“extremely significant”

*** indicates that p < 0.001 (extremely significant). ns = not significant ( p > 0.05). 5.

Correlation analysis revealed significant or extremely significant positive correlations between leaf width (LW) and leaf length (LL), leaf index (LI) and LL, fruit longitude (FL) and LL, FI and LL, and LI and FI ( P < 0.05) and between single-fruit weight (FW) and FL, FW and FD, and FI and FL ( P < 0.01), respectively, whereas a significant or extremely negative correlation was observed between pairs LI and LW and LI and FD ( P < 0.05) and between FI and FD ( P < 0.01), respectively (Fig. 2 A-C).

The FACS result Indicated an extremely significant decrease of the cell population in G 0 /G 1 phase in HSF upon the PAL crude ethanol extracts (0.5, 2 mg/mL) treatment (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01).

Because some results could be considered extremely significant, the level of significance was specified by the number of asterisks and further determined in the result section as: * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.025; *** = p < 0.0001.

Statistics The differences among groups were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and were considered significant and extremely significant when P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively.

The level of significant and extremely significant differences were set at P <0.05 and P <0.01, respectively.

For Figures 1 – 7 and Supplementary Figure 4 , data are presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical differences were considered significant, strongly significant, and extremely significant at respective p values of ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗ p ≤ 0.001, and **** p ≤ 0.0001.

P<0.001 was considered extremely significant, P>0.05 was considered non-significant.

Furthermore, the change of the characteristic across sites was extremely significant ( p < 0.05).

In line with our hypothesis, the regression tests results showed that exogenous Cd, amendments, and the interaction between amendments and Cd had a significant or extremely significant effect on the accumulation of Cd in cotton organs (P < 0.05) .

5 A), and the difference was extremely significant (p<0.05).

*, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, and ***, p < 0.001 were considered statistically significant, very significant, and extremely significant, respectively, and p > 0.05 was considered not significant.

The significance level was considered as significant and extremely significant according to p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.

p < 0.05 was significant, p < 0.01 was extremely significant, and p > 0.05 indicated no significant difference.

Among them, the panicle weight of conventional rice reached a significant or extremely significant correlation level with the concentration of Pb and Cr ( p < 0.05, p < 0.01).

Statistical difference was respectively declared as significant, highly or extremely significant with P < 0.05, < 0.01 or < 0.001, and trend was considered at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10.

unclassified_f__ Lachnospiraceae had an extremely significant decline in the G2 group compared with the control group at 14 days of age ( P < 0.05).

Analysis of variance indicated that the impact of radiation dose on 8-OHdG level was extremely significant ( P < .05), while incubation time exerted no such significant effect ( P =.978; Figure 2B ).

p < 0.001 indicated that the difference was extremely significant, while p < 0.05 indicated that the difference was significant.

Results were considered significant according to GraphPad Prism: *indicates p-value 0.01 to 0.05 (significant), **Indicates p-value 0.001 to 0.01 (very significant), ***Indicates p < 0.001 (extremely significant), ns = not significant (p > 0.05).

*** P -value < 0.001 extremely significant; ** P -value 0.001–0.01 very significant; P -value > 0.05 non-significant.

Correlation analysis Significant or extremely significant linear positive correlations were observed between rice yield and the number of productive panicles ( P < 0.05), thousand grain weight ( P < 0.01), total biomass ( P < 0.01), harvest index ( P < 0.01), post-heading dry matter ( P < 0.01), grain nitrogen uptake ( P < 0.01), grain phosphorus uptake ( P < 0.01), internal nitrogen use efficiency ( P < 0.01), and internal phosphorus use efficiency ( P < 0.01).

∗∗∗ p < 0.001 was considered extremely significant. p > 0.05 was considered not significant (NS).

In this study, P < 0.01 is treated as extremely significant and P < 0.05 is treated as significantly different.

Statistical significance was denoted as follows: p < 0.01 indicates an extremely significant difference (**); p > 0.05 indicates no significant difference (ns). 4.