“extremely significant”

p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 values were considered significant and extremely significant, respectively, whereas 0.05 < p < 0.10 indicated a tendency. 3.

Statistically significant differences between treatment groups were determined at p<0.05, while extremely significant differences were observed at p<0.01. 0.05<p<0.10 was taken as an indication of tendency.

A probability of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 was described as extremely significant, and 0.05 < P < 0.10 was defined as a tendency towards significance.

Probability values of <0.05 and < 0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively, and 0.05 ≤ P ≤ 0.10 were considered as a tendency. 3.

p ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant difference, p ≤ 0.01 was considered as extremely significant difference, and 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 was considered as trend.

Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05 and extremely significant at P < 0.1.

p ≤ 0.05 was considered as significant difference, p ≤ 0.01 was considered as extremely significant difference, and 0.05 ≤ p < 0.10 was considered as trend. 3.

begin{document}$${\mathrm{Y}}_{1} = 203.20 + 14.00{\mathrm{A}} + 16.13{\mathrm{B}} + 12.25{\mathrm{AB}} - 10.10{\mathrm{A}}^{2} + 8.65{\mathrm{C}}^{2}$$\end{document} Y 1 = 203.20 + 14.00 A + 16.13 B + 12.25 AB - 10.10 A 2 + 8.65 C 2 According to Table 6 , the quadratic regression model P < 0.01 is extremely significant, and the lack of fit term P > 0.1 is significant, indicating that the fitting model can correctly reflect the relationship between various factors and errors, and can better predict the test results.

Haplotype Analysis for Candidate Genes We screened potential candidate genes for cold tolerance when they met at least one of the following criteria: (1) We would match the genes with extremely significant as-sociation SNPs ( p -value < 1/N) in each characteristic (the downstream genes are selected if the SNP is located between the genes) as important candidate genes; (2) The funRiceGenes database [ 24 ] and the Nipponbare reference genome IRGSP 1.0 [ 25 ] were used to locate genes with abiotic stress-related functional annotations.

Methylobacterium and Rhizobium have extremely significant differences in response to salt stress, and Exiquobacterium also shows significant differences.

Results: When Groups A and B were contrasted Group B exhibited more beneficial for swelling and trismus with a P value of 0.0001, which is extremely significant.

Effect of pH An extremely significant factor that affects the removal efficiency of an adsorbent in wastewater treatment is the pH of the solution since the adsorption efficiency is influenced by the pH of the medium.

Multiple group comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA, with p < 0.05 being considered significant and p < 0.01 being considered extremely significant.

Evaluation of rice texture and taste in the improved BTYXZ lines Since the improved TYXZ lines (BTYXZ‐1 and BTYXZ‐2) had extremely significant changes in gel consistency compared with the wild‐type control (TYXZ), we conducted grain texture analysis on fresh cooked rice and retrograded cooked rice.

The degree of lignification of scion branches and the grafting method have extremely significant or significant effects on the shoot flushing and non-emergence rates of grafted C. oleifera seedlings, with shoot flushing rates of 92.00% and 79.33% for recently lignified and semi-lignified branches, respectively [ 9 ].

Analysis of variance was used for comparing more than two samples, where p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 (two-tailed) were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively.

Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant, and values of P < 0.01 were considered extremely significant.

The main effect of the subject category was extremely significant and unrelated to whether the scene had social interaction or not, F(1,36) = 9.714, p = 0.004 < 0.01.

Thresholds of significance determined were p > 0.05 = not significant, p ≤ 0.05 = significant, p ≤ 0.01 = very significant, and p ≤ 0.001 = extremely significant. 3 Results The pH of soil collected from the Dumpsite was slightly acidic compared to those of Lagoon front and control station (Highrise) which were within the standard range of Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment ( CCME, 2001 ).

A P value < .05 or <.01 was used to define a significant or extremely significant difference, respectively. 3.

Glutathione, however, as basic nonenzymatic cellular antioxidant plays an extremely significant role in the process of disposal of free radicals of potential neurodegenerative effect [ 52 – 55 ]. 4.

All of the isolates’ results were extremely significant when compared to the control group, which received distilled water as a treatment.

The genera Laetisaria , Fusarium , and Phoma were significantly negatively correlated with pH, of which Laetisaria and Phoma were extremely significant.

RT-qPCR results by randomly selecting miRNAs and their target genes showed that there was extremely significant correlation between some miRNAs and mRNA, however, there were some miRNAs and mRNA with no obvious correlation.

The difference in pre and post test scores at the 0.05 level was extremely significant. t = −11.647, p = 0.000 < 0.05.