstrating markedly improved outcomes ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure S3E ).

Intriguingly, the sorted IFNβ + Tip-DCs also stimulated the naïve T cells to proliferate in a highly significant manner (p < 0.0001 as compared to macrophages) and more efficiently than the sorted IFNβ/YFP − bona fide Tip-DCs ( Figure 6 ).

Siebert et al , 16 reported a highly significant difference in tibiofemoral alignment between the two groups (RA: 1/70, 1.4% [4° deviation from planned angle] vs CM: 18/52, 35% [deviation >3°- 7°]; p<0.0001).

This relationship was supported by a highly significant model ( p < 0.0001).

The quadratic equation generated from the models ( Figure 2 ) is the following Equation (2): (2) Rupture strength = −71.72 + 19.14A + 15.99B + 3381.93C + 4.78D − 0.43AB + 136.21AC − 0.29AD − 460.12BC + 0.88BD − 79.31CD − 4.30A2 − 32560.72C2 − 0.22D2 − 3.43B2 The compressive strength response surface model was highly significant (F = 22.36, p < 0.0001, Table S3 ), accounting for 91.16% of the total variation ( R 2 = 0.9116, adjusted R 2 = 0.9116, predicted R 2 = 0.834) with a non-significant lack-of-fit ( p = 0.683), confirming the model reliability.

Comparison of ICC coefficients for SRSS between groups with and without ASD as offspring revealed a Z score of 190, indicating a highly significant difference: p < 0.0001 indicating a lower correlation of SRSS between parents of one or more children with autistic spectrum disorder compared to parents not chosen for having offspring with this disorder. 3.2.6.

Differences were considered significant when p<0.01 (*), and highly significant when p<0.0001 (***).

Intervention Outcomes and Group Comparison Overall, the results of our intervention are highly significant (as shown in Table 2 and Table 3 ) with a p -value of <0.0001 for all parameters across both groups.

The generated Moran's I values (Table 2 ) are highly significant ( p value < 0.0001) and indicate a quite strong degree of positive spatial autocorrelation; regions with similar rates of COVID-19 deaths tend to be located next to each other (i.e. they form spatial clusters).

As expected, predicted expression varied in a manner consistent with the codon usage bias measures: genes near O2 and O3 are predicted to be expressed most and those distant from origins significantly less ( supplementary table S2 , Supplementary Material online), and the genome-wide regression of MELP on distance to the nearest origin was also highly significant ( Fig 4 , F = 96.2, P < 0.0001), albeit weakly predictive ( r 2 = 0.05).

Photographs of 15 randomly chosen sparrows were measured again several months later; repeatability between measures was highly significant for all four ornament variables (all R i >0.81, all F >10.17, all P <0.0001).