“extremely significant”

Correlation analysis Significant or extremely significant linear positive correlations were observed between rice yield and the number of productive panicles ( P < 0.05), thousand grain weight ( P < 0.01), total biomass ( P < 0.01), harvest index ( P < 0.01), post-heading dry matter ( P < 0.01), grain nitrogen uptake ( P < 0.01), grain phosphorus uptake ( P < 0.01), internal nitrogen use efficiency ( P < 0.01), and internal phosphorus use efficiency ( P < 0.01).

∗∗∗ p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant. p > 0.05 was considered not significant (NS).

Statistical significance was denoted as follows: p < 0.01 indicates an extremely significant difference (**); p > 0.05 indicates no significant difference (ns). 4.

In this study, P < 0.01 is treated as extremely significant and P < 0.05 is treated as significantly different.

p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*) and p ≤ 0.001 extremely significant (***). p > 0.05 was considered not significant (ns). 10.7554/eLife.40856.047 Decision letter Zhang Hong Reviewing Editor Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences China In the interests of transparency, eLife includes the editorial decision letter and accompanying author responses.

p < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference, p < 0.01 an extremely significant difference, and p > 0.05 no significant difference. 3.

p < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.001 indicated statistically significant, highly significant, and extremely significant differences, respectively (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001). 3.

Differences were considered significant and extremely significant if p < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively.

Relative to GAPDH , expression levels of all genes were calculated using the 2 −ΔΔCT method; p < 0.01 is extremely significant, p < 0.05 is significant, while genes with a trend of change but not significant have not been labeled.

These oils, characterized by high ratios of PUFAs/SFAs, with an extremely significant high value (p < 0.05) for cultivar C2 (6.25), are susceptible to oxidative damage due to their high α-linolenic acid content (28-33%).

One-way ANOVA was used to determine significant differences among the groups and * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001 represent statistically significant, very significant, and extremely significant values, respectively; whereas p > 0.05 represents no statistically significant values.

10 Gy dose at standard rates and at one fourth of the standard - The decrease in cell viability was extremely significant ( p < 0.05) at the 24-, 48- and 72-hour time, not only in relation to the non-irradiated control, but also in an equivalent manner for the two dose rates, as shown on Figure 3 .

In CS group (shedding from day 1), the mRNA level of ALV-J and chNHE1 showed an extremely significant increase when compared with LS, NS and control group ( P < 0.05).

From the transcriptomic analysis, a total of 1292 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (615 upregulated and 677 downregulated) with extremely significant (FC < 0.5 or >2, and p < 0.05) expression patterns before and after celastrol treatment were identified (Figure S3A , Supporting Information).

P<0.05 (marked *) indicates significant difference, P<0.01 (marked **) indicates extremely significant difference, P>0.05 indicates that difference is not significant; the difference between the values of different superscript letters of the three groups of data is statistically significant (P < 0.05).

p < 0.05 was considered to be a significant difference, p < 0.01 was considered to be extremely significant difference, and p > 0.05 was considered to be no significant difference.

P <0.05 indicated a significant difference, P <0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference, and P >0.05 indicated no significant difference.

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests, together with a post-hoc Tukey’s test or Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was conducted using the SPSS (version 25.0) software (LEAD Technologies, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) to examine the data by the following significance levels: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001, which represent statistically significant, very significant, and extremely significant values, respectively. p > 0.05 indicated that there were no statistically significant values. 3.

A p -value of 0.01 < p < 0.05 was considered significant, p < 0.01 was extremely significant, and p > 0.05 was considered insignificant.

Differences were considered significant and extremely significant at p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01, respectively. p ≤ 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01 were denoted by * and **, respectively. 3.

p < 0.01 was considered an extremely significant difference. p < 0.05 was considered a significant difference. 3.

In this study, P < 0.01 is an extremely significant difference, and P < 0.05 is a significant difference.

There was an extremely significant (p < 0.05) upregulation of il8 at the 12 h timepoint in both groups relative to the baseline control and the 3 and 6 hpi timepoints ( Figure 4F ).

Using scenario 4 simulations, the Spearman’s correlation between maximal abundance of collected mosquitoes and the predicted number of mosquitoes over one year was extremely significant (ρ = 1, P = 0.083; Fig. 6 ).

p < 0.05 was a significant difference, p ≤ 0.01 was an extremely significant difference, and 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.1 was a trend. 3.