“extremely significant”

The significant level was defined as 0.05, and the extremely significant was set at 0.001.

The significant difference level was accepted at p < 0.05, and the extremely significant difference level was accepted at p < 0.01. 3.

There was significant or extremely significant positive correlation between yield, number of spike significant or extremely significant positive correlation between yield, number of per spike and dry matter quality of leaves, and grains at maturity stage.

However, 0.05 > p > 0.01 was significant, and p < 0.01 was extremely significant. 3.

Thus, there was an extremely significant difference in that no intramyocardial hemorrhage was observed in the marginal infarction area, where microvessels remained healthy, and red blood cell coagulation and numerous neutrophils were observed, indicating reperfusion therapy can reverse myocardial tissue injury in the marginal infarction area.

One-way ANOVA was used to compare differences between groups, with p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 considered to be significant and extremely significant differences, respectively. 3 Results 3.1 Cloning and expression pattern analysis of PhbZIP2 The cDNA clone of PhbZIP2 was verified with a PCR-based sequence.

The p -value of < 0.01 was considered as extremely significant.

Two asterisks (**, P < 0.01) indicate extremely significant differences between WT and osg lines as determined by Student’s t-test.

p < 0.05 or p < 0.01 indicates significant or extremely significant differences. 3.

Here, p < 0.05 (*) indicates statistically significant, p < 0.01 (**) indicates very significant, and p < 0.001 (***) indicates extremely significant values. 3.

The analysis of variance ( Table 4 ) showed P-value was less than 0.01, which implied that the model itself is extremely significant.

It was found that RghBNG mRNA was expressed in all the tissues tested, with the strongest signal in root and the significant difference between root and leaf at seedling stage (α = 0.05); with the strongest signal in petal and the extremely significant one between petal and each of others, the one between receptacle or stamen and root or stem or leaf, the one between leaf and pistil at full blooming stage (α = 0.01); with the strongest one in root, and the extremely significant one between root and stem or leaf (α = 0.01), and the significant one between stem and leaf (α = 0.05) at mature stage (Figure 3 ).

Mixed model ANOVA performed on individual geosmin concentration values showed a significant Year effect and extremely significant Family effect ( Table 1 ).

A difference at P≤0.01 was considered significant, and P≤0.001 was considered extremely significant.

19 Type II collagen and aggrecan are the major structural constituents of the ECM, 12 , 20 while MMP13, as a vital part of collagenase family, occupies an extremely significant position aiming type II collagen disintegration, and ADAMTS5, as a key member of secreted zinc proteases, shows dramatically destructive effects of aggrecan synthesis. 21 , 22 Moreover, a specific molecular repressor in the NF‐κB p65 nuclear translocation has been verified to delay the process of O

The 3 dBi directivity percent bandwidth is around B % ≈ 7.6 % at the lower frequency and around B % ≈ 3.3 % at the higher frequency, this latter is slightly below the usual performance of single-frequency structures 47 , but extremely significant considering the benefit in the reuse of the same aperture for the two frequencies.

Consistent with expectations, the present results showed that there was an extremely significant positive correlation between the PhytOC and phytolith content and between the phytolith and total Si content ( Table 3 ).

Our results revealed that the number of pre-hierarchical follicles gradually decreased over time, showing extremely significant differences between the SWF vs.

Opportunistic infections are extremely significant, often hard to detect, associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and difficult to treat effectively.

brucei infection accounts for 52.47% of the total variance (F (1, 16) = 30.72, p < 0.0001) and this is considered extremely significant.

On comparison of preoperative and three months postoperative JOA scores using Wilcoxon's test for nonparametric data, P value is <0.001 which meant that outcomes were extremely significant postoperatively.

p < 0.01 indicated that the difference was extremely significant, which was indicated by "**".

Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) multiple-range test was applied to reveal the differences between treatments with a significance level of 0.05 and an extremely significant level of 0.01. 3.

By contrast, the expression level of eGFP of WT/eGFP was extremely significant higher than eGFP level of G1332V/eGFP in U2OS cells.

The ability to reflect one’s mortality or to ‘grow’ through death, which the patient might have judged to be extremely significant before, would become pointless.